CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.8/10
3.1 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Se centra alrededor de un grupo de amigos, fanáticos de los clubs, que encuentran apoyo en la comunidad gay tras una tragedia.Se centra alrededor de un grupo de amigos, fanáticos de los clubs, que encuentran apoyo en la comunidad gay tras una tragedia.Se centra alrededor de un grupo de amigos, fanáticos de los clubs, que encuentran apoyo en la comunidad gay tras una tragedia.
- Premios
- 4 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
Big fan of the original and the US remake.
This "reboot" or whatever you choose to call it, does not deserve the name of the show. The creators should have named it something entirely different, and maybe it would have been more accepted as it's own show, and not judged and rated with most comparing it to the previous versions.
This "reboot" or whatever you choose to call it, does not deserve the name of the show. The creators should have named it something entirely different, and maybe it would have been more accepted as it's own show, and not judged and rated with most comparing it to the previous versions.
- Also, it tries way too hard to be "woke" which most shows are doing now, and take every element and overdramatize it.
- Gave it a chance, left me feeling nothing- tried to cram too much into 8 episodes and like most shows like this, prob left viewers that don't know much about the real culture, thinking that all in the lifestyle are like these characters in real life.
I was curious about this series, but it turned out to be a mess. If they didn't want to be compared to the original UK and US versions, then they shouldn't have called it "Queer as Folk". They could have called it "Gays in New Orleans" or something similar. Calling it QAF inevitably leads to a comparison and this series fails.
The original UK and US series had much better writing and better cast. The originals didn't get hung up on the belief that they had to hire only gay actors, there was a mix. I don't care what an actor's sexual orientation is, only if they can give a quality performance.
Do I really care about most of the characters in this series, no. The incident at Babylon was terrible, but this is one drama queens performance after another. I found myself skipping ahead because the dialog was so bad. Few of the characters work and most gay men are not feminine, it's not real. At least in the US, more gay men have bachelor's degrees than the total US adult population and that shows focus and commitment which isn't apparent here. This isn't real gay life in the US.
I saw 6 episodes and gave up, the gay community needs a quality series not more of this.
The original UK and US series had much better writing and better cast. The originals didn't get hung up on the belief that they had to hire only gay actors, there was a mix. I don't care what an actor's sexual orientation is, only if they can give a quality performance.
Do I really care about most of the characters in this series, no. The incident at Babylon was terrible, but this is one drama queens performance after another. I found myself skipping ahead because the dialog was so bad. Few of the characters work and most gay men are not feminine, it's not real. At least in the US, more gay men have bachelor's degrees than the total US adult population and that shows focus and commitment which isn't apparent here. This isn't real gay life in the US.
I saw 6 episodes and gave up, the gay community needs a quality series not more of this.
I came to this series with a positive bias; I loved the earlier Brit and US versions. I just can't figure out what this series is trying to be. So far, it's a collections of stereotypes (promiscuity, flamboyance, emotional over-the-topness). As a gay man myself, I don't identify with any of these characters. What is the point of this show? To portray our LGBTQ+ community in the worst possible light?
The original UK series from 1999 was ground breaking but this, is a bit of a hot mess in comparison. It's like the production is demanding that every letter of the alphabet, and every colour of the rainbow be squished into each and every episode. There are more stereotypes than you can poke a stick at. Have the makers of this show ever heard the phrase, less is more?
For many years, queer film and television focused on tragedy: homophobia, the pain of coming out, unrequited love, and AIDS.
Now that all things queer have become widely normalized and ubiquitous, this reboot reaches back six years to exploit the true horror of the Pulse shooting - to Make Queer Tragic Again.
As in its previous versions, the self-obsessed characters still have the emotional and sexual maturity of 13-year-olds.
But the most galling scene shows them mocking a celebrity who exploits the fictional tragedy for media attention - in a show that exploits a real tragedy for media attention.
Now that all things queer have become widely normalized and ubiquitous, this reboot reaches back six years to exploit the true horror of the Pulse shooting - to Make Queer Tragic Again.
As in its previous versions, the self-obsessed characters still have the emotional and sexual maturity of 13-year-olds.
But the most galling scene shows them mocking a celebrity who exploits the fictional tragedy for media attention - in a show that exploits a real tragedy for media attention.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe character Ruthie is loosely based on writer and executive producer Jaclyn Moore who's also trans
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Queer as Folk have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 49min
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta