CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.8/10
9.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Alice, madre soltera que trabaja como cuidadora de plantas en una empresa, se lleva una de ella como regalo para su hijo adolescente Joe, pero pronto empezará a arrepentirse de haberlo hecho... Leer todoAlice, madre soltera que trabaja como cuidadora de plantas en una empresa, se lleva una de ella como regalo para su hijo adolescente Joe, pero pronto empezará a arrepentirse de haberlo hecho.Alice, madre soltera que trabaja como cuidadora de plantas en una empresa, se lleva una de ella como regalo para su hijo adolescente Joe, pero pronto empezará a arrepentirse de haberlo hecho.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 8 premios ganados y 17 nominaciones en total
Jessie Mae Alonzo
- Selma
- (as Jessie-Mae Alonzo)
Marie Noel
- Colleague 3
- (as Marie Noel Ntwa Ydjumbwiths)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Anne Robinson meets the Little Shop of Horrors in a painfully slow, poorly disguised version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
Predictable, dull, illogical, unimaginative, and with a plot containing more holes than a monks collander
Thanks but no thanks.
Predictable, dull, illogical, unimaginative, and with a plot containing more holes than a monks collander
Thanks but no thanks.
Visually appealing but irritating. I don't know if that's what the producers of this were hoping for, and if so they managed to get on my nerves a lot. Everything from the music, to the main characters inability to register what's happening in front of her face. It's basically a film about a plant gaslighting a woman for two hours. I don't know what the film makers were going for and that makes this a bland and slow film
Scientists have created a flower that can make people happy. It is clear though that inhaling the pollen has a stronger effect than just that.
Whilst this is an attractive looking film with an interesting idea and a terrifically weird and wonderful score, the storytelling is linear and pretty staid without the twists and turns that could have made everything more interesting. In addition, the acting, whilst in part intended, is also a little too robotic by all involved to make you really care about the direction of travel.
Whilst this is an attractive looking film with an interesting idea and a terrifically weird and wonderful score, the storytelling is linear and pretty staid without the twists and turns that could have made everything more interesting. In addition, the acting, whilst in part intended, is also a little too robotic by all involved to make you really care about the direction of travel.
Im sure that you have read that this is a more modern retelling of invasion of the body snatchers. Don't think of it that way though. If you compare the 2 then my rating for this would go down. This feels more like a pretentious indie movie rather than a horror. The whole thing being about a flower was interesting, but the characters are boring and uninteresting. Which is disappointing considering that is what is supposed to hold this movie together. There isn't really a satisfying climactic scene that the movie builds up to and there is a ton of build up. The music in the movie was really odd to say the least and sometimes annoying. What can I say, I feel as if I wasted a lot of time on this movie.
I'll break this review down into three sections; Performance, Production, Plot.
Performance. Everyone is pretty much spot on. All the performances are reserved, which aids the intrigue of whether or not they've been infected and even when you're certain their performances always seem to leave you with a sense of doubt.
Production. This is the highlight of the movie. The sound design (both soundtrack and environmental) do a great job creating a sense of discomfort and foreboding. The costume and set design is beautiful and clinical, but also with great touches of vibrance.
Plot. By far the weakest area in the film and unfortunately what lets the film down. The idea is interesting and the way it's developed is interesting too, but plot points are often contrived or out of place and ultimately too little happens over too long a space of time to keep you fully engaged.
Performance. Everyone is pretty much spot on. All the performances are reserved, which aids the intrigue of whether or not they've been infected and even when you're certain their performances always seem to leave you with a sense of doubt.
Production. This is the highlight of the movie. The sound design (both soundtrack and environmental) do a great job creating a sense of discomfort and foreboding. The costume and set design is beautiful and clinical, but also with great touches of vibrance.
Plot. By far the weakest area in the film and unfortunately what lets the film down. The idea is interesting and the way it's developed is interesting too, but plot points are often contrived or out of place and ultimately too little happens over too long a space of time to keep you fully engaged.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAs stated in another post, the location is undisclosed. The street scenes were, however, filmed in Liverpool as you can see the Liver Building in the distance of one street scene.
- ErroresThe plant, "Little Joe", has no leaves, so that it cannot produce chlorophyll.
- ConexionesFeatures Catch Phrase (1986)
- Bandas sonorasRunning
Written by Teiji Itô
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Little Joe?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 23,862
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 10,626
- 8 dic 2019
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 208,821
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 45min(105 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta