Agrega una trama en tu idiomaStephen "Saberspark" Carver provides video essays and reviews about animation, entertainment, and the media.Stephen "Saberspark" Carver provides video essays and reviews about animation, entertainment, and the media.Stephen "Saberspark" Carver provides video essays and reviews about animation, entertainment, and the media.
- Creación original
- Estrellas
Explorar episodios
- Creación original
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
With his wit and informative yet still entertaining format, SaberSpark introduces obscure cartoons and shows many of us never even heard of regardless if they were good or bad. Most of them are bad and as a consequence have become memes on YouTube and elsewhere such as Google.
Probably the best known episodes of his are his review of Joshua and the Promised Land, Gaithers Pond, What's Up? Balloon to the Rescue, and Stravinsky and the Mysterious House. All of these I consider some of his best reviews. SaberSpark's is funny in how he analyzes these movies and shows. He'll explain what the premise is about, review a few clips, then go over his five points about the movie/show. Recently he's suggested improvements to them which's good. Many critics don't do that. At least the ones I've seen and if they do it's often in a condescending way.
I also like how SaberSpark's reviews are mostly straight to the point. A barb here, history lesson there but no long skit to further the point(not that they're always bad either). The focus' primarily on the movie and its origins. If you like so bad it's good, than you'll like this as well as the good material he reviews. I often like his viewpoints and format and I highly recommend him to others.
Probably the best known episodes of his are his review of Joshua and the Promised Land, Gaithers Pond, What's Up? Balloon to the Rescue, and Stravinsky and the Mysterious House. All of these I consider some of his best reviews. SaberSpark's is funny in how he analyzes these movies and shows. He'll explain what the premise is about, review a few clips, then go over his five points about the movie/show. Recently he's suggested improvements to them which's good. Many critics don't do that. At least the ones I've seen and if they do it's often in a condescending way.
I also like how SaberSpark's reviews are mostly straight to the point. A barb here, history lesson there but no long skit to further the point(not that they're always bad either). The focus' primarily on the movie and its origins. If you like so bad it's good, than you'll like this as well as the good material he reviews. I often like his viewpoints and format and I highly recommend him to others.
He is incredibly hard to ignore, in regards to the most obnoxious thumbnails on YouTube he takes that trophy with both hands. But for every recommendation, a thought occurs to me.
What could he bring to the table?
He seems to have found a market in telling us over and over again why bad CGI is bad, even though better reviewers have told us why. You look up one bad CGI movie, you're bound to find Saberspark's name. Guy's basically a borderline leech.
Beyond that, it seems he's too eager to play it safe and covers topics that're bound to get him that sweet sweet ad revenue and trust. Sensible people would feel his videos are unintentionally condescending.
People go for obvious targets usually because they're too afraid to do hot takes or potentially encourage further discussion on popular topics. For perspective, this guy singled out Fish Police against a major disappointment encompassing the writers and producers of Animaniacs.
Overall, this guy doesn't fill me with confidence.
What could he bring to the table?
He seems to have found a market in telling us over and over again why bad CGI is bad, even though better reviewers have told us why. You look up one bad CGI movie, you're bound to find Saberspark's name. Guy's basically a borderline leech.
Beyond that, it seems he's too eager to play it safe and covers topics that're bound to get him that sweet sweet ad revenue and trust. Sensible people would feel his videos are unintentionally condescending.
People go for obvious targets usually because they're too afraid to do hot takes or potentially encourage further discussion on popular topics. For perspective, this guy singled out Fish Police against a major disappointment encompassing the writers and producers of Animaniacs.
Overall, this guy doesn't fill me with confidence.
Presents nothing new in terms of content. They do what everyone else who reviews content is doing. They even go as far as to click bait in order to get views. Not only that, but they impose their opinions of others on their fans. Overall, disappointing.
I love Saberspark's channel. It may be "clickbait-ly" and a bit pandering, but it's very funny and a overall great experience and just what I need after a long day of school.
I've been watching Saberspark ever since I stumbled across his channel back in 2017, and I really enjoy his cartoon reviews. A lot of them are really entertaining, especially when he reviews some really bad animated films like Trolland or Joshua And The Promised Land. I also like how he analyses the stuff he reviews in 5 parts (Story, Voice Acting, Dialogue, Editing and Animation), and I also really like when he talks about how he could improve on the thing he's reviewing. Overall, he's a great cartoon reviewer and you should go give him a sub. ;)
¿Sabías que…?
- ConexionesFeatured in Freedom Toons: Animation Critic REKS FreedomToons ?!?!? (2025)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta





