Agrega una trama en tu idiomaTwo men stumble into an old mansion, and get involved with a crazed scientist, torture chambers and sinister medical experiments.Two men stumble into an old mansion, and get involved with a crazed scientist, torture chambers and sinister medical experiments.Two men stumble into an old mansion, and get involved with a crazed scientist, torture chambers and sinister medical experiments.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Rita Carlyle
- Mrs. Shippam
- (sin créditos)
Ramsay Hill
- Police Inspector
- (sin créditos)
Olaf Hytten
- Wilson
- (sin créditos)
Richard Lancaster
- English Constable
- (sin créditos)
Edgar Norton
- Mr. Henry Shippam
- (sin créditos)
Tom Ricketts
- Peters
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Although not perfect, this is a film that cheats its audience in order to have a proper running time, this is still a good film. The basic plot has a man from America going to England because he has inherited a house. Amazingly when he gets there, he finds that there are people there already who threaten him and run him off. With the help of a friend who is a well known detective he tries to get to the bottom of it all and falls in love in the process.
This is a very good old dark house story, or would be if the film were really set in the house. Much of the movie is involved in getting into the house and in wooing the girl.
As I mentioned earlier this is also a movie that can be frustrating since several times characters are about to talk about whats going on when the movie fades to black or cuts to the next scene. Its annoying, for some fatally so, for me I just shrugged and went with it. There is no reason for the fades , other than to annoy the audience since in all but one instance and earlier fade out would have been less maddening.
Should you run across this on late night TV give it a shot. Its a nice way to spend an hour.
This is a very good old dark house story, or would be if the film were really set in the house. Much of the movie is involved in getting into the house and in wooing the girl.
As I mentioned earlier this is also a movie that can be frustrating since several times characters are about to talk about whats going on when the movie fades to black or cuts to the next scene. Its annoying, for some fatally so, for me I just shrugged and went with it. There is no reason for the fades , other than to annoy the audience since in all but one instance and earlier fade out would have been less maddening.
Should you run across this on late night TV give it a shot. Its a nice way to spend an hour.
The House of Secrets starts with an intriguing shipboard encounter: Leslie Fenton (as Barry) assists Muriel Evans (Julie) escape the unwanted attentions of a stranger. She thanks him nicely—but when he attempts to take a look in her handbag for whatever it was the stranger was after, she—get this—throws the whole bag overboard rather than let him see its contents! Hmm, mysterious.
Not surprisingly, they soon meet again (in a major but not shocking coincidence, she happens to be living at the large estate he has just inherited), and she becomes one of numerous characters determinedly resisting Barry's attempts not only to enter his own property, but to find out what the heck is going on. These characters include practically everyone else in the story—his detective friend, Julie's scientist father, some police and government officials, and a gang of crooks after a hidden treasure.
The plot is fast-moving and fairly intricate, and the dialog is mostly sharp. However, as the story progresses, frustration builds—not only for Barry but for us viewers, who also have no idea why everyone is trying so hard to keep him in the dark. By late in the film, my own sympathies had shifted almost entirely over to the gang of crooks, because at least they were straightforward about what they wanted, which is something you can't say about any of the other characters.
The movie also features an ancient document written in "old English," which means it has some words like "ye" and "olde" in it, that is fun for the gangsters to try and sound out. And an inn landlady offers some entertaining colloquial dialog, like her criticism of her husband's aches and pains: "He calls it rheumatism, but I calls it arthritis. I likes to keep up to date." Nothing is particularly authentic, but hey, I point that out in fun, not as a real quibble with the film. Overall, the dialog is one of this film's quite interesting qualities.
Overall: well done—but maddening.
Not surprisingly, they soon meet again (in a major but not shocking coincidence, she happens to be living at the large estate he has just inherited), and she becomes one of numerous characters determinedly resisting Barry's attempts not only to enter his own property, but to find out what the heck is going on. These characters include practically everyone else in the story—his detective friend, Julie's scientist father, some police and government officials, and a gang of crooks after a hidden treasure.
The plot is fast-moving and fairly intricate, and the dialog is mostly sharp. However, as the story progresses, frustration builds—not only for Barry but for us viewers, who also have no idea why everyone is trying so hard to keep him in the dark. By late in the film, my own sympathies had shifted almost entirely over to the gang of crooks, because at least they were straightforward about what they wanted, which is something you can't say about any of the other characters.
The movie also features an ancient document written in "old English," which means it has some words like "ye" and "olde" in it, that is fun for the gangsters to try and sound out. And an inn landlady offers some entertaining colloquial dialog, like her criticism of her husband's aches and pains: "He calls it rheumatism, but I calls it arthritis. I likes to keep up to date." Nothing is particularly authentic, but hey, I point that out in fun, not as a real quibble with the film. Overall, the dialog is one of this film's quite interesting qualities.
Overall: well done—but maddening.
The wise-cracking Leslie Fenton (as "Barry") sounds quite a bit like James Cagney in his gangster days. The lovely Muriel Evans (as "Julie") looks quite a bit like Jean Harlow. The movie is not a true "Old Dark House" movie, because it doesn't have some of the elements required to qualify, but there is an old dark house, a hidden treasure, & lots of mystery. "House of Secrets" is interesting, the dialog is snappy with lots of current day (copyright 1936) slang, the acting is good, the sets are dark & spooky, & there are a few neat sub-plots (one involving Chicago mobsters). What drags this movie down a bit is the redundancy. I couldn't count the number of times Barry asks "What's going on?" & Julie (among many others) replies "I can't tell you." Although I was eventually able to guess the ending, it was difficult to figure out, & fun meanwhile. I rate it 6/10.
I like the Chesterfield stable of 1930s mysteries which is where this one hails from. This film is a modest affair but it does have an out and out mystery thing going for it.
An American man finds he has inherited a property in England but he is barred from entering it from the outset. He's unable to trust anyone as he is sold all sorts of information about this old country house. He doesn't know if the Hawk's Nest manor is already occupied by a bunch of crooks or a bunch of cranks. There are all kinds of mystery ingredients to the story which include a 300 year old manuscript and scientific experiments and a couple of big mysterious cellars.
There are no characters that immediately spring out. My favorite is the friend of the American inheritor. A fellow American man called Tom who is solidly played by Sidney Blackmer. He got to play the lead in a later mystery called 'The Panther's Claw' (1942) which I recommend to genre fans.
Some of the dialog is fairly good. I like the posters for this film especially the green ghoulish one that has the Hawk's Nest in the background. As expected the critical rating by the film general viewer is never going to be that great for this one. But I think the typical 1930s B-mystery fan will find it irresistible.
An American man finds he has inherited a property in England but he is barred from entering it from the outset. He's unable to trust anyone as he is sold all sorts of information about this old country house. He doesn't know if the Hawk's Nest manor is already occupied by a bunch of crooks or a bunch of cranks. There are all kinds of mystery ingredients to the story which include a 300 year old manuscript and scientific experiments and a couple of big mysterious cellars.
There are no characters that immediately spring out. My favorite is the friend of the American inheritor. A fellow American man called Tom who is solidly played by Sidney Blackmer. He got to play the lead in a later mystery called 'The Panther's Claw' (1942) which I recommend to genre fans.
Some of the dialog is fairly good. I like the posters for this film especially the green ghoulish one that has the Hawk's Nest in the background. As expected the critical rating by the film general viewer is never going to be that great for this one. But I think the typical 1930s B-mystery fan will find it irresistible.
Based on one of the stories by Sydney Horler, this one takes a while to get going. Twelve minutes in, and we finally figure out what's going on.... there's something shady going on at this estate, and the rightful owner is run off "his own property", according to him, Barry Wilding (Leslie Fenton). He bumps into Julie (Muriel Evans), who warns Barry against confronting the squatters at the estate. All so mysterious. The only name I recognize in here is Sidney Blackmer, who had appeared in so many films. so just WHAT is going on at that estate? the rightful owner is SO patient.... letting people live there, and do whatever the heck they are doing! meh. skip this one. who cares. showing on moonlight movies channel. yawn....
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe earliest documented telecast of this film took place in New York City 11/13/48 on WATV (Channel 13). It first aired in Cincinnati 11/10/49 on WKRC (Channel 11).
- Citas
Dan Wharton: That dick can see with his ears and with the back of his head.
- ConexionesRemake of The House of Secrets (1929)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The House of Secrets?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- House of Secrets
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 10 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was The House of Secrets (1936) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda