CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
3.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un equipo legal se ocupa de casos que involucran condenas injustas.Un equipo legal se ocupa de casos que involucran condenas injustas.Un equipo legal se ocupa de casos que involucran condenas injustas.
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
I think the show was OK. The topic is very intriguing and quite realistic. The acting could be a little bit better though in my opinion. Let's see how it continues in the next episodes.
Injustice Defense Group in Chicago is a legal firm led by Madeline Scott (Rachelle Lefevre) who was herself falsely imprisoned. Her law partner Easy Boudreau (Russell Hornsby) exonerated her and her troubled brother Levi from their murder convictions. Ambitious D.A. Gore Bellows (Kelsey Grammer) was the prosecutor and is running for Attorney General on his way to the Governorship. He battles Madeline in court as more prisoners are exonerated. Bodie Quick (Vincent Kartheiser) is the investigator and Violet Bell (Nikki M. James) is the assistant/podcaster.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
Lots of trolling here. Only one episode and people can write it off so quick. Most shows take a few episodes before they get good. All of the shows out about law have been about finding people guilty. Its rare to have a show be based off of innocent people. It brings out the truth in our very faulty justice department. Trying to find the faults in the acting as some trollers here have mentioned, but i can't find the bad acting they are referring to. At least not the main characters. Don't listen to the 1 -5 star raters here. Take a chance and watch..and just like most shows, keep watching and it will get better and better. So far, i like it...
The bit parts are the best acted parts. Unfortunately the main character over acts her part and drags her costars with her. Too many sarcastic and angry lines and there is no character development at all. Could be good if the director gets to work and the writers learn to edit - just too many quick and underdeveloped plots happening.
Of the 3 new series I've watched in the last few days, this got my attention. Solid cast, tight script with a lot of moving parts, and a wealth of material to explore in future installments. I'm anxious to check out the next few episodes to see if they can sustain the same level of interest.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaTodas las entradas contienen spoilers
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Proven Innocent have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta