Hermanos de sangre

Enjoyable Warner Bros western directed by a "home" director for the studio, Edwin Marin who, like his fellow studio director Ray Enright, spent his entire career - at least mostly - in Warner and specialized in westerns and also film noirs, crime dramas - not Enright though, only westerns. But both also made dramas or comedies. Both had parallel paths in movie business and also had the same age. Warner westerns were all fast paced, the studio trademark, but most of the time suffering from predictable schemes, despite the always excellent directing and performances. Randolh Scott was often present in those gems. Here the topic focuses on those Younger brothers outlaws, and we can imagine what could have been done with a bigger budget. That remains an efficient B movie. Warner western typical stuff.

An outlaw gang's hopes of a pardon are threatened when they're framed for crimes they didn't commit.

Promised their freedom if they keep out of trouble; paroled bank robbers Cole (Morris); Jim (Bruce Bennett) and Bob Younger (James Brown) join kid brother Johnny (Hutton) in Cedar Creek; Minnesota; unaware that their troubles have already begun. Set up by Daniel Ryckman (Fred Clark); an ex-Pinkerton cop who claims they cost him his job; Johnny is falsely accused of murder; while sultry bandit Kate Shepherd (Paige) robs a bank and makes Cole her fall guy.

The Younger Brothers travels a well worn trail in the "outlaw" western genre - and here the brothers are trying to keep on the straight and narrow, but this being a western with a modicum of chases and gunsmoke, for them that's going to be hard to achieve- especially with a vengeful ex-Pinkerton man and Janis Paige - a lady bandit - trying to scupper their chances to change. These two are the most interesting characters and what drives this rather routine yet efficiently made film. However, it's fuse doesn't always burns bright, it lacks a little punch, the colour tone is too dark, but it's entertaining with some good acting and a sufficiently constructed plot.

Interesting story idea... the brothers who had ridden with the james gang want to go straight. They have been paroled, and want to keep clean until the hearing. But things don't always go as planned. The townies interfere, and make sure that things get more complicated for them. Including kate (janis paige). She still wants revenge for things that happened in the past. Fun co-stars... alan hale was in every black and white film ever made. Monte blue, fred clark. Gun fights. Romance, bank robberies, waiting around. All leading up to the hearing. Directed by edwin marin. Died young at 52. Hale died young at 57. Both passed away just a couple years after making this film. The lead, wayne morris died young at 45, ten years later. Geraldine brooks died at 51. Fred clark died at 54. Tom tyler died at 50. Cursed cast.

The Younger brothers were overshadowed in life by the James brothers and this has continued to be reflected in movies.Pictures where they have taken centre screen have been of a lesser quality than movies where they have played second fiddle to the James boys. This is a pretty dire Western ,one which depicts the notorious outlaws as saintly ,put -upon figures striving to remain within the law but hounded by a former Pinkerton agent who blames them for his lost job and for his crippled leg.Also striving to ensnare them is a woman outlaw who wants them as part of her bank robbery gang Stolidly acted by a second string cast and directed with little or no passion this is at least brief and can boast a lively musical score. Otherwise it is so routine as to be forgettable almost as soon as it ends.

This is one incredibly standard western, that features some bad acting, dull storyline and silly action.

Biggest problem perhaps is how incredibly formulaic this movie is. It features all of the usual clichés, yes even a bar fight and the movie really doesn't has any surprises in it. It makes this a dull and a weak western to watch, also not in the least because it's such a poorly made one.

It's obviously a small production and the movie looks like it got shot in 30 days. The directing and editing can be called bad and all of the action sequences featured in the movie are incredibly silly. It perhaps almost becomes a bit humorous to watch, for all the wrong reasons.

Its story also isn't that interesting. It's a pretty friendly western (so also no blood), in which for some odd reason everybody seems to be against the Younger brothers, who in this movie are being portrayed as good and very friendly guys. The story gets sillier and sillier as it heads toward its ending. The Younger brothers really existed and were part of the James-Younger gang, of which the famous brothers Frank and Jesse James were also part of. Of course they were not as friendly in real life as portrayed in this movie. It just was custom for an early '40's to have likable man characters in it. It wasn't really until the Spagethi-western age really that the main characters became rotten criminals themselves really. Strangely enough that approached has always worked out better than those early western's in which the main character is on the good side of the law.

Thing that does make this movie original is the fact that it was shot in color. This was something pretty unique for an '40's western and still gives the movie something extra. You can wonder though, why they shot this western in full color. The movie is still done in the style of a black & white early western after all and I actually believe that this movie would had been a bit more credible if it got done in black & white instead.

You could easily do without this western.

4/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/