CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.8/10
20 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un monstruo llamado Larry que se manifiesta a través de teléfonos inteligentes y dispositivos móviles.Un monstruo llamado Larry que se manifiesta a través de teléfonos inteligentes y dispositivos móviles.Un monstruo llamado Larry que se manifiesta a través de teléfonos inteligentes y dispositivos móviles.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Rodger Bumpass
- Squidward
- (material de archivo)
- (sin créditos)
Bill Fagerbakke
- Patrick Star
- (material de archivo)
- (sin créditos)
Kate Fenton
- Rude Shopper
- (sin créditos)
Jess Salgueiro
- Sonya
- (sin créditos)
Opiniones destacadas
I've seen better and worse, but for what it is, as a PG-13 horror movie, I think it does really well. It's short on scares, so don't go into this hoping to be scared out of your mind, but I think the emotional power that the message conveys is definitely worth a viewing. Definitely struck my heart strings by the ending. It's definitely derivative of several movies, but it's pretty good for sure.
Most characters have a story arch which is a rare thing in recent movies. The plot is simple and very predictable, but it doesn't hurt the overall enjoyment of the flick.
The horror is tense yet offers nothing new to the genre. The monster's design could remind you of some early 2010 creepypastas (you decide if that's good or bad to you).
Overall, it resembles The Babadook (2014), switching the book to everyday tech.
The horror is tense yet offers nothing new to the genre. The monster's design could remind you of some early 2010 creepypastas (you decide if that's good or bad to you).
Overall, it resembles The Babadook (2014), switching the book to everyday tech.
No, it's not a masterpiece that would deserve 10/10 as some have rated it here. But it's not a total crap either so it doesn't deserve 1/10 ratings either.
The story as a whole is actually good, something different. There are few jumps scares, some better than others, there's some creepiness at times. It's supposed to be a horror movie but at times it felt more as fantasy - I think that might be one of the reasons why this movie is rather weak, the director couldn't make up his mind what genre to choose.
The main actors, unfortunately, are terrible. The few ones that are actually ok play only secondary roles. The parents are annoying, you actually hope that at least one of them would die - they're so unlikable (I won't say if anyone dies or not because I don't want to give spoilers). Some the dialogues would make your eyes roll as well. I don't know what went wrong, the movie had so much potential to be so much better. I thought it might have been the budget but for 9mil (to compare: Babadook had only 2mil) I would expect something better.
In short: it's an "ok" movie. Definitely something different. The 5.9 score it has at the moment is fair.
And the acting police.
1. For all the crappy movies I have to wade through to actually find something worth watching these days is like finding a particular needle in a stack of needles.
2. This movie had an original plot, decent acting (despite what another "reviewer" had complained), it was creepy, and you didn't know the ending 30 minutes into it.
3. I gave this movie an eight because it's actually one of the better creepy movies I've seen in three months. I don't know about all of you, but indie movies are starting to grind on my nerves. I have to turn on the subtitles because I can't understand what they're saying most of the time. And then you have these user reviewers who critically acclaim movies where there's some hidden meaning in the ending that leaves you asking, "wtf was that and why did I just waste ninety minutes of my life I'll never get back to watch that bunk?"
So, this movie is not fantasy as another review suggests. It's a very decent horror movie that I think most people will enjoy.
So, this movie is not fantasy as another review suggests. It's a very decent horror movie that I think most people will enjoy.
I kinda forgot how the story went but i'm pretty sure this is just Babadook with iphones and fwends. The sfx isn't that great and some of the characters actions are questionable, but the spooks are pretty good, just the right amount of cheap jump-scares and smart atmospheric spoopiness here and there. Still, if you haven't seen Babadook i'd recommend that over this.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaDirector Jacob Chase used to make Haunted Houses for Halloween for many years which allowed him to practice making practical props and puppets. He hired the legendary Jim Henson's Creature Shop to create a 9 foot (2.74 meter) puppet for the creature for the film to be used alongside CG effects.
- Errores@ around 24 minutes a crew member's face can be seen reflected in Oliver's iPad (just before he turns round after hearing noises).
- ConexionesFeatured in FoundFlix: Come Play (2020) Ending Explained (2020)
- Bandas sonorasSpongebob Squarepants Theme
From the TV series Bob Esponja (1998)
Lyrics and Music by Blaise Smith, Derek Drymon, Mark Harrison and Stephen Hillenburg
Published by Tunes by Nickelodeon Inc. (Admin. by Sony/ATV Harmony)
Used with permission by Nickelodeon/Viacom Media Networks
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Come Play?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 10,475,990
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 3,119,875
- 1 nov 2020
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 13,182,254
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 36 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the streaming release date of Ven A Jugar (2020) in Germany?
Responda