Under Cover of Night

I agree with previous reviewer "Western" it put me off the film killing the cute little dog. I hate any film whether an old film like this or a modern film. I quite like Edmund Lowe films, this wasn't a bad story and would have given more stars.

Under Cover of Night (1937)

** (out of 4)

A physics professor is stepping down from the main position of his university so a group of teachers are anxiously awaiting who he will name as a successor. One of the men, Prof. Griswald (Henry Daniell) kills his wife after she threatens to reveal that every "he" knows is actually her work. From this point on he must try and locate a book that proves he doesn't know what he claims and he will kill anyone he has to. A sleuth (Edmund Lowe) begins to investigate with the help of a woman (Florence Rice) and a dimwitted cop (Nat Pendleton). This MGM production features an attractive cast but sadly the story itself just isn't interesting enough to keep you entertained throughout the rather short 70-minute running time. I think the biggest problem is that the screenplay just doesn't offer us anything we haven't seen before and seen countless times already. There are countless scenes where our killer takes a huge chance and with very little to gain. Take for example the scene where he murders his wife who simply has a bad heart. In a rather unintentionally funny sequence, he throws her beloved dog out the window, killing it and the wife then drops dead of a heart attack. The entire murder sequence doesn't really work because it depends on the husband knowing that this would kill the wife and if it hadn't then he really would have been in trouble. Even other murder pieces are pushed onto other suspects but the way this is done just doesn't work and isn't a bit believable. The cast does what they can with Lowe once again giving a decent, laid-back performance where he walks and talks with a cool breeze. Daniell was always good at playing this stiff, dark characters and he does a fine job as well. Pendleton's comic relief isn't really funny but this is due to the rather lame jokes and not his performance. Sara Haden, best known for her role as the Aunt in the Andy Hardy series, steals the show as the wife in her few scenes. Dean Jagger and Harry Davenport appear as well.

Henry Daniell whom I long ago dubbed "the Voice with the built in sneer" steals this film as a professor who commits a series of murders including that of his own wife Sara Haden to gain a promotion in the faculty of his college. He's a total fraud, cheating on his own wife and committing murder in a sick, but admittedly clever way.

Edmund Lowe is a private detective who brings him down and dimwitted police detective Nat Pendleton is there to lend a legal imprimatur to Lowe's activities.

Daniell is truly nuts if he doesn't think eventually they would get to him. As all these crimes are committed within the space of a couple days. A fatal flaw in the story of Under Cover Of Night.

Still Henry Daniell has a legion of fans including me. If you're a Henry Daniell fan this film is a must.

Typical throw-away 'Who Dun it' made by all the Studios to full-fill their obligations too their theater chain commitments. The difference with this film is we all know 'Who Dun it' from the get-go.

UNDER COVER OF NIGHT (1937) M.G.M. (70") is a tightly scripted and filmed 'B' programmer. It features second line Stars under contract, plus a supporting cast from their stock company. Edmund Lowe formally was a mainline Star at FOX during the 20s' through the early 30s', now a suave character actor. A second rate William Powell. Sara Haden, best known as 'Aunt Milly' in the ANDY HARDY series is the first victim. Her husband is Henry Daniell, which telegraphs from the opening credits who the murderer is. The rest of cast is readably identifiable. Johnny Arthur, Harry Davenport, Dean Jagger, Nat Pendleton, Dorothy Peterson and Frank Reicher. If you do not recognize any of them, you do not know movies.

The plot-line is hardly credible, but the professionalism of the cast and its quick pace makes it enjoyable. True, there is not ANY suspense in this mystery. It is all there in the first 10". That does not make it a less enjoyable watch. Sometimes it is just fun to view a group of competent actors just go through their paces without skipping a beat. Not cheating themselves or their employers while picking up their paychecks!

... is all I can say about the villain in this one. On graduation day at a small college the head of the physics department announces he will soon step down and announce his successor shortly. Professor Marvin Griswald (Henry Daniell) has been letting his wife do the research work and he's been taking the credit with her full knowledge of course. She's on the threshold of a discovery that will shake the foundation of physics, and with Marvin taking the credit he's sure to get the department headship, or so he thinks - he's chomping at the bit for this promotion. Unfortunately for Marvin, he's let his loins get the best of him and has been flaunting his infidelity with a pretty young student in his wife's face. She decides to retaliate by summarizing her notes into one small book, destroying the original notes, and refusing to let Marvin have the summary book. Plus she's leaving him, which seems to be the least of the bad news as far Marvin is concerned.

That night, as a party goes on downstairs, Marvin enters his wife's room and does something just awful that shocks her and causes her to have a heart attack and die. Marvin has committed the perfect murder - her weak heart is a well known fact - but unfortunately his wife's notes are no longer in her purse as they were just an hour before. Wherever could they have gone? Now Marvin is in the clear up to now, but based on merely guessing as to which of the guests could have his wife's notes he invades home after home and commits several more homicides trying to find the notes - and these murders definitely do not look like heart attacks.

Fortunately, ace detective Chris Cross (Edmund Lowe) is on the scene and was at the party, since he is an old friend and ex-student of the retiring department head. Like Nick Charles, he prevents the police from arresting the wrong man, and the cast even includes Nat Pendleton playing the same type of easily flustered flat foot that he played in The Thin Man.

Unlike The Thin Man, you'll figure out who has the dead woman's notes from the start and you definitely know who the killer is. Also unlike The Thin Man there is a prolonged rather odd scene set in a sauna in which Chris Cross, Nat Pendleton's character, and the escaped falsely accused suspect sit around relaxing and steam cleaning their pores trying to figure this whole mess out.

Then there's the matter of Marvin's young mistress. She didn't start Marvin on his homicidal rampage or even assist him, but she's an accessory since he's told her everything and she didn't call the police. Like Anne Boleyn, she's got to realize that if her lover will kill to keep her and consolidate power he'll do the same to her if he ever wants to rid himself of her, especially now that she knows so much.

Like I said at the beginning, so much education, so little common sense. Highly recommended if you want to see a crime drama that is definitely off the beaten path yet is well done.