Una asesina implacable tiene menos de veinticuatro horas para vengarse de sus enemigos. Y otro detalle: en medio de la avalancha de muerte y destrucción, surge una conexión inesperada con la... Leer todoUna asesina implacable tiene menos de veinticuatro horas para vengarse de sus enemigos. Y otro detalle: en medio de la avalancha de muerte y destrucción, surge una conexión inesperada con la hija de una de sus víctimas.Una asesina implacable tiene menos de veinticuatro horas para vengarse de sus enemigos. Y otro detalle: en medio de la avalancha de muerte y destrucción, surge una conexión inesperada con la hija de una de sus víctimas.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
So ok this is my take. Every year the big studios are handed scripts, many scripts and many are rejected. How many scripts with the whole "trained assassin" have we seen? Netflix must get thousands with the same bloody main plot, and reject them. Warner Bros, Sony probably do too and keep maybe 2 out of a hundred. Netflix, on the other hand, get (say) a hundred of these assassin scripts and keep 50, and seemingly work through them making movies to fill a need. They love them. They tolerate much more, lame and average scripts, than you would expect a movie studio to... but then they are essentially a TV station, and have more time to fill.
This film is your typical double-hard assassin movie. Well made - I like the lead and supporting cast - plus it looks good, is watchable, but ultimately is generic and predictably unoriginal. The plot will have no surprises, and will be the least interesting aspect, but it won't offend you too much either. Maybe as a slightly older person, I have seen too many movies like this to be involved and excited by it. Were I half my age, with less experience of such film, I might have better things to say. As it stands, if you like this kind of assassin getting revenge movie, you'll have a good time. Just do not expect anything new here.
This film is your typical double-hard assassin movie. Well made - I like the lead and supporting cast - plus it looks good, is watchable, but ultimately is generic and predictably unoriginal. The plot will have no surprises, and will be the least interesting aspect, but it won't offend you too much either. Maybe as a slightly older person, I have seen too many movies like this to be involved and excited by it. Were I half my age, with less experience of such film, I might have better things to say. As it stands, if you like this kind of assassin getting revenge movie, you'll have a good time. Just do not expect anything new here.
There's actually a lot more to like in this new Netflix offering than one would expect: Mary Elizabeth Winstead makes a surprisingly capable action heroine, and the fight scenes are very well-staged and exciting. She goofs enough times, and faces enough adversity, to protect her from any accusations of being a Mary-Sue, and as a result we buy into her journey an awful lot more than we would a Rey, a Captain Marvel or Black Widow.
The dialogue is all filler, and the plot almost a carbon copy of better action films like John Wick, Lucy, Kill Bill, Hanna, Nikita and The Long Kiss Goodnight, but the Tokyo setting and nighttime cinematography look great, and all the actors pull off their roles pretty much faultlessly.
All in all, very predictable and containing nothing original of any kind, but a well-made and decent-enough popcorn-muncher if you're in the mood.
The dialogue is all filler, and the plot almost a carbon copy of better action films like John Wick, Lucy, Kill Bill, Hanna, Nikita and The Long Kiss Goodnight, but the Tokyo setting and nighttime cinematography look great, and all the actors pull off their roles pretty much faultlessly.
All in all, very predictable and containing nothing original of any kind, but a well-made and decent-enough popcorn-muncher if you're in the mood.
Good looking, fast paced movie with good fight choreography and a simple story. Basically, a female John wick. If not for a little too much sentimentality and a plot twist you can see coming from the start I would have given it an even higher score. Keep your expectations low and your gratitude high and you'll enjoy this one.
When 'Kate' (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), an expert sniper and lethal assassin, botches a job, she learns she has been poisoned and only has about 24hours to live. With her handler, Varrick (Woody Harrelson), she tries to finish her contract before she dies.
This film plays out much like 'Crank' (2006), in that Kate is on the verge of death and has to rely on using stimulants to keep moving. The cinematography is great and the casting is solid, especially with the snarky antics of Ani (Miku Patricia Martineau), but falls a little short in terms of believability. The twist at the end is predictable, but satisfying.
Worth a watch!
This film plays out much like 'Crank' (2006), in that Kate is on the verge of death and has to rely on using stimulants to keep moving. The cinematography is great and the casting is solid, especially with the snarky antics of Ani (Miku Patricia Martineau), but falls a little short in terms of believability. The twist at the end is predictable, but satisfying.
Worth a watch!
The world works in a kind of spiral, where everything 30 years ago becomes popular again, with small alterations. Kate is a story of a perfect assassin, betrayed and raising hell in the name of vengeance as poison is slowly killing her. Stylish, with Japanese neo-noir design, involving the Yakuza and greedy Westerners, it is a return to the 90s stories, where lone gunmen (people?) were dealing their own brand of justice in a corrupt and decadent world full of greed and inequality. Of course, the main character is female now, but you've seen this film before, a few times perhaps, and everything is pretty standard.
What shines trough the bland plot is the acting of Mary Elizabeth Winstead, who singlehandedly carries the film through. In fact, every other actor is an extra in the plot anyway, so she either made this film work or not. And it works. Kudos also to Jun Kunimura, who can, with a slight adjustment of body posture and a couple of facial expressions, tell an entire story in a second.
Bottom line: a predictable story from start to finish, but made well and acted well. Ridiculous body count which could have, with small changes to the plot, be significantly reduced and the time gained spent on storytelling.
What shines trough the bland plot is the acting of Mary Elizabeth Winstead, who singlehandedly carries the film through. In fact, every other actor is an extra in the plot anyway, so she either made this film work or not. And it works. Kudos also to Jun Kunimura, who can, with a slight adjustment of body posture and a couple of facial expressions, tell an entire story in a second.
Bottom line: a predictable story from start to finish, but made well and acted well. Ridiculous body count which could have, with small changes to the plot, be significantly reduced and the time gained spent on storytelling.
¿Sabías que…?
- ErroresKate is poisoned by Polonium-204, which the movie seems to suggest is more deadly than Polonium-210 (the more common isotope), but this is wrong. Polonium-210 is an alpha-particle emitter, while Polonium-204 is a beta emitter. Alpha particles (helium nuclei) are far more destructive inside the human body than beta particles (electrons). Kate would probably have survived Polonium-204 poisoning, but not Polonium-210.
- ConexionesFeatures Uchu kara no messeji: Ginga taisen (1978)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Kate?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 25,000,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 46min(106 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta