[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
IMDbPro

El ruiseñor y el cuervo

Título original: The Climax
  • 1944
  • Approved
  • 1h 26min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.4/10
1.1 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
El ruiseñor y el cuervo (1944)
HorrorMusicThriller

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA demented physician becomes obsessed with a young singer whose voice sounds similar to his late mistress.A demented physician becomes obsessed with a young singer whose voice sounds similar to his late mistress.A demented physician becomes obsessed with a young singer whose voice sounds similar to his late mistress.

  • Dirección
    • George Waggner
  • Guionistas
    • Curt Siodmak
    • Lynn Starling
    • Edward Locke
  • Elenco
    • Boris Karloff
    • Susanna Foster
    • Turhan Bey
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    5.4/10
    1.1 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • George Waggner
    • Guionistas
      • Curt Siodmak
      • Lynn Starling
      • Edward Locke
    • Elenco
      • Boris Karloff
      • Susanna Foster
      • Turhan Bey
    • 35Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 27Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Nominado a 1 premio Óscar
      • 2 nominaciones en total

    Fotos65

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    + 59
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal38

    Editar
    Boris Karloff
    Boris Karloff
    • Dr. Friedrich Hohner
    Susanna Foster
    Susanna Foster
    • Angela Klatt
    Turhan Bey
    Turhan Bey
    • Franz Munzer
    Gale Sondergaard
    Gale Sondergaard
    • Luise
    Thomas Gomez
    Thomas Gomez
    • Count Seebruck
    June Vincent
    June Vincent
    • Marcellina
    George Dolenz
    George Dolenz
    • Amato Roselli
    Ludwig Stössel
    Ludwig Stössel
    • Carl Baumann
    Jane Farrar
    Jane Farrar
    • Jarmila Vadek
    Ernö Verebes
    Ernö Verebes
    • Brunn
    • (as Erno Verebes)
    Lotte Stein
    Lotte Stein
    • Mama Hinzl
    Scotty Beckett
    Scotty Beckett
    • The King
    William Edmunds
    • Leon - Theatre Concierge
    Maxwell Hayes
    • Count Romburg - King's Aide
    Dorothy Lawrence
    • Miss Metzger
    Ernie Adams
    Ernie Adams
    • Man in Audience Next to Franz
    • (sin créditos)
    Gertrude Astor
    Gertrude Astor
    • Woman in Audience Behind Franz
    • (sin créditos)
    Polly Bailey
    • Cleaning Woman
    • (sin créditos)
    • Dirección
      • George Waggner
    • Guionistas
      • Curt Siodmak
      • Lynn Starling
      • Edward Locke
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios35

    5.41.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    Michael_Elliott

    Technically Good But Deadly Boring

    The Climax (1944)

    ** (out of 4)

    Boris Karloff returned to Universal Studios playing Dr. Frederich Hohner, a man most people believe is haunted by the disappearance of a female opera singer ten years earlier. What they don't realize is that he actually murdered her. In present times he hears the beautiful Angela Klatt (Susanna Foster) sing and her voice reminds him of the one he killed so he plans to control the new singer.

    THE CLIMAX was Karloff's return to the studio that made him a legend and the company went all out in regards to what the film has to offer. They gave him director George Waggner who had just scored a major success with THE WOLF MAN. They allowed the film to be shot in Technicolor. They even went all out with a higher budget and a classier looking picture. Everything is here except for a story, energy or any passion. I'm always shocked that Universal threw everything at this picture yet they basically delivered a rehash of SVENGALI and PHANTOM OF THE OPERA.

    On a technical level this film is very impressive as the visuals really jump off the screen. The Technicolor is extremely beautiful and especially the dresses and costumes in the picture. Just wait until you see the fire at the end as it looks incredible. The music itself is quite good if you really judge it and I'd argue that the cast is very good as well. This includes Karloff who has no problem playing the passion that this role requires. Foster, Turhan Bey and Gale Sondergaard are all good as well.

    So, what's the problem with THE CLIMAX? It's the story, which is downright boring and the movie ends up moving so slow that it feels twice as long. I really don't know why Universal did this to Karloff and offered such a boring screenplay and especially when they had just done PHANTOM OF THE OPERA the previous year.
    3theowinthrop

    A Curious Failure

    This film was the first one to star Boris Karloff that was in color. As such, it illustrates that to be the first of anything is meaningless if the film lacks coherence, intelligence, and a decent script. The plot begins by taking the viewers into an old theater, where Karloff is shown coming night after night. He has the sympathies of the staff of the theater. It seems that ten years earlier he was engaged to the prima donna singer at the theater, and they were to get married. But on the night before the marriage she vanished, and he - broken hearted (apparently) - has returned every night ever since as though waiting for her.

    Now this could have been the start of an intriguing film. Unfortunately the scriptwriters did not see fit to leave the audience tantalized by Karloff's apparent tragedy. Instead, he falls asleep in his chair and we see his subconscious revealing what happened. The prima donna broke off the wedding in a bitter argument, and Karloff killed her (but as they were alone, he was able to hide the body and cover his tracks). So instead of playing with audience support for Karloff, the script writers show he is up to his typical evil roles.

    The only one who suspects that Karloff is not what he seems is Gale Sondergaard - she remembers what her former mistress was like that night, and there were signs that she was uncertain about the wedding. But she never had anything concrete to work with.

    The theater impresario is Thomas Gomez. One of his musicians/composers (Turhan Bey) is interested in furthering the career of a new singer, Susannah Foster, whom he is dating. Gomez is willing to put her on. But Karloff, who is the theater's doctor, sees Foster (who reminds him of the dead prima donna). Fixed on her, he decides to pursue her (although she is increasingly frightened of him).

    This is the set-up for the plot, and how it eventually leads to the revelation of the fate of the dead woman. It is a tired plot, mostly because there is little chemistry between Foster and Karloff (although that is not a fatal flaw - he is fixed on her, she need not show any type of fascination towards him). Sondergaard is wasted (occasionally, as the film progresses, she reveals her suspicions). Gomez, normally a considerably good villain himself, plays his jovial side as the impresario. As for Turhan Bey, he shows great interest in Foster - and she is shown singing in one of his new operettas (the music of which is a steal from Schubert's Marche Militaire).

    The end result is that the viewer is not deeply interested (after awhile) in the fates of these characters. Even when Karloff (at one point) knocks out Ludwig Stossel, our lack of interest in the "little old wine maker" actor prevents us getting too concerned (Ludwig recovers by the way). Given that the film was supplied with a grade A film gloss (by using color stock) it is ironic that the whole effect is basically thrown away. It does not help matters, to the fans of Boris Karloff, that one year after this color-film flop, he gave one of his greatest performances in Val Lewton's THE BODY SNATCHER as Grey the Coachman - in a black and white film with a meaty script. Instead of Technicolor, the production people should have concentrated on good writing and plotting. I will give it a "3" only because it is visually good, but otherwise it was a waste of time and money.
    6Bunuel1976

    THE CLIMAX (George Waggner, 1944) **1/2

    This much-maligned Boris Karloff vehicle is actually not too bad; then again, the 1943 version of PHANTOM OF THE OPERA - for which this was a follow-up, conveniently filmed on the same expensive sets - isn't very popular with horror fans either.

    Many have stated that Karloff sleepwalks through his role here: true, it doesn't really extend his range but, given that he was headlining a super-production and being the consummate professional that he was, I hardly believe he could afford to be indifferent about it (and, in any case, it returned him to territory he had already covered in CHARLIE CHAN AT THE OPERA [1936])! It's fairly enjoyable in itself, if not a little silly (Karloff demanding that his sweetheart stop her glorious singing career merely because he's jealous of all the admiration she's getting, his hypnotic control over the Susanna Foster character being exercised by means of a flask of atomizer {throat spray}!), and the lavishly colorful production is certainly attractive. The musical numbers are more 'modern' than those in PHANTOM, though there are still too many of them (remaining, in any case, a matter of taste!).

    Foster does okay by her role but I agree that Turhan Bey is totally miscast and almost sinks the film; however, the supporting cast is pretty good - above all Gale Sondergaard (in a surprisingly sympathetic role), Thomas Gomez and Ludwig Stossel.The film's best sequences would have to be the murder of Karloff's wife, the hypnotism sessions (highlighting Karloff's glaring eyes in close-up) and the fiery climax {sic} (as in THE BLACK CAT [1934], Karloff keeps the body of his dead wife embalmed in a secret room) - in essence, all the horrific elements there are.

    P.S. According to the "Classic Horror Film Board", as was the case with Universal's initial DVD release of Dracula (1931), this film is missing the underscoring during the opening sequence (not having watched THE CLIMAX previously, I couldn't have known about this) - how the hell does something like this happen...?!
    SkippyDevereaux

    Technicolor can't do everything for a film!!

    From the opening music to the final scene, this has got to be one of the most beautiful horror films ever made. Unfortunately, as I said before, technicolor can't do everything for a film. While it is visually stunning in every way, it lacks a credible storyline, and that is what drags the film down. I guess one shouldn't call it a horror film, rather it might a psychological type film, as there is only one murder( and a rather mild one at that). I thought that the opera singing was a bit too much, but what did I expect when the film is about an opera singer!! But I found it to be just like "The Shadow", they are beautiful to look at, but there isn't anything else for the film to succeed.
    5utgard14

    There's the Opera But Where's the Phantom?

    The sets are gorgeous, the cast is good, Karloff is always fun to watch. Unfortunately someone forgot this is supposed to be a thriller and decided what audiences really loved was opera. So much of this movie is devoted to operatic musical numbers. I was having to mute the tv often. That stuff just gives me a headache. It's still worth a look for Karloff, the lovely Technicolor, and the impressive sets. Just be aware that it's not a horror film even by the standards of 1944, and it's got way too much focus on opera.

    Más como esto

    El castillo negro
    6.3
    El castillo negro
    Night Key
    6.3
    Night Key
    El castillo del ogro
    6.2
    El castillo del ogro
    Adua y sus amigas
    7.6
    Adua y sus amigas
    El monstruo diabólico
    6.1
    El monstruo diabólico
    Extraña revelación
    6.5
    Extraña revelación
    Monstruo nocturno
    6.1
    Monstruo nocturno
    Extraño accidente
    6.8
    Extraño accidente
    Amores a los quince
    6.5
    Amores a los quince
    La torre de Londres
    6.6
    La torre de Londres
    Más allá de la tumba
    6.1
    Más allá de la tumba
    Maldición legendaria
    6.7
    Maldición legendaria

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      This film was shot on the lavish sets created for El fantasma de la ópera (1943) in an attempt to recoup the large budget of that film. The opera house set had been built for the original El fantasma de la ópera (1925) starring Lon Chaney, and this extraordinary set still exists on the Universal Studios lot. It is the oldest surviving movie set in the world.
    • Errores
      In the rehearsal sequence in which Angela loses her voice at the sight of Dr. Hohner, she closes her mouth a split second before the playback of her voice stops.
    • Citas

      Dr. Hohner: You don't want to ruin that voice, do you? It isn't yours, remember? Now tell me, whose voice is it?... Tell me!

      Angela: Marcellina's!

    • Conexiones
      Featured in Movie 4 Tonight: The Climax (1970)
    • Bandas sonoras
      Three Marches Militaires
      (opus 51)

      Composed by Franz Schubert

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas Frecuentes

    • How long is The Climax?
      Con tecnología de Alexa

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 14 de marzo de 1945 (México)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • The Climax
    • Locaciones de filmación
      • Universal Studios - 100 Universal City Plaza, Universal City, California, Estados Unidos(Studio)
    • Productora
      • Universal Pictures
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      1 hora 26 minutos
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    El ruiseñor y el cuervo (1944)
    Principales brechas de datos
    By what name was El ruiseñor y el cuervo (1944) officially released in India in English?
    Responda
    • Ver más datos faltantes
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.