Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA young London woman meets an impoverished Russian prince. She brings him home to live with her middle-class family. The prince has diamonds from the last czar to sell. The money and his roy... Leer todoA young London woman meets an impoverished Russian prince. She brings him home to live with her middle-class family. The prince has diamonds from the last czar to sell. The money and his royal fame transform the family's lives.A young London woman meets an impoverished Russian prince. She brings him home to live with her middle-class family. The prince has diamonds from the last czar to sell. The money and his royal fame transform the family's lives.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Cicely Oates
- Flossie Williams
- (as Cecily Oates)
Molly Fisher
- May Sawley
- (as Mollie Fisher)
Margaret Yarde
- Bit
- (sin créditos)
Opiniones destacadas
At first glance when this came on TV I thought 'Ivor Novello, meh, probably some cheesy songs and dated, creaky humour'. But how wrong I was. The fast-paced dialogue and frenetic plotting are imbued with a casual but knowing wit that gives the piece an amazingly modern feel for a film made in 1933. Novello himself is the big surprise, there's real panache in the way he drives it all along from within his character's louche, offhand manner. The rest of the cast are well up for it, conveying the chaos caused by Novello's superficial and fickle (though fatally charismatic) character - an exotic stranger who quietly invades the suburban family home in which he becomes a temporary guest, heedless of the trail of disruption he leaves in his wake.
I for Novello was principally a stage actor and he only made a handful of film appearances in the sound era.In fact it has to be said watching this film that he looks every bit the stage star.Every time he appears on screen the focus is really on him.He plays a Russian Prince who has found his way to London with a cache of priceless jewels.He is discovered at the maze at Hampton Court by Ursula Jeans who decides to take him home to her parents home where he is invited to stay.This disrupts everyone including young her boyfriend,an impossibly young Jack Hawkinns and her younger sister,Ida Lupino.He is used by the film as a sort of device to solve all of the characters problems,not the least being that of Elliott Markeham who has becomec romanticallybinvolved with his secretary,who is determined to take him for all that he has.
Ursula Jeans meets a very elegant, very Russian Ivor Novello. He's broke, so she takes him home to her family's middle-class house, until he gets back on his feet. That will be a problem, because he's a Russian prince, and so not fitted for anything. All he has is a few sets of jewels worth thousands of quids. Since they were gift from the late Tsar, he can't spend them on himself. He can spend them on his new family, whose settled, decent lives he turns topsy-turvy.
It's based on Novello's stage hit, and director Maurice Elvey does a fine job of opening it up, with a camera that moves, quick cuts, and close-ups. there are some wonderfully silly scenes, like the one where Novello gets the local snobs drunk on vodka-laced tea. Yet the serious segments are curiously at odds with the crazy-comic ones; they are two sets of stage conventions that do not mix well.
It's a bit odd to see this out of Twickenham. That production company had been built on a series of quota quickies, subsidized by American companies who needed British production to play alongside their imported movies to comply with British law. the larger British integrated studios found the small studio useful for providing cheap second features to run in their big houses. the problem was that owner Julius Hagen had grown weary of the thin profit margins, and aware of the immense profits from A productions. So he cut back on the bread-and-butter productions and tried for prestige... and found himself shut out by the big, integrated companies, in Britain and the U.S.
It's based on Novello's stage hit, and director Maurice Elvey does a fine job of opening it up, with a camera that moves, quick cuts, and close-ups. there are some wonderfully silly scenes, like the one where Novello gets the local snobs drunk on vodka-laced tea. Yet the serious segments are curiously at odds with the crazy-comic ones; they are two sets of stage conventions that do not mix well.
It's a bit odd to see this out of Twickenham. That production company had been built on a series of quota quickies, subsidized by American companies who needed British production to play alongside their imported movies to comply with British law. the larger British integrated studios found the small studio useful for providing cheap second features to run in their big houses. the problem was that owner Julius Hagen had grown weary of the thin profit margins, and aware of the immense profits from A productions. So he cut back on the bread-and-butter productions and tried for prestige... and found himself shut out by the big, integrated companies, in Britain and the U.S.
Ivor Novello was a composer, musician, playwright, screenwriter, theatre actor/producer ....and... as this shows, a genuinely funny comedy actor too. He wrote this as well confirming what a talented, witty and insightful writer he was.
First of all, as a few others have said - what a surprise to find how funny he is. This is not what you'd expect from Ivor Novello. His very Welsh Russian accent is hilarious. His style is campy fabulosa - like a 1930s Kenneth Williams. Were he around today he'd have a weekly prime time tv slot. Like the best writers, he shares out to all of his cast equal funny lines and equal opportunities to shine. It's very democratic inasmuch that all the main cast have about the same amount of screen time and all have properly developed characters.
Another surprise is what a well made film this is. It's produced, directed and acted much better than a lot of films from 1933. The reason for its high quality is due to a guy called Julius Hagen, an incredibly ambitious German emigre who for a short time ran his own British film studio, Twickenham Studios. Two things now happened at the same time. 1. The Depression in America resulted in the American studios cutting production so they needed to outsource films to fill their cinemas. 2. Noticing that Korda at London Films made a fortune with his big budget HENRY VIII, Hagen thought he'd do the same. So in 1933 when UA needed product for the cinemas he abandoned churning out cheap 'quota quickies' and invested heavily into making a few high quality films like this. There weren't too many English films in 1933 made this well so this is something quite special which is what makes it still so entertaining today.
It's instantly engaging, intelligent and great fun. It's not the typical silly slapstick nonsense that was popular at the time but neither is it a high-brow, pretentious bore. In fact , it's got as many one-liners and subtle innuendos as you'd find in any Carry On film thirty years later. And one last observation - Ida Lupino sure was pretty!
First of all, as a few others have said - what a surprise to find how funny he is. This is not what you'd expect from Ivor Novello. His very Welsh Russian accent is hilarious. His style is campy fabulosa - like a 1930s Kenneth Williams. Were he around today he'd have a weekly prime time tv slot. Like the best writers, he shares out to all of his cast equal funny lines and equal opportunities to shine. It's very democratic inasmuch that all the main cast have about the same amount of screen time and all have properly developed characters.
Another surprise is what a well made film this is. It's produced, directed and acted much better than a lot of films from 1933. The reason for its high quality is due to a guy called Julius Hagen, an incredibly ambitious German emigre who for a short time ran his own British film studio, Twickenham Studios. Two things now happened at the same time. 1. The Depression in America resulted in the American studios cutting production so they needed to outsource films to fill their cinemas. 2. Noticing that Korda at London Films made a fortune with his big budget HENRY VIII, Hagen thought he'd do the same. So in 1933 when UA needed product for the cinemas he abandoned churning out cheap 'quota quickies' and invested heavily into making a few high quality films like this. There weren't too many English films in 1933 made this well so this is something quite special which is what makes it still so entertaining today.
It's instantly engaging, intelligent and great fun. It's not the typical silly slapstick nonsense that was popular at the time but neither is it a high-brow, pretentious bore. In fact , it's got as many one-liners and subtle innuendos as you'd find in any Carry On film thirty years later. And one last observation - Ida Lupino sure was pretty!
I've never seen Ivor Novello like this before. Everything I've seen him in always seemed hammy, melodramatic, and over the top but here he is in a comic role and throwing out lines like Paul O'Grady - he even looks a bit like him. Quite a revelation. Mr Novello was gay at a time when you couldn't be out in the open about it apart from in theatrical circles and, even though this isn't a gay character he's playing, his performance is quite camp. I don't know how well this film did at the box office but I know this was quite a successful play on stage in London's West End. It's a shame he didn't do more films like this.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaOne of Jack Hawkins' early films.
- ConexionesFeatured in Shepperton Babylon (2005)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is I Lived with You?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 40min(100 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta