La hiena

I loved this film, and it had me howling in several parts, such as the classically predictable ending. Such a great morality tale. I especially liked the portrayal of the developing and mature relationship between Olivia de Havilland and George Brent. This is the best Brent role in a Davis movie. I appreciate Davis not playing a more subtle character, such as in Mr. Skeffington, because the Stanley character is so boorish that she can't consider anything but her own whims and pleasures. She is not evil in the sense of making reasoned choices, but as a child, has no capacity for self denial. Delusionally, she actually thinks that Brent can be lured back under her spell after what she has done to him, and that a wealthy white woman's claim will alway be considered above a young black man's. Her world starts to crumble after she reels off the list of those who accepted her story over Parry's, when her sister, de Havilland says "I believe him." This is an emblematic tale of deliverance and hopeful new beginning. Bravo to all involved.

I remember, in my former life, a long, long time ago, when a college professor told me that something that is created by another human being that gets your attention and stirs something inside you, and gets your visual attention, and captivates you, maybe is art.

Well, this motion picture got my attention. Yes, it captivated me. The story, the actors and the moral was superb. Many times when I see these movies of an older era, I try to imagine in my mind, what the adult audience was thinking then, as they saw the story, the emotion, the characters. All the actors did a excellent job. Bettie Davis did it to me again. Her character made me hate her, and feel pity for her at the same time.

I still don't understand why I still have a crush on her. Maybe it's that old false thinking that the right man, could change her, me! Through the years, the more I see her, the more I love her.

All too often, many reviewers pick a motion picture or the actors apart on some of the most insignificant and minuet details. The director should have done this or it wasn't true to the book, or she or he could have acted a little better, blah, blah, blah. Even I have done that-- more than once. But, if things are done "reasonably" well and it holds your attention... Well, that's entertainment. That is what you pay the ticket at the box office window for. If I had paid for a ticket at the old box office for this movie, I could say that I got more than my monies worth in entertainment. And, I am still thinking about it after the movie is over.

For the only time in his career, director John Huston does a film with the main protagonists being women, in this case two of Warner Brothers biggest stars. Bette Davis and Olivia DeHavilland play a couple of sisters named Timberlake, one good and one bad. I'll leave it to the veteran movie fans to tell who was who.

Although quite frankly both these women could have pulled off each other's roles in In This Our Life. They certainly proved over the course of their careers that they had the acting chops. The property seemed a natural for them as they play women of southern origin.

Olivia's good sister is not quite as Pollyannish as her Melanie Hamilton from Gone With The Wind. But almost to the very end she allows Bette and her whims and desires to run roughshod over her life.

The film does revolve around Bette and her character is an exponential version of Julie Marsden from Jezebel. She's a selfish willful flirt who thinks absolutely of nothing except herself and causes havoc to all around here.

As the story opens Bette is keeping company with lawyer George Brent and Olivia is getting married to young doctor Dennis Morgan. On an impulsive whim and maybe to prove she can do it, Bette takes Morgan away from Olivia and they run off and get married. But Bette doesn't want the honeymoon to end and poor Morgan can't keep up with her partying. Realizing what he did he kills himself.

But that's far from the end of things. Davis who loves to speed her car, causes a hit and run accident that kills a young girl and badly injures her mother. She casts blame on a young black kid Ernest Anderson who is working and clerking in George Brent's office and is the son of Timberlake maid Hattie McDaniel.

The story is set in Virginia, not the deep South, but deep enough so that despite Anderson's denials, the law will just take white woman Davis's word as a matter of course. If it were Alabama, probably Anderson would have been lynched given those times. She knows this and for a while exploits the racism in her society.

Ernest Anderson's role was an incredible milestone for its times, showing a black young man who aspired to a professional life. In This Our Life is quite the indictment of Southern society of the time.

Another role that got acclaim for a different reason was Charles Coburn as the uncle whose 'affection' for Davis can't be mistaken for anything else, but incestuous desire. He's the main employer in the town and pretty much makes the law around there. Davis's last scene with Coburn is one of the best in the film and reveals everything about both of these disreputable people.

John Huston even got his father Walter to play an unbilled small bit as a bartender. The bartender it turns out is the key to getting at the truth for the police authorities.

In This Our Life is one of Bette Davis's meatiest roles. Huston is a good enough director though to not let her pyrotechnics blot out the rest of the cast. For fans of Bette this one is a must.

The family patriarch (Frank Craven), who has long since lost control of the business he himself started, and winds up only being an employee at, raises two distinctly different daughters. One (played by Bette Davis) is corrupted by her own personality defects and the attentions of her uncle (Charles Coburn), who has plenty of ability in business (it is revealed that he swooped in and took over the business that Craven started at an opportune time), but has a childless and cold marriage and presumably for that reason, showers money, gifts, and attention on his niece, foolishly believing he can buy her love and his happiness. This turns out to be probably Stanley's (Bette Davis) most formative relationship. Why De Havilland's Roy is so different we can only assume was because she came more under the influence of her father (Craven). That involved background story is actually more interesting than the story that is presented in the foreground, of Davis and sister Olivia De Havilland and their relationships with George Brent and Dennis Morgan. Nonetheless, Davis' relationship with Uncle William (Coburn) reaches a climactic point that ties in beautifully with the climax of the film.

Fortunately, I stumbled upon this film airing early one morning on TCM. Bette Davis is quite wonderful, and contrary to what some posters have stated, she actually underplays what could have been an hilarious, scenery-chewing role. DeHavilland is, likewise, outstanding as the initially timid individual, who must cope with the devastating actions of her selfish sister.

Supporting performances are directed well by Houston, with young Ernest Anderson standing out as the wrongly accused black man. It is disappointing that the remainder of his career consisted mainly of parts such as waiters, doormen, porters, etc.

Max Steiner's score is a bit overpowering at times, but he was at the top of his game in the early 40s. The Warner back lot works effectively as Virginia, and the absence of fake/forced Southern accents actually lends credibility to the performances.

As others have stated, I will now seek out the original source material, especially after having learned of its honors. I am curious as to the source of a previous claim that the film was a critical and financial bomb on release.