3022

The one thing that completely destroys this movies credibility within the first few minutes is the smoking of cigarettes on a space craft laden no doubt with Hydrogen and Oxygen, where does the polluted air go - utter nonsense - whoever wrote this travesty has not got a clue about the Sci-Fi genre or the technical realities of life in space.

Sadly that is what destroys this film from the off - terrible script and story that has been done to death before and this film gives us nothing new!

Dreary , boring and lifeless. I wanted to switch off within the first 15 mins but made it to the end in the hope it would get better - sadly not!

I will give it a average score for some decent commendable performance by the actors. Some deep space travellers get stranded in space after Earth mysteriously vaporises. Though having a cliched storyline in the the similar vein of movies like Sunshine ( 2007) and Event Horizon (1996), the suspense is decently maintained throughout the duration of the film. Well , do not just go in expecting Ridley" scott's Alien and u will be fine.

Despite the flawed first half, the second half picks u some juice . Overall could have been a better movie if there was better set design and production values. The special effects and props so are reminiscent of the 1990s that u will feel a dash of nostalgia . The story could have been better as the element of unpredictability is missing. The film falls flat in its script, plays more like family drama in space. My only gripe is that there is not enough Scifi-ness going on as u would find in movies in this genre.

Brilliant premise for a film BUT. Even with some robust parts, these mofos are smoking and complaining about life support failing... is it 1950?!

All I knew about "3022" when I sat down to watch it was that it was a sci-fi movie of sorts. I had no idea what the story was about, nor whom was in it. Normally, I am not overly keen on sci-fi movies, but was given the chance to watch it, so I did.

First I have to say that "3022" is not an overly interesting movie. In fact, it was sort of boring and very uneventful. More than once was I tempted to get up and go watch something else. But I endured and stuck with it to the end - to the boring, unsatisfactory end.

For a sci-fi movie then this 2019 movie from writer Ryan Binaco and director John Suits was mundane, generic and downright boring. There was simply way too little of any interest going on to keep the movie going and keep it interesting.

I will say, though, that the acting performances were good, despite of the actors and actresses having very little to work with. Most memorable in the movie was Angus Macfadyen, without a doubt, given his strong performance.

The movie is dark, a bit too dark if you ask me. It makes no sense that there was so little illumination about a space station. Sure, it sets the mood for a thriller or a horror movie, but it makes absolutely no common sense whatsoever.

I endured "3022" to the end, and can honestly say that this is not a movie that I will be returning to watch a second time. My rating of the movie lands of a less than mediocre four out of ten stars.

Different than your usual space thrill fest. It's simple a 'lost at see/last man standing' kind of plot but it moves along well. The acting is above average and the camera, lighting & sound are all solid. This isn't a multi-million dollar Hollywood blockbuster but it is an enjoyable piece of independent cinema with a sci-fi flavour.