CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.8/10
521
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaSpurned by the married county attorney she loves, the wife of a newspaperman tries every trick to lift her husband into a political career at the expense of her would-be lover and the she-la... Leer todoSpurned by the married county attorney she loves, the wife of a newspaperman tries every trick to lift her husband into a political career at the expense of her would-be lover and the she-lawyer he illicitly falls for.Spurned by the married county attorney she loves, the wife of a newspaperman tries every trick to lift her husband into a political career at the expense of her would-be lover and the she-lawyer he illicitly falls for.
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Erville Alderson
- Sam
- (sin créditos)
Brandon Beach
- Party Guest
- (sin créditos)
Guy Beach
- Hack Driver
- (sin créditos)
Oliver Blake
- Mr. Reynolds
- (sin créditos)
Chet Brandenburg
- Juror
- (sin créditos)
John Breen
- Trial Spectator
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Cornell Wilde is the county attorney in the small Kansas town of Jericho. His best friend is Kirk Douglas, the editor of the local newspaper. Wilde is running for Congress, but the appearance of Anne Baxter, who left town a child and has come back a lawyer, stops Wilde from running. He does not wish to go to Washington with his always angry wife, Ann Dvorak. Instead, Douglas and his gossipy wife, Linda Darnell go to Congress, and Miss Baxter leaves for Kansas City rather than begin a "tawdry, backstreet affair." But when Colleen Townsend is accused of murdering a man in Jericho. Miss Baxter calls in Wilde to get her back to Jericho and assist in the defense.... despite the gossip.
It's director John Stahl's last tear jerker, a genre he excelled in in the 1930s. He would round off his career with two light comedies and die in 1950 at the age of 63. At first I wondered why Stahl had been the choice for this movie, instead of 20th Century-Fox's resident master of small-town life, Henry King. The answer soon became clear. The set pieces that open the movie are looks at the neighborhoods and relationships during the Mauve Decade that offer edgy, disapproving looks at the small-minded and evilly gossipy people who make the venue a purgatory, even as sentimental songs come out of Victrolas and pianolas. Stahl excelled in the portrayal of nastiness under the calm facade. King liked small towns.
I didn't enjoy the movie much. This sort of weeper has never been my cup of tea, and the big ending with a trial, a shooting, and Wilde lying in a hospital bed, possibly dying (surely not in a Hollywood movie!) was way over the top for me. But there's no arguing that Stahl's acerbic attitude toward the "nice" people is on full display here.
It's director John Stahl's last tear jerker, a genre he excelled in in the 1930s. He would round off his career with two light comedies and die in 1950 at the age of 63. At first I wondered why Stahl had been the choice for this movie, instead of 20th Century-Fox's resident master of small-town life, Henry King. The answer soon became clear. The set pieces that open the movie are looks at the neighborhoods and relationships during the Mauve Decade that offer edgy, disapproving looks at the small-minded and evilly gossipy people who make the venue a purgatory, even as sentimental songs come out of Victrolas and pianolas. Stahl excelled in the portrayal of nastiness under the calm facade. King liked small towns.
I didn't enjoy the movie much. This sort of weeper has never been my cup of tea, and the big ending with a trial, a shooting, and Wilde lying in a hospital bed, possibly dying (surely not in a Hollywood movie!) was way over the top for me. But there's no arguing that Stahl's acerbic attitude toward the "nice" people is on full display here.
In spite of the title ,the movie has nothing to do with Joshua and the Bible ;it's closer to film noir than to melodrama ,like "leave her to heaven " which already featured Cornel Wilde ; but in spite of its high rating , it cannot be mentioned in the same breath as the Stahl /Wilde/Gene Tierney's tour de force in 1946 ;even "the foxes of Harrow (1947) had a better screenplay .
It pits Wilde /Baxter 's idealism against Darnell/Douglas' careerism ;in consequence,the movie really takes place in the second part of the movie, when poor Marjorie might be sacrificed to political ambitions : here the movie thoroughly belongs to Anne Baxter ,who alone against the world of the high and the mighty ,shows an unexpected stamina and strength of character :at a time when ,most of the time, women had minor roles in the courts of justice ,the movie can be considered ,from that point of view, a successful effort.
It pits Wilde /Baxter 's idealism against Darnell/Douglas' careerism ;in consequence,the movie really takes place in the second part of the movie, when poor Marjorie might be sacrificed to political ambitions : here the movie thoroughly belongs to Anne Baxter ,who alone against the world of the high and the mighty ,shows an unexpected stamina and strength of character :at a time when ,most of the time, women had minor roles in the courts of justice ,the movie can be considered ,from that point of view, a successful effort.
This is a very local soap opera in a small town in the midwest where everyone knows everybody and boredom is escaped by garden parties and rural balls with pianolas, while there is some trouble brewing under the surface. The county attorney Cornel Wilde is married to Ann Dvorak, an alcoholic, and the leading town nespaper man Kirk Douglas brings a bombshell beauty for a wife to town called Linda Darnell. She outshines everyone else and is the most dangerous of all. Gradually Anne Baxter sails up to challenge her in the last moment, but then this surprisingly good film has already advanced into high gear drama ending up in a murder trial.
At first you will suspect that the argument will be about drinking problems, especially as Kirk makes an issue of it in his paper and Cornel's wife never shows herself except when drunk. Neither couple has any children. Kirk is the one who at an early stage wonders why any man should ever marry a woman, and his question proves reasonable, when it is all too late.
Alfred Newman provides the music, always amazingly reliably excellent, and the environment of a small midwest very conventional town around 1910 is endearingly charming. You will be surprised to find such a small local world being able to come up with such a very intriguing drama.
At first you will suspect that the argument will be about drinking problems, especially as Kirk makes an issue of it in his paper and Cornel's wife never shows herself except when drunk. Neither couple has any children. Kirk is the one who at an early stage wonders why any man should ever marry a woman, and his question proves reasonable, when it is all too late.
Alfred Newman provides the music, always amazingly reliably excellent, and the environment of a small midwest very conventional town around 1910 is endearingly charming. You will be surprised to find such a small local world being able to come up with such a very intriguing drama.
I applaud any movie that has a lot of dramatic incidents but doesn't spill over into melodrama. This is one that fits the bill! Between the alcoholism, unhappy marriages, potential adulterous affairs, town scandals, and a murder trial, it was never overdone or overacted. There are a lot of familiar faces here (Cornell Wilde, Anne Baxter, Kirk Douglas, Linda Darnell, Ann Dvorak, barton MacLane) and they all play their parts well.
Anyone would want to see these walls of Jericho come tumbling down ("Where are you, Joshua?"), ones that keep you in a bad marriage, make you the victim of vicious gossip, and keep you from someone you love.
The ending is left rather ambiguous, as the way it's shown, you're not quite sure if it's going to be happy or sad. I'm opting for happy!
Anyone would want to see these walls of Jericho come tumbling down ("Where are you, Joshua?"), ones that keep you in a bad marriage, make you the victim of vicious gossip, and keep you from someone you love.
The ending is left rather ambiguous, as the way it's shown, you're not quite sure if it's going to be happy or sad. I'm opting for happy!
If you like watching movies that are easy to predict and formulaic...well, this film is not for you! The plot has many unusual twists and turns and it's one of the more unusual Hollywood films of the era.
The story is set in the town of Jericho. Dave Connors (Cornell Wilde) is a very decent man...working hard as a county prosecutor. And, he's easy to like and you find yourself rooting for the guy. The problem is that he's married to a nasty drunk (Ann Dvorak), but he makes the best of it. Even when an old lady friend of his returns to town and she clearly is in love with him and vice-versa, he resists the urge and avoids the woman because he is a faithful, decent man. In addition to this lady coming back to Jericho, an old friend (Kirk Douglas) comes with his gorgeous wife (Linda Darnell)...and she, also, seems very interested in Dave. So where is this all going to end? I bet you couldn't predict it in your lifetime unless you see the film!
I give this film high marks for originality and acting. While Wilde never rose to the upper echelons of actors, he was excellent here...as was everyone. An interesting and often overlooked film from Twentieth Century-Fox that deserves to be seen.
The story is set in the town of Jericho. Dave Connors (Cornell Wilde) is a very decent man...working hard as a county prosecutor. And, he's easy to like and you find yourself rooting for the guy. The problem is that he's married to a nasty drunk (Ann Dvorak), but he makes the best of it. Even when an old lady friend of his returns to town and she clearly is in love with him and vice-versa, he resists the urge and avoids the woman because he is a faithful, decent man. In addition to this lady coming back to Jericho, an old friend (Kirk Douglas) comes with his gorgeous wife (Linda Darnell)...and she, also, seems very interested in Dave. So where is this all going to end? I bet you couldn't predict it in your lifetime unless you see the film!
I give this film high marks for originality and acting. While Wilde never rose to the upper echelons of actors, he was excellent here...as was everyone. An interesting and often overlooked film from Twentieth Century-Fox that deserves to be seen.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaGene Tierney was originally cast as Julia Norman.
- Citas
Julia Norman: You do a lot of things well, David. Lying is not one of them.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Walls of Jericho?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 46 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta