CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.0/10
542
TU CALIFICACIÓN
En 1842, en un Oregón sin ley, un pistolero busca venganza después de que su hermano inocente sea linchado y su bella esposa india sea reclamada por el tirano local.En 1842, en un Oregón sin ley, un pistolero busca venganza después de que su hermano inocente sea linchado y su bella esposa india sea reclamada por el tirano local.En 1842, en un Oregón sin ley, un pistolero busca venganza después de que su hermano inocente sea linchado y su bella esposa india sea reclamada por el tirano local.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Robert J. Wilke
- Sile Doty
- (as Robert Wilke)
John Gavin
- Dan Kirby
- (as John Gilmore)
Beulah Archuletta
- Indian Woman
- (sin créditos)
Emile Avery
- Montgomery Rider
- (sin créditos)
Rudy Bowman
- Townsman
- (sin créditos)
Gertrude Chorre
- Indian
- (sin créditos)
Paul Fierro
- Frenchie the Bartender
- (sin créditos)
Bob Hoy
- Five Crows
- (sin créditos)
Opiniones destacadas
This is really a shame that director John Sherwood gave us only three films: this one, CREATURE WALKS AMONG US and MONOLITH MONSTERS. This western is very unusual concerning not the cast but the topic. It is very smart of have shown how West was in those times, where there were so few women for so many men. And no one can miss a western starring the flaming Yvonne De Carlo, co starring here Mara Corday and the likes of Neville Brand, Rory Calhoun. Excellent directing, excellent locations, settings, and for a short length, only seventy five minutes. Not a masterpiece but an Universal western to remember.
It all starts in Oregon, where Herbert Ruddey is in charge. Women are chattel, and when his chattel, Mara Corday, says she was attacked, the man gets strung up. Up rides the dead man's brother, Rory Calhoun, who wrangles with all the men who want to rape Yvonne De Carlo, and to gain his revenge on Rudley.
It's the first feature directed by John Sherwood, and a clear indicator of why he would direct only two more. The movie seems to be put together in bits and pieces, shot entirely on sets -- although it was not -- and populated with the good-looking but mediocre at best performers which Universal kept foisting on the audiences in the 1950s between Sirk soapers. Everyone is brightly lit, showing off their spotless attire and perfectly coifed heads after they've ridden miles on the dusty trail, and while the script is far from the standard patterns of the B westerns of a decade earlier, it's all surface tension, with occasional musical stings from the library to try to raise the emotional level.
I suppose it was cheap enough that Universal showed a profit on it, or at least broke even, but I'd rather look at a Buster Crabbe B. At least he's having a good time watching Al St. John's antics, and not the dour and stupid characters here.
It's the first feature directed by John Sherwood, and a clear indicator of why he would direct only two more. The movie seems to be put together in bits and pieces, shot entirely on sets -- although it was not -- and populated with the good-looking but mediocre at best performers which Universal kept foisting on the audiences in the 1950s between Sirk soapers. Everyone is brightly lit, showing off their spotless attire and perfectly coifed heads after they've ridden miles on the dusty trail, and while the script is far from the standard patterns of the B westerns of a decade earlier, it's all surface tension, with occasional musical stings from the library to try to raise the emotional level.
I suppose it was cheap enough that Universal showed a profit on it, or at least broke even, but I'd rather look at a Buster Crabbe B. At least he's having a good time watching Al St. John's antics, and not the dour and stupid characters here.
A little sinister, dark, slow and boring. Not a winning combination for a matinee style western.
This movie is light on for action and plot or even story development. The bad guys are pretty mild and Rory just seems to be going through his paces on this one.
The ending is also a fail.
There are plenty of great westerns out there you can enjoy, sadly this isn't one of them.
This movie is light on for action and plot or even story development. The bad guys are pretty mild and Rory just seems to be going through his paces on this one.
The ending is also a fail.
There are plenty of great westerns out there you can enjoy, sadly this isn't one of them.
I read the reviews here and wonder if anyone has a different interpretation. This movie is about the dark side of human nature where everyone is for themselves. I'm not sure if that message will catch but it will in another light if you consider more recent films such as the Dark Knight movies or the Man With No Name trilogy. In many movies, there are no real heroes. So even the women in this movie don't have emotional reaction when something tragic happens to a close person. The hero Tex Kirby comes back for revenge of his brother, or is it? Paca who loses her husband finds an cold unexpected way to get revenge. The Indian maids who leave Hannah (Yvonne De Carlo) and the ranch are neutral characters but still, they do what's best in their interest. So at the end, it is easy for Hannah to have no love lost and be willing to leave with the hero.
The wild west was an arena where you had to watch your back. The setting was a wild 1842 Oregon where there are no rules. It was lawless and you defended yourself. Even those you think you can trust, can you really trust them? The rancher who makes the rules, Gerald Montgomery makes very harsh rules. Take a woman like she is property if she has no husband. One evil character shoots his father in the back. No one cries in this movie. Violence, lawlessness and war dull the emotions. We know that where even young children exposed to war get emotionally insensitive to death. It is unusually violent for a movie in the mid-50s depicting rape, murder (of relatives), treachery and lawlessness. It seems really that the Yakima Indians are the only ones with a code, law or ethics.
A question is what degrees of evil and selfishness are there?
If you watch the movie with this in mind, you can see the message. But most people won't see it that way, but will get confused by the mindless violence and unemotional characters. In this way, it's an unusual minor masterpiece.
The evil characters are definitely fun. Overall, supporting roles are well-acted but the leads are very average. The script does not lead to a clearer message and a viewer could get lost in its meaninglessness. Other than the message and supporting actors, the movie is fairly average. So an average rating might be 5-6 for me, but the supporting actors and dark message are fascinating and bump it to a 7 even 7.5. If you don't understand it, it's a 5 or 6.
The wild west was an arena where you had to watch your back. The setting was a wild 1842 Oregon where there are no rules. It was lawless and you defended yourself. Even those you think you can trust, can you really trust them? The rancher who makes the rules, Gerald Montgomery makes very harsh rules. Take a woman like she is property if she has no husband. One evil character shoots his father in the back. No one cries in this movie. Violence, lawlessness and war dull the emotions. We know that where even young children exposed to war get emotionally insensitive to death. It is unusually violent for a movie in the mid-50s depicting rape, murder (of relatives), treachery and lawlessness. It seems really that the Yakima Indians are the only ones with a code, law or ethics.
A question is what degrees of evil and selfishness are there?
If you watch the movie with this in mind, you can see the message. But most people won't see it that way, but will get confused by the mindless violence and unemotional characters. In this way, it's an unusual minor masterpiece.
The evil characters are definitely fun. Overall, supporting roles are well-acted but the leads are very average. The script does not lead to a clearer message and a viewer could get lost in its meaninglessness. Other than the message and supporting actors, the movie is fairly average. So an average rating might be 5-6 for me, but the supporting actors and dark message are fascinating and bump it to a 7 even 7.5. If you don't understand it, it's a 5 or 6.
Set in the days of the Oregon Territory, Raw Edge is one of your more adult westerns made during the Fifties at a time when westerns were trying to compete with westerns shown on television. The Saturday matinée kids of the Thirties and Forties did not see westerns that were about sex.
John Gavin married to Mara Corday insults Yvonne DeCarlo in the eyes of her husband Herbert Rudley who is the local Ponderosa owner in the area. But this guy has a lot more power than Ben Cartwright ever dreamed of. He's a veritable medieval lord of the manor and he's in charge of the women who in pioneer Oregon are the most valuable commodity around.
Gavin is hung as per Lord Rudley's orders and Mara Corday who is a mixed racial women is then 'assigned' to Robert J. Wilkie also per Lord Rudley's orders. That's how it is in his part of Oregon.
That is until former Texas Ranger Rory Calhoun arrives in town and is greeted with his brother's lifeless swinging body. He wants answers and wants them now.
Which presents a peculiar conundrum for a lot of people. They're all under Rudley's thumb, but they also realize that there's still a shortage of women and Yvonne DeCarlo's one most desirable woman. And she'd also be a wealthy widow. And Corday has a tribe of relations ready to take up her cause as well.
All in all Raw Edge with its emphasis on sex and women as valuable commodities is an unusual, but entertaining western. Besides those I've mentioned look for good performances from Rex Reason as a cynical gambler and a father and son pair of lowlifes, Emile Meyer and Neville Brand.
Definitely one adult western.
John Gavin married to Mara Corday insults Yvonne DeCarlo in the eyes of her husband Herbert Rudley who is the local Ponderosa owner in the area. But this guy has a lot more power than Ben Cartwright ever dreamed of. He's a veritable medieval lord of the manor and he's in charge of the women who in pioneer Oregon are the most valuable commodity around.
Gavin is hung as per Lord Rudley's orders and Mara Corday who is a mixed racial women is then 'assigned' to Robert J. Wilkie also per Lord Rudley's orders. That's how it is in his part of Oregon.
That is until former Texas Ranger Rory Calhoun arrives in town and is greeted with his brother's lifeless swinging body. He wants answers and wants them now.
Which presents a peculiar conundrum for a lot of people. They're all under Rudley's thumb, but they also realize that there's still a shortage of women and Yvonne DeCarlo's one most desirable woman. And she'd also be a wealthy widow. And Corday has a tribe of relations ready to take up her cause as well.
All in all Raw Edge with its emphasis on sex and women as valuable commodities is an unusual, but entertaining western. Besides those I've mentioned look for good performances from Rex Reason as a cynical gambler and a father and son pair of lowlifes, Emile Meyer and Neville Brand.
Definitely one adult western.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFilm debut of John Gavin, credited as John Gilmore.
- ConexionesReferenced in Hollywood Rocks the Movies: The Early Years (1955-1970) (2000)
- Bandas sonorasRAW EDGE
Written and Performed by Terry Gilkyson
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 17 minutos
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta