CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.0/10
340
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaIn 1856, San Francisco is the scene of political battles between criminal organizations led by corrupt politicians and vigilante committees formed by honest citizens.In 1856, San Francisco is the scene of political battles between criminal organizations led by corrupt politicians and vigilante committees formed by honest citizens.In 1856, San Francisco is the scene of political battles between criminal organizations led by corrupt politicians and vigilante committees formed by honest citizens.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Ralph Dumke
- Winfield Holbert
- (as Ralph E. Dumke)
Abdullah Abbas
- Barfly
- (sin créditos)
Walter Bacon
- Barfly
- (sin créditos)
Trevor Bardette
- Miner
- (sin créditos)
John Barton
- Barfly
- (sin créditos)
Willie Bloom
- Barfly
- (sin créditos)
Rudy Bowman
- Juror
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Joel McCrea is just reassuring. He delivers a strong performance and you feel secure in his hands as you watch the movie. He's just reliable as the actor and the character - very consistent.
It does a good job showing the vigilante system during a rough period. There was much justice to be achieved, and much corruption. Killing was frequent.
It would be good to see a little more character development between McCrea and De Carlo, the romantic leads. I would have liked to have known more backstory about him and his past, as well as her's. How did she get so mixed up with someone like Cain, trying to take over the whole state.?
While I did believe her's and McCrea's connection, is she to be trusted for the longterm? Will she just change? How will she adjust to life at the mines, returning with McCrea to his work? She's had a very exciting life with the villain Cain, in beautiful homes, political campaigns, and surrounded by tons of ambition she admitted she liked. Will McCrea's character have enough ambition and drive for her? While it's great to see them together at the end, would Rick go back to just "having fun" and she go back to a more ambitious life? That would seem the case, but we should hope and believe that they found true love. And then therefore they changed.
There are some superb scenes..... an escape from being Shanghaied through water, boats and taverns; understanding how Vigilantes worked; and amazement at the sense of lawlessness and Killings that can occur in the wild west of the 1880s.
A compelling well thought story, clear, committed characters, twists and turns, strong resolution at the end. It also has a lot of great comedic events!
A very good movie, easy to watch, and very enjoyable.
It does a good job showing the vigilante system during a rough period. There was much justice to be achieved, and much corruption. Killing was frequent.
It would be good to see a little more character development between McCrea and De Carlo, the romantic leads. I would have liked to have known more backstory about him and his past, as well as her's. How did she get so mixed up with someone like Cain, trying to take over the whole state.?
While I did believe her's and McCrea's connection, is she to be trusted for the longterm? Will she just change? How will she adjust to life at the mines, returning with McCrea to his work? She's had a very exciting life with the villain Cain, in beautiful homes, political campaigns, and surrounded by tons of ambition she admitted she liked. Will McCrea's character have enough ambition and drive for her? While it's great to see them together at the end, would Rick go back to just "having fun" and she go back to a more ambitious life? That would seem the case, but we should hope and believe that they found true love. And then therefore they changed.
There are some superb scenes..... an escape from being Shanghaied through water, boats and taverns; understanding how Vigilantes worked; and amazement at the sense of lawlessness and Killings that can occur in the wild west of the 1880s.
A compelling well thought story, clear, committed characters, twists and turns, strong resolution at the end. It also has a lot of great comedic events!
A very good movie, easy to watch, and very enjoyable.
This is sort of a desultory effort on the part of the star, Joel McCrea, a man who usually takes command of a scene merely by his presence, but here looks tired and like he would rather be on his own ranch instead of this talky, studio-bound production. The thing probably looked good on paper--and if you've got the knowing sultriness of Yvonne DeCarlo, things are set up for some hot romance, at the very least. But the script is a little unfocused, and there's a lot of chatter about the legal Vigilante group, and Sidney Blackmer attempts to show some menace by mouthing menacing lines--but for an action-packed Western or a thoughtful revisionist history lesson, this effort falls flat, and would be a loss leader except for two brilliant, lively scenes with character actor Florence Bates, sporting an eye patch and plenty of life as her own Shanghai Lil (helped along by a massive, silent Tor Johnson) and this viewer perked up and wondered how the rest never recovered; even the final confrontation lacks either suspense or tension, and just allows almost everybody to go home quietly.
The only real positive distinction this movie has is Joel McCrea in the lead. He was terrific in westerns and he's very good in the this one. However, the plot is not great. 95% of all westerns basically boil down to 3 or 4 plots...and this one has the big baddie who is trying to take over the new state of California. Yep, Andrew Cain is yet ANOTHER big greedy baddie...a plot seriously overused in westerns. And, not surprisingly, there is a hot babe who comes between the two men (Yvonne DeCarlo).
While the acting is good an makes up for the dullness of the plot, there is something that retired history teachers would not like about this film--the highly inaccurate details. The guns are all circa 1870s and the set clearly is a typical western set--but it's supposed to be San Franciso in the 1850s. Hand guns were almost never revolvers and very few folks in the town would have been walking about in cowboy apparel. After all, by then it was an up and coming coastal city...not Deadwood or some other western locale.
So is this one worth seeing? Well, possibly. McCrea is great...he almost always is. But the plot might be too familiar and you need to look past the fact that it's not at all historically accurate.
While the acting is good an makes up for the dullness of the plot, there is something that retired history teachers would not like about this film--the highly inaccurate details. The guns are all circa 1870s and the set clearly is a typical western set--but it's supposed to be San Franciso in the 1850s. Hand guns were almost never revolvers and very few folks in the town would have been walking about in cowboy apparel. After all, by then it was an up and coming coastal city...not Deadwood or some other western locale.
So is this one worth seeing? Well, possibly. McCrea is great...he almost always is. But the plot might be too familiar and you need to look past the fact that it's not at all historically accurate.
In his younger days Joel McCrea made a trip to frontier San Francisco in Samuel Goldwyn's Barbary Coast. A more mature McCrea makes a comeback in the Pacific city in The San Francisco Story, another film with some of the same plot elements.
In The San Francisco Story, McCrea and sidekick/partner Richard Erdman find themselves now prosperous mine owners and are in town for a little celebrating. Some years earlier McCrea was involved with the Vigilantes when law and order broke down there, but now he just wants to party hearty.
But newspaper owner/publisher Onslow Stevens wants McCrea involved with the Vigilantes again. A truly corrupt party boss played by Sidney Blackmer owns everything in the town including the cops and the courts, so the Vigilantes have been reactivated.
McCrea isn't crazy about opposing Blackmer, but when he sees Blackmer toting Yvonne DeCarlo on his arm, then it becomes a matter of hormones more than citizenship.
The San Francisco Story is a good fit for Joel McCrea in his B picture western period of his career. He gets solid support from the rest of the cast and one really to watch out for is Florence Bates who is playing a part Marie Dressler would have done years earlier as a waterfront character who Shanghais people for fun and profit, except if she likes you. She likes McCrea and what's not to like?
And there's not much to dislike in The San Francisco Story.
In The San Francisco Story, McCrea and sidekick/partner Richard Erdman find themselves now prosperous mine owners and are in town for a little celebrating. Some years earlier McCrea was involved with the Vigilantes when law and order broke down there, but now he just wants to party hearty.
But newspaper owner/publisher Onslow Stevens wants McCrea involved with the Vigilantes again. A truly corrupt party boss played by Sidney Blackmer owns everything in the town including the cops and the courts, so the Vigilantes have been reactivated.
McCrea isn't crazy about opposing Blackmer, but when he sees Blackmer toting Yvonne DeCarlo on his arm, then it becomes a matter of hormones more than citizenship.
The San Francisco Story is a good fit for Joel McCrea in his B picture western period of his career. He gets solid support from the rest of the cast and one really to watch out for is Florence Bates who is playing a part Marie Dressler would have done years earlier as a waterfront character who Shanghais people for fun and profit, except if she likes you. She likes McCrea and what's not to like?
And there's not much to dislike in The San Francisco Story.
All dressed in white ,except in the last sequences,Yvonne De Carlo reigns over the movie.At the time,IMHO,only Ava Gardner surpassed her in beauty.So we can forgive Robert Parish if he often forgets his script which is rather desultory for a western and anyway is not much interesting in the first place .You can't make new things out of (already) old :a tycoon who wants to have the whole town under his thumb (Sidney Blackmer was a fine villain,remember Roman Castevet?),shameless politician,bribery and corruption... and a noble hero played by aging Joel McCrea who could be De Carlo's father.His first line when he sees the hanged man is full of humor.
Parrish made better westerns in the late fifties such as "saddle the wind" and " the wonderful country".His foray into sci-fi gave an (overlooked) memorable movie: "Journey to the far side of the sun" aka "doppelganger".
Parrish made better westerns in the late fifties such as "saddle the wind" and " the wonderful country".His foray into sci-fi gave an (overlooked) memorable movie: "Journey to the far side of the sun" aka "doppelganger".
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- The San Francisco Story
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 20min(80 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta