La edad inocente

I've never been a big admirer of MARGARET O'BRIEN, so it should come as no surprise that I disliked this dull teen-age story about a budding romance at summer camp (based actually on a Herman Wouk novel about a Jewish boy growing up in New York City)--but even I have to admit that there was very little she could do to overcome such a weak script. She was at the so-called "awkward age" for this outing at Columbia and it shows.

Nor does the rest of the cast do anything to lift the picture from the ordinary. ELINOR DONOHUE is unpleasant as her rival at camp and ANN DORAN does her usual competent job as Margaret's mother, but nothing really helps although LLOYD CORRIGAN lends some sturdy support.

It's a trite and banal script and it's a shame that studios couldn't find better material for child stars once they reached that certain age.

Best to skip this one, unless you're a real O'Brien fan.

I saw "Her First Romance" today, and was impressed by how Margaret O' Brien, at age 16, still could entertain an audience despite her getting a little older. Her Betty Foster was a girl who goes through the things that young teen-age girls go through...dating the guys, competing with other girls for the attention of a guy, and so on. What I found strange was her robbing her father's safe to get her boyfriend's attention. Elinor Donahue, who had co-starred with O'Brien in 1947's "The Unfinished Dance," dyed her brunette hair blonde to play the girl who competes with O'Brien's Foster for Allen Martin, Jr.'s Bobby Evans, the athletic young heartthrob they fight over at their summer camp.

Ann Doran and Arthur Space did a manageable job as Foster's parents. While the film comes during O'Brien's post MGM days, leading to public opinion of her not being as entertaining as she was as an adorable child star, and in spite of her chubby figure at the time the movie was filmed, there was no mistaking that lovely innocent face and sweet demeanor. I felt entertained by "Her First Romance." Hope to see it on video. Also, if you liked O'Brien in "Her First Romance," you'll also like her, at age 21, in 1956's "Glory," a musical about a girl who helps to raise a thoroughbred to championship status. It was O'Brien's last film, to my knowledge, and also a little entertaining.

This B-movie from Columbia is obviously an attempt to create a teen "star" of Margaret O'Brien, Oscar-winning child actress of several MGM classics from the 40s. It plays like a glorified 50s sitcom episode, complete with Elinor "Princess" Donahue in a supporting role. (Bizzarely, the story is by Herman "Winds of War" Wouk!)

The production is pedestrian, and not surprisingly, ended the feature teen-actress career of O'Brien, who has gone on to numerous TV guest spots throughout the years, and a current and unfortunate alliance with some performer named Randal Malone. (Check out her IMDb listing for further details.)

One would hope that some casting agent or producer out there, could find her a great episode of "ER" or "Law & Order," or some such series. I've purposely avoided her last two Z movies, as she deserves considerably better than the direct-to-video, no-budget "Dead Season."

Unlike the other reviewers I thought this movie was good fun, but then I've always enjoyed the older movies from the 40's and 50's. Yes, this movie is not an Academy Award contender but one must also remember the time period in which this was filmed. It was a much different world then and the types of situations the characters in this movie find themselves in were very "serious" back then. Margaret O'Brien more than holds her own, as did Eleanor Donahue in her role. I didn't realize she was ever a blonde! All in all, if you find yourself in the mood to watch a movie from a much simpler time in our history then I'd suggest you pop some popcorn, grab a quilt, sit back and enjoy the movie for what it is.

I came as a fan of the novel to this adaptation, not as a fan of one of the actors or actresses. Though the others found this movie using an actress at an awkward time in her life, I felt the movie awkward in it's adaptation of the novel.

In "The City Boy" Herbie Bookbinder is the main character whereas the film focuses on his older sister. This was extremely disappointing. My introduction to the book was at school. We read a large excerpt of the book that was billed as "Herbie's Ride". Although it was only the middle part of The City Boy, it was enough to get me to seek the entire novel.

The movie is not really about Herbie nor his friend Cliff. The novel parallels, though not equals, Tom Sawyer in it's intention, perhaps as a prequel to a coming of age tale. The movie spends a great amount of time in the city before camp, thus for me, losing it's great boyhood adventure appeal.

On it's own merit, aside from loving the novel, I give the movie 3 of 5 stars. It's fine. There are enough details taken from the novel to give that sense of familiarity without complete failure.

I am glad Herman Wouk says he never saw the movie. He would have been greatly disappointed in it's approach to the story. I now believe the other reviewers have it correct when they indicate the movie was made for a child star and not for integrity to the book.