The Frightened Man

This is not as good as a Rathbone/Bruce Sherlock Holmes movie,by any stretch of the imagination. That being said,it is still a good, entertaining film. The camera work is well-done. The plot is reasonably plausable and easy to follow. Overall,a suspenseful little gem of a movie. Well worth watching.

Dermot Walsh has just been sent down from Oxford. His father, Charles Victor, is disappointed, but puts a good face on it. Walsh can join him in his business! His son doesn't like it. The shop looks like a junk shop to him, with the very occasional valuable antique -- there's a pair of Ming vases he just got, which his assistant, Michael Ward, tells him is on the police list as stolen. There must be some mistake, says Victor.

The shop doesn't even cover all expenses. Victor has a couple of paying guests at his house. Walsh likes one very much: Barbara Murray. In fact, they disappear and he marries her, but he can't get a job, so Victor comes through with a check for fifty pounds and a secretarial job in Hatton Gardens. Actually, Walsh has been working for a local hood, and he comes up with a plan to steal a shipment of diamonds from Hatton Gardens.

It's a very twisty story from writer-director John Gilling, and the actors are up to their jobs. It's the sort of nasty crime story that pleases people: there have been lots of stories about robbing the jewelry district in London over the years, from smash-and-grab up to the one in 2015, when pensioners carted out most of one safety deposit vault over a holiday weekend -- that actually happened. I'm waiting to see a movie about that, but until I do, this dark little tale will do.

I saw this on the television last night. It is a good 1950's B-movie thriller. Whilst the plot is a bit hackneyed in places, it is well acted and well directed. If you like this sort of film it is well worth a viewing. If you are not a fan of this sort of film, but want to kill 69 minutes, it should do the job.

I just feel the need to begin by noting that the promotional poster/art for this film is very misleading and should be disregarded. Now, onto the film itself: I was anticipating something good but my expectations were greatly exceeded. The story itself is very solid and the script fully supports it through to its final conclusion. The entire cast does a fine job with Victor, Walsh, and Murray all delivering exceptional performances. Gilling does well in directing this thoroughly engaging and interesting film from beginning to end. Its is very British in all of the best ways and I can hardly think of a recent film that so thoroughly delivered such entertainment in such a short run time. The Frightened Man is definitely one to check out.

I watched this film on Talking Pictures a few weeks ago and I can only say that it had a good story line. Although I think with more famous and charismatic actors, along with higher production values, the film could have been one of the more popular films of the 1950s.

I will again emphasise that it was a very good story line, but more could have been done with the plot.

It was unusual to see Dermot Walsh as a delusional, misguided and inexperienced robber. He usually plays the noble hero. Many people of my age will remember him in the television series "Richard the Lionheart" in the early 1960s, which was very popular with a lot of children - the episodes were often reconstructed when we went out to play afterwards.

But going back to "The Frightened Man", maybe I have missed the point of the whole film - before I submit this review, I may have watch it again on the recording that I made of it.

The enlightening qualities of the film, as well as showing that crime does not pay - not very well anyway - it depicted the more seamier and less glamourous side of London in the early 1950s. Whereas other films such as "Doctor in the House" and "Genevieve" make the era look envious and make us all yearn for the "good old days" when life seemed a lot simpler, this film gave us the opposite view.

The film depicted people working hard to make enough money just to survive on. It showed grey buildings, still dilapidated after the effects of the Second World War - and if other films showed us how nice people were in those days, this film didn't - there were a lot of bad people around in those days.

However, the film had a neat twist at the end and the closing scenes were so poignant that I nearly had tears in my eyes.

Finally, I would like to say a few words about Charles Victor, a very undervalued character actor of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. If this film had been anything more than a 'B' picture and second programmer, his performance as an old Jewish, junk dealer, with contacts everywhere, would have been worthy of an Academy Award.