CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
1.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
David, recién salido de la cárcel, y Maggie, que ignora quien es el padre del hijo que espera, deciden unir sus destinos cuando tropiezan el uno con el otro en una estación ferroviaria.David, recién salido de la cárcel, y Maggie, que ignora quien es el padre del hijo que espera, deciden unir sus destinos cuando tropiezan el uno con el otro en una estación ferroviaria.David, recién salido de la cárcel, y Maggie, que ignora quien es el padre del hijo que espera, deciden unir sus destinos cuando tropiezan el uno con el otro en una estación ferroviaria.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Nils Alm
- Kafégäst (1)
- (sin créditos)
Bertil Anderberg
- Första poliskonstapeln
- (sin créditos)
Britta Billsten
- Åhörare i rättssalen (1)
- (sin créditos)
John W. Björling
- Kafégäst (2)
- (sin créditos)
Edvard Danielsson
- Portiern på Frälsningsarméns hotell
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
10satie-2
This is a romantic and exciting feel-good movie about a lovable naive couple with a questionable background, trying to start all over together and adapt themselves to the society. The young star director Ingmar Bergman here effectively portrays typically good and bad sides of the human behaviour. The main theme returns over and over again - how do people live with their past, and how do they handle the resulting conflicts and moral dilemmas? Despite the age of this movie (released in 1946) it does not feel old fashioned in any way. Common to Bergman's movies to come, this one is way ahead of its time. The story and acting feel just as fresh as any modern movie and is a pure enjoyment to watch, without any boring or embarrassing moments.
This feature, like Bergman's first' is a relatively simple melodrama. Both follow rather simple narratives about characters going through simple struggles. And yet, where his first one left me unmoved, this second film is at the very least Charming with also thought provoking commentary on Swedish society at best.
Like Birger Malmsten's character David says in the first minutes of the film, "Damn Society", or something along those lines at least. Time and time again our two lovers are confronted with unfortune from society and everytime they pull through and come out stronger, ending in a finally in court that felt satisfying to say the least.
While nothing too special in terms of Cinematography or anything like that I think this is a more than fine film and a good start for Bergman. It's funny to see these light hearted early films of him that feel almost out of place when compared to his dramatic works we now know would later follow. I guess the Swedish audiences at that time were more interested in light hearted films about love than deep ones about human nature and death and such.
3/5 Stars.
Like Birger Malmsten's character David says in the first minutes of the film, "Damn Society", or something along those lines at least. Time and time again our two lovers are confronted with unfortune from society and everytime they pull through and come out stronger, ending in a finally in court that felt satisfying to say the least.
While nothing too special in terms of Cinematography or anything like that I think this is a more than fine film and a good start for Bergman. It's funny to see these light hearted early films of him that feel almost out of place when compared to his dramatic works we now know would later follow. I guess the Swedish audiences at that time were more interested in light hearted films about love than deep ones about human nature and death and such.
3/5 Stars.
Ingmar Bergman is without a doubt one of the, if not likely to be considered the best filmmaker who ever lived.
Whilst most well known for his later works, beginning in the 1950s, he also made some great films in the 40s, this one being a good example of a great commentary on contemporary society and love.
The actors all do an incredible job, and the writing is masterful - as per usual with Bergman of course.
It showcases his brilliant cinematography, cutting and editing that is very characteristic for the director, and one that would often be found later in his works.
Overall, a beautiful piece that is definitely recommended for any lover of film and fans of Bergman.
Whilst most well known for his later works, beginning in the 1950s, he also made some great films in the 40s, this one being a good example of a great commentary on contemporary society and love.
The actors all do an incredible job, and the writing is masterful - as per usual with Bergman of course.
It showcases his brilliant cinematography, cutting and editing that is very characteristic for the director, and one that would often be found later in his works.
Overall, a beautiful piece that is definitely recommended for any lover of film and fans of Bergman.
'It rains on our love" (1946) is an early film by Ingmar Bergman. Bergman was a director who had to learn his trade so the film is worth watching , but it isn't great.
The film is about two vagabonds, a man (David played by Birger Malmsten, a regular actor in Bergman films up till 1950) and a women (Maggi played by Barbro Kollberg), that are treated roughly by society. Of course (representatives of) society do see that differently. In their view the vagabonds fail to adapt to society's norms.
Films about vagabonds always remind me of "the little tramp", the ultimate vagabond, most certainly if a stray dog is involved, as is the case in "It rains on our love". See also "A dog's life" (1918, Charlie Chaplin). Chaplin however was much more competent in finding the right mix between comedy and sentimentality than the young Bergman, and also than the mature Bergman I guess, because Bergman quit making films in this genre after a while.
The film ends with a courtroom scene, and this is one of the most memorable scenes of the film. In the beginning the two vagabonds are on trial, but when their lawyer starts his defence the roles are quickly reversed and it almost seems that society is on trial.
This lawyer (Gosta Cederlund) is a remarkable appearance in "It rains on our love". He starts as a sort of narrator / guradian angel and all of a sudden becomes a character. Most unusual!
The film is about two vagabonds, a man (David played by Birger Malmsten, a regular actor in Bergman films up till 1950) and a women (Maggi played by Barbro Kollberg), that are treated roughly by society. Of course (representatives of) society do see that differently. In their view the vagabonds fail to adapt to society's norms.
Films about vagabonds always remind me of "the little tramp", the ultimate vagabond, most certainly if a stray dog is involved, as is the case in "It rains on our love". See also "A dog's life" (1918, Charlie Chaplin). Chaplin however was much more competent in finding the right mix between comedy and sentimentality than the young Bergman, and also than the mature Bergman I guess, because Bergman quit making films in this genre after a while.
The film ends with a courtroom scene, and this is one of the most memorable scenes of the film. In the beginning the two vagabonds are on trial, but when their lawyer starts his defence the roles are quickly reversed and it almost seems that society is on trial.
This lawyer (Gosta Cederlund) is a remarkable appearance in "It rains on our love". He starts as a sort of narrator / guradian angel and all of a sudden becomes a character. Most unusual!
I love and admire Ingmar Bergman as well as a vast majority of his films. It Rains on our Love is not one of his very best, it starts off a little formulaic and slow and while there are some very interesting and well-explored themes they were even more fully explored later on. It Rains on our Love is beautifully shot and striking to look at, and Bergman's direction is adept and disciplined as usual. The dialogue provokes thought and the story is moving and compelling. I admired that It Rains on our Love didn't resort too much to melodrama and none of it felt cheap and overly-sentimental. The ending even has some optimism that doesn't feel forced in any way. And then there is the cast who are exemplary. Birger Malmstem and Barbro Kollberg are strong in the lead roles, but the wry performances from Bergman regulars Erland Josephson and Gunnar Bjornstrand were even better.
Overall, while not one of Bergman's very best, it is very good and well done and one of his better early films easily. 8/10 Bethany Cox
Overall, while not one of Bergman's very best, it is very good and well done and one of his better early films easily. 8/10 Bethany Cox
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaTodas las entradas contienen spoilers
- ConexionesFeatured in Rederiet: Nya krafter (1994)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is It Rains on Our Love?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 35 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Llueve sobre nuestro amor (1946) officially released in India in English?
Responda