Su propia víctima

...even when some of those small things are not so small. 20 years ago Edith Phillips was going to marry wealthy Frank DeLorca. The wealth didn't really matter to Edith, but it mattered to her twin sister Margaret. It mattered so much that she slept with Frank and then announced she was pregnant, so Frank married Margaret out of obligation. There is still a shred of production code left, so I am explaining more than the film does. Edith has never forgiven Margaret for taking Frank away from her, but I'd say Frank does share some blame too since he must have slept with her.

So in modern day, which is where the film actually starts, Frank has died and Edith goes to Frank's funeral. This is where she finds out by the offhand remark of the DeLorca chauffeur that there never was a child. Margaret lied to both Frank and Edith to get the life of ease she wanted. In Edith's personal life she is about to lose the bar she runs because of back rent. She does good business but she is too generous for her own good. But that generosity does not extend to Margaret. Margaret, not knowing that Edith suspects the fake pregnancy business, goes to visit her in her apartment. After making double doggone sure that there never was a baby by getting Margaret to confess, Edith kills Margaret, changes outfits with her, dumps a suicide note in Margaret's lap that is supposedly written by Edith, and goes to take up Margaret's life as a DeLorca where she left off.

The thing is, what she really wanted that Margaret had - Frank - is dead, and the rest of it is rather empty without him. Plus there are any number of things to trip her up, starting with the fact that she knows none of the servants, does not know her way around the DeLorca mansion, and does not know Margaret's routine or friends. On top of this Margaret had a boyfriend on the side who is not exactly a catch - an obvious fortune hunter played by a rather fat and flabby Peter Lawford. And he is blackmailing "Margaret" and for good reason. Complications, some very ironic, ensue.

Davis still has it as she convincingly plays the working class Edith, the pampered Margaret, and Edith masquerading as Margaret quite convincingly. Karl Malden is quite touching as Edith's cop boyfriend. He has two possible endings to Edith's story, neither which is flattering, and he doesn't know which to believe. The jazz band playing over Edith's killing of her sister and covering it up adds to the tension of the scene.

I'd recommend this one.

Many of the films of the 60s were boring as hell. It took a star like Bette Davis to bring the necessary fire to this double role as twins in "Dead Ringer." In other hands, this might have been unworthy, but with Davis' magical screen presence, you can't take your eyes off her (both of her!) Even in small scenes, she's real and radiant (when Jim gives her the watch for her birthday). Andre Previn's score is superb. I loved the music after Edith storms out of Margaret's bedroom in the beginning of the film when she sees the portrait of her sister's dead husband and HER former lover, followed by that tender moment with the butler.

With the performances that got Oscar nominations during the '60s, some were pretty dull. Compared to them, Bette deserved a nod for best actress. Davis was wonderful in this. Her years of acting experience before the cameras was on full display in every scene...she was the consummate professional.

Did you notice Perry Blackwell at the organ? She also appeared in the Doris Day/Rock Hudson hit,"Pillow Talk" as the nightclub singer a few years prior. The drummer in this was married to Nancy Wilson!

This movie could easily have become a sad and pathetic parody of the final stages of a great actor's career. Instead it marks another pinnacle in the history of one of Hollywood's greatest players, Bette Davis. There are not enough superlatives to describe her performance. Not only does Davis carry the movie, she is the movie. Her performance transcends the material. This movie is an example of where the actor succeeds in elevating the script. The story is cleverly written and beautifully photographed in a black and white context that sets the mood for the movie. But it is Bette Davis's performance as a twin which makes this movie not only watchable but fun to watch. Like Bette Davis herself, this movie has aged well. Davis has since departed us but her legacy lives on in her many wonderful movies, including this one.

Bette Davis plays twin sisters, one glamorous, the other homely, in this tale of deception, betrayal, and murder. What makes the story so fascinating is its delicious irony, as the homely sister, Edith, becomes ever more ensnared in her own tangled web.

The story is marred slightly by some obvious contrivances and plot holes. But it has lots of twists and turns. And Bette Davis, with her memorable voice, her gestures, and those Bette Davis eyes renders the Edith character engaging, as she realizes something important that she had not foreseen, and then makes an effort not to be found out. It's all about the internal tension of faking a false identity.

Much of the plot is consumed in detail, as we watch Edith squirm and fret when confronted with small tasks like switching clothes with a corpse, faking a signature, or determining the combination to a wall safe. These action details are somewhat tedious. But they give Davis lots of opportunity to act.

The film's B&W cinematography is fine. The split screen technology wherein both sisters appear together in the same scene is rather self-conscious, but was quite advanced for its time. Rear screen projection is another technique that is used, but seems primitive by today's technical standards. The film's lighting is quite good.

The film gets off to a really good start with a snazzy, and very Hitchcockian, title sequence accompanied by Andre Previn's excellent original score. The film's supporting cast includes Karl Malden, Estelle Winwood, and Jean Hagen. But, though they are all credible in their roles, this film belongs to Bette Davis. It's her show. And a viewer's response to the film will hinge largely on their impression of Bette Davis and her ability to play two roles. Personally, I think she did a splendid job.

Among her contemporaries Bette Davis is the only one I know who managed to carry off playing twin sisters twice in films. The first time was in A Stolen Life and in 1964 she did it again in Dead Ringer. The first time she was a good and a bad twin, but in Dead Ringer both twins commit evil acts during the course of the movie.

Bette's former co-star Paul Henreid directed her in Dead Ringer with co- stars Karl Malden and Peter Lawford. Back in the day one twin stole the man the other was in love with because he was rich, prosperous, and part of old California society. That one got rich, the other never married and now lives owning a bar that she's way behind in debt with.

When the husband dies the bar owner learns that back in the day he was tricked into marriage with a false pregnancy story and as the family was Catholic he married her and couldn't divorce. That sets the bar owner into a murderous frenzy and she kills the widow and then assumes her place while she also fakes a suicide story.

With a few bumps along the way Bette settles into the other Bette's life. Then a lowlife boyfriend played by Peter Lawford comes back in the picture. Lawford is a gigolo/golf pro and he and society Bette have some deep secrets. The rest you can see for yourself.

Oddly enough A Stolen Life also involved a twin taking another's place and as for the rest of the story, if you know what happens in The Postman Always Rings Twice you know what happens here.

With the possible exception of Whatever Happened To Baby Jane, Dead Ringer maybe Davis's best film of the Sixties. She throws herself into both roles so well that it like watching twins in action. She also has a nice group of supporting players in roles they are well cast in. But this one is Bette's show.

Watch her steal another life.