Headline

I found this pretty enjoyable from beginning to end, fairly lighthearted in its journalism aspects, and solid enough dramatically in its more serious moments. However, I have an important question that no other reviewer seems to have thought about (and no spoilers here, as the viewing audience knows everything right from the beginning) and it is this: Why in heaven's name does the villain Paul Grayson shoot the victim? She had a pistol, he easily disarmed her in the presence of another female visitor, and then, when she had fallen to the floor and is a threat to no one, he stands over her, still in the presence of his visitor, and shoots her twice in the stomach. Why? We never hear a word out of him in explanation or justification, the action will ruin his life, he has a witness to his crime, and up to that point he appears a charming and friendly fellow. Later, from the police, we find that the woman he shot was pregnant and had expected marriage, but that hardly seems reason enough to shoot her in front of a witness he has no plans to also kill. Come to think of it, other than being a friend of the witness, we learn just about nothing of his past or his character for the rest of the film. It is the only narrative problem for me in the movie and could probably have been completely covered in about one minute of explanation, but it never is. Still, it's a very enjoyable film with lots of good performances, not the least of which is that given by William Hartnell.

A girl is murdered in the flat of her playboy lover. A "mystery woman" is also present. The newspaper editor wants to know the identity of the woman. Enter daring crime reporter Farrar. The viewer is though one step ahead of the cast – we know the identity of the mystery woman and the consequences should her identity be revealed.

The film drags for the most part as rival news organisations try to beat the police to the mystery woman and the murderer (who has gone into hiding). Things hot up in the last 20 minutes. The conclusion is a little unexpected so don't pull out early.

Farrar manages not to be too objectionable in his "clever clogs" role – always one step ahead of the pack (fellow crime reporter Hartnell and the police) but not too smug. While the storyline is ordinary, the direction and acting make this easy to watch. Don't cancel a night out to watch this but it is worth a look if it hits the schedules.

Newspaper boss John Stuart (Ellington) looks like an old school friend of mine who had a peculiar face. He wants his reporter David Farrar (Brookie) to get a news headline for once. He's a nasty character, really. There's been a murder and a mystery woman was seen at the scene. Farrar's brief is to get hold of the mystery woman. So, we follow Farrar's investigation alongside newspaper rival William Hartnell (Dell) as they try and get the scoop on the story.

We know who the murderer is and who the mystery woman is from the beginning. This makes the film interesting as we are kept in suspense as to how she will be revealed. You know she will, it's just a matter of time………. Or will she? I'm pleased to say that the film has an unexpected ending with a bit of tension along the way on a train journey. But check out those fake punches…….oh dear…! Farrar is good in the lead and we get a good scene when he and the mystery lady come face to face and both realize what is happening.

So, never believe what you read in newspapers as it is never quite the whole truth.

I like crime films and David Farrar,so this film came as rather a disappointment.The climax is really phoney.There is a very reasonable cast to support him but they cannot save the film from mediocrity.I was more interested in the reasonably authentic representation of the Waterloo news cinema with which I was very familiar.Before 3pm there was a one hour news programme and after old British films.It was operated by the classic circuit.

Reporter David Farrar catches a story about a murder. The trail leads to his editor's wife's involvement.

It starts off as one of those cheeky reporter yarns, with a budding relationship with staff member Ann Crawford, stealing photographs in competition with rival William Hartnell, and an odd little independent investigator played weirdly by Richard Goolden. Amidst the slovenly background -- suggesting but not not actually showing film noir -- it gradually darkens in tone and look. Although it starts slowly, full of cliches, it gradually becomes more involving. With John Stuart, Antoinette Cellier, Anthony Hawtrey, and a nice small part for Elsie Wagstaff.