CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
3.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un equipo legal se ocupa de casos que involucran condenas injustas.Un equipo legal se ocupa de casos que involucran condenas injustas.Un equipo legal se ocupa de casos que involucran condenas injustas.
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
It's really great to see Kelsey Grammar back on network television. Love a good criminal justice story.
The show is good not great, but it is a TV show, it is there for entertainment and for that it does it's job. I am so glad I don't live in America where every thing is analysed for political reasons and nothing is taken on face value, must be a really tough way to live your life.
So far so good, worth the watch. Intriguing, fast paced, good stories, good acting. Kelsey Grammar does well at playing the bad guy. Keep it going...
Injustice Defense Group in Chicago is a legal firm led by Madeline Scott (Rachelle Lefevre) who was herself falsely imprisoned. Her law partner Easy Boudreau (Russell Hornsby) exonerated her and her troubled brother Levi from their murder convictions. Ambitious D.A. Gore Bellows (Kelsey Grammer) was the prosecutor and is running for Attorney General on his way to the Governorship. He battles Madeline in court as more prisoners are exonerated. Bodie Quick (Vincent Kartheiser) is the investigator and Violet Bell (Nikki M. James) is the assistant/podcaster.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
Lots of trolling here. Only one episode and people can write it off so quick. Most shows take a few episodes before they get good. All of the shows out about law have been about finding people guilty. Its rare to have a show be based off of innocent people. It brings out the truth in our very faulty justice department. Trying to find the faults in the acting as some trollers here have mentioned, but i can't find the bad acting they are referring to. At least not the main characters. Don't listen to the 1 -5 star raters here. Take a chance and watch..and just like most shows, keep watching and it will get better and better. So far, i like it...
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaTodas las entradas contienen spoilers
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Proven Innocent have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta