Estrella de medianoche

The plot was a bit loose and incredulous, but no movie with William Powell and Ginger Rogers can be bad. It slightly resembles the much better film, The Thin Man (1934), but it was fun nevertheless. Powell and Rogers have good chemistry together and provide some of the comedy with their antics, with other comedy supplied by inept police officer, Robert Emmett O'Connor. I guessed who the murderer was early, but couldn't provide the motive until it was explained.

By the sheer brilliance of his charismatic on screen presence, William Powell raises this picture out of the commonplace to something special. His grace and bearing made him the picture of dapper sophistication, and no one, save for Fred Astaire, looked better in white tie and tails than William Powell.

Here he co-stars with Ginger Rogers, and speaking for myself, I did not miss Myrna Loy. Ginger Rogers was more attractive and energetic, and was a breath of fresh air. And he was not playing Nick Charles or Philo Vance. Your regard for Ms. Loy may be the key to your appreciation of "Star Of Midnight".

It sounds like a rare jewel, but the Star of Midnight of the title is about the star of a Broadway show called "Midnight". She is missing, and in fact, never appears in the movie, despite a screen credit. The mystery is to find out who kidnapped her and who killed some of the guys looking for her. The plot is confusing, but if you are a William Powell fan, it won't matter; go with it.

William Powell and Ginger Rogers are a neat screen team in "Star of Midnight," a 1935 comedy-drama that concerns the disappearance of a woman named "Alice." Alice's hapless boyfriend spots her starring in a show under another name and wearing a mask. He stands up in the audience and screams "Alice" - and by the time he gets backstage, Alice has left the building. Shortly after this, a newspaper columnist is murdered in Powell's apartment. That's just the beginning. When Alice fades from view, it signals a web that connects a couple of crimes and an old girlfriend of Powell's.

Powell plays a lawyer who often doubles as a detective, and Rogers is a young woman who decided as a child that she was going to marry him. They make a good-looking and fun couple. Both handle the dialogue beautifully and play off each other well. It always amazes me how quickly people spoke in the early films. It really gives witty dialogue a nice crackle. This is also a good film to see to get a grasp on the '30s styles of design and fashions. Lots of time is spent in Powell's impressive apartment, and the slim Rogers shows off a beautiful wardrobe. There is also some footage of New York in the '30s which is marvelous.

"Star of Midnight" has a somewhat colorless supporting cast, the exception being Paul Kelly, with most of the focus being on Powell and Rogers. This is a familiar role for Powell, but I could watch him forever. He was a true master of this genre. A very enjoyable movie -I wish Powell and Rogers had been paired together more.

'Star of Midnight' did have a few things going for it. When reading the plot synopsis, being a fan of this type of story and the genre, it really intrigued me. William Powell always impressed me as an actor and bad performances were rare, here in a role that suited him to the ground. Also like Ginger Rogers, if more as a dancer than as an actress (though she doesn't fare too shabbily at all in this regard, when it comes to dancing on film she's a legend), especially when partnered with Fred Astaire.

Although it is not the best that either Powell and Rogers, the latter in a very Myrna Loy sort of role, ever did (both did many great films and performances in other things before and since), 'Star of Midnight' is hardly a waste of their talents. It was far from a perfect film and a couple of components were executed very unevenly, but it was a fun and intriguing one that serves its purpose to entertain and perhaps in a way challenge very well.

Lets start with 'Star of Midnight's' good things. It looks very slick and stylish. Count me in as another person who is so envious of that bathroom. The type of script here is my personal favourite type, the sophisticated and witty kind, sorry for throwing around those words a lot recently but it is hard not to when so many films at that time had those qualities in their writing and did them well and even superbly. Much of the dialogue really crackles.

The story is mostly tight, engaging with a generally solid and atmospherically suspenseful mystery that didn't get too convoluted. Coherence was not a problem for me here. The direction was well judged. Powell is wonderfully debonair and witty, traits that suited him perfectly and at that time he was one of the best on film in doing that. Rogers fares very admirably in the Myrna Loy-type role and the chemistry between the two is difficult to resist. The supporting cast are very uneven, but Gene Lockhart, J Farroll MacDonald and particularly Paul Kelly are good.

Others didn't make the grade however. The worst offenders agreed are Leslie Fenton, who fails to inject much personality into a colourless part, and Robert Emmett O'Connor who is irritating beyond belief and overdoes the character's dumbness.

Did feel that the identity of the killer was too obvious too early, again a problem for others. Also that the ending was rather far-fetched.

In a nutshell, fun but didn't blow me away. 7/10

So, how does Ginger Rogers stand up against Myrna Loy? Rogers has the comedy chops. She's shown that in movies like The Major and the Minor. She trades quips with Powell much like Loy. She snoops like Loy. She drinks like Loy. But, she isn't Myrna Loy...

If the Thin Man series had never been, I would've enjoyed Rogers' performance more. It was a fun movie: An incomprehensible mystery where the murderer seems like a name drawn out of a hat at the last minute. The judge from Miracle on 34th Street plays Swain the Butler. The man who played Inspector Henderson in Night at the Opera plays a cop in this movie as well.

There is a nice chemistry between Rogers and Powell, but it just doesn't rise to the chemistry between Powell and Loy. Powell's detective character needs the stern eye of a sophisticated woman like Mrs. Charles to keep him humble. Makes for better comedy...

All in all, though...a good movie...