Un vagabundo es liberado de la cárcel por un abogado que lo contrata para hacerse pasar por un millonario hasta que este sea declarado muerto y se resuelva la herencia. Sin embargo, pronto d... Leer todoUn vagabundo es liberado de la cárcel por un abogado que lo contrata para hacerse pasar por un millonario hasta que este sea declarado muerto y se resuelva la herencia. Sin embargo, pronto descubre que las cosas no son lo que parecen.Un vagabundo es liberado de la cárcel por un abogado que lo contrata para hacerse pasar por un millonario hasta que este sea declarado muerto y se resuelva la herencia. Sin embargo, pronto descubre que las cosas no son lo que parecen.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Cop
- (sin créditos)
- Vagrant
- (sin créditos)
- Bailiff
- (sin créditos)
- Judge
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
David must fool the man's brother, sister-in-law, and wife...oh! And his dog, Angel. Angel is a beautiful dog too, who is only kept at bay by the smell of her owner's clothing and the non-threatening nature of David.
It's clear from the minute he sets foot on the property that things aren't as they seem...this is both a missing person and a murder mystery, but the biggest question is can David get out alive?
I enjoyed this mysterious noir. I appreciated that they answered all the questions in the end. This is a recommendation to noir fans. It may not be in the top tier but it was a great house and a good watch.
This, after all directed by Richard L. Bare, and at that time he was best known for Warner's Joe McDoakes shorts. After that closed down in 1956, he mostly directed TV shows like Green Acres, although he continued to turn out the occasional feature film with something odd about it, like being done entirely in split screen. Bare directs this one capably enough. The performances are good, the camerawork by Carl Guthrie makes me wonder if, given this script, Bare rolled his eyes and decided to make this a blank-faced burlesque. With Viveca Lindfors, Janet Paige, and Monte Blue.
Viveca Lindfors Stunning beauty ......was a Swedish-born actress whose stage and screen career in the U. S. and Sweden spanned more than half a century. She was brought to Hollywood in 1946 by Warner Brothers in the hope that she would be a new Greta Garbo or Ingrid Bergman.
When David is picked up for vagrancy, someone pays his fine, and has a proposition for him: He is to pretend to be a millionaire, who had disappeared several years prior. Even the millionaire's wife can't tell he is an impostor, but things start to go wrong. The man he is impersonating wasn't very well liked, and David must find out why. Viveca Lindfors gets top billing as "the wife", but it's Janis Paige as the sister- in-law who (rightfully) steals the show. Watch for Monte Blue as the Sheriff. The acting isn't anything special, but the story is mildly compelling, and since we know right from the start that David ends up in the well, we get hooked on finding out how he ends up there.
Written by Richard Sale, who had several novels and screenplays made into films. This one IS available on DVD, although you can catch it on Turner Classic Channel about once a year. Directed by Richard Bare, who wrote a book on the proper technique on film directing.
However, being a lover of all Film Noir I must say that the story is a solid little Thriller, well written and acted by all concerned.
I'm not familiar with the director and I don't know if he did many films, but I felt he did an excellent job setting up the situation and then slowly and steadily building the suspense and tension as you begin to realize what is happening.
I'm also not familiar at all with the star, but he really did a great job and portrayed his character in a very believable and sympathetic way. The dialog was not forced or overly 'Noirish' at all, but very natural and fit well with the ongoing story.
So, although I usually prefer the more Dark, Moody, stylish Noirs of the period, I must say that this simple little story was very effective and quite entertaining.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My Particular Way of Rating:
5 - Flawed, but perhaps with some entertainment value.
6. A decently passable story maybe worth a watch.
7. A solid film, well made, effective, and entertaining.
And, obviously, you can probably figure out what above and below these would mean... : )
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaProduced in October and November of 1948, but not released until June of 1950.
- ErroresWhile in the garden with Nadine, David takes her hands from around his neck. It is at this point that she notices he has no scar from when his brother used a knife on him in his boyhood. She noticed this in the dark, in the garden, where there are no lights, which is most improbable.
- Citas
Philip Cagle: [encountering Cummins as he has just been released from jail for vagrancy] Better out here, isn't it?
David Cummins: You paid my fine.
Philip Cagle: You're abrupt, Mr. Cummins, but true.
David Cummins: Is there any reason I should thank you?
Philip Cagle: I talk better over a cup of coffee, how 'bout you?
David Cummins: That depends on what I have to talk about.
Philip Cagle: I paid fifty dollars to get you out here, the least you can do is let me tell you why I did it.
Philip Cagle: Fifty dollars for me? Inflation's here to stay.
[gets into the car]
Selecciones populares
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- This Side of the Law
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 14 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1