CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.0/10
3.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA century after the Wicked Witch, the Emerald City is at the mercy of a once-revered hero, and salvation comes from the wrench of young Victoria Wright. Rediscover old friends and meet new h... Leer todoA century after the Wicked Witch, the Emerald City is at the mercy of a once-revered hero, and salvation comes from the wrench of young Victoria Wright. Rediscover old friends and meet new heroes in this new tale set in the Land of Oz.A century after the Wicked Witch, the Emerald City is at the mercy of a once-revered hero, and salvation comes from the wrench of young Victoria Wright. Rediscover old friends and meet new heroes in this new tale set in the Land of Oz.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Elijah Dhavvan
- Gromit
- (voz)
Erik Hendrix
- Guard 1
- (voz)
- …
Scott McNeil
- Phadrig
- (voz)
Kiefer O'Reilly
- Kemp
- (voz)
Summer O'Reilly
- Noomi
- (voz)
Ron Perlman
- Magnus
- (voz)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
It's 100 years after The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Victoria Wright works endlessly to keep the steam engines under Emerald City working. The Witch of the North, Locasta, with her flying monkeys warns Victoria that Tin Man who now runs Emerald City is pushing the world to war as the city keeps expanding its destructive influence. Victoria helps Oscar 'Oz' Diggs escape who turns out to be the Wizard's brother. They meet Magnus, the son of the cowardly lion. They're joined by munchkins.
The animation is low grade CG. The story is a generally flat road movie. The most interesting part is the world construction itself. It's fascinating to see Oz 100 years later. The Tin Man story is intriguing. This does need a better road trip. The quest needs a different starting point. It should start with a munchkin losing its home due to Tin Man's Emerald City and the munchkin would head off to the city. The group would arrive at the city like traveling to the Heart of Darkness. This world is a wonderful world to play in. It just needs some better writing and more grown up CGI.
The animation is low grade CG. The story is a generally flat road movie. The most interesting part is the world construction itself. It's fascinating to see Oz 100 years later. The Tin Man story is intriguing. This does need a better road trip. The quest needs a different starting point. It should start with a munchkin losing its home due to Tin Man's Emerald City and the munchkin would head off to the city. The group would arrive at the city like traveling to the Heart of Darkness. This world is a wonderful world to play in. It just needs some better writing and more grown up CGI.
The animation is clunky, ugly, and looks at least 20 years older than its 2018 release date. But that's not the worst thing about this steaming (?punking) pile of garbage. It has a ridiculous plot riddled with non sequiturs, awkward and unnatural dialogue, a cheesy soundtrack that sounds at times acoustically unbalanced, and one of the worst attempts at a British accent ever recorded. We watched it as a family and really wanted to give it a chance, but by the end we were all laughing and shooting at the TV about how awful it was.
At least it brought us together! United in shock and revulsion that this film was ever given the green light.
At least it brought us together! United in shock and revulsion that this film was ever given the green light.
Good animation!! Ignore the post about it being bad and clumsy. It is a 3D cartoon. They aren't supposed to look like real live people. Take anime, which I personally loathe, it is an art form which, to me, is ridiculously repulsive, but how wildly popular it is. The main character's face and entire head/body is designed to look like a barbie type doll, and it is not stiffly animated at all. The characters have good body movements, facial expressions, etc. Background artistry is very good as well
With that said, there are two unfortunate things. Many of the voice overs (outside of the main 3 characters) are dull and uninspired. There should be some emotion or excitement of some kind behind many of the deliveries, but they are often deadpan
The story is a good one, but the lackluster voice overs prevent attachment and attention to the story, and there is also slow delivery of the plot. Not enough awe-inspiring side quests to keep you interested during the wait.
Not sure how the children will like it. I think it may be a little too slow for them as well but may be entertaining for awhile at least.
With that said, there are two unfortunate things. Many of the voice overs (outside of the main 3 characters) are dull and uninspired. There should be some emotion or excitement of some kind behind many of the deliveries, but they are often deadpan
The story is a good one, but the lackluster voice overs prevent attachment and attention to the story, and there is also slow delivery of the plot. Not enough awe-inspiring side quests to keep you interested during the wait.
Not sure how the children will like it. I think it may be a little too slow for them as well but may be entertaining for awhile at least.
As mentioned in other reviews, amateurish animation, but not so nearly amateurish as the script. The saving grace of the film was making the point "War is not the solution to our problems". Beyond that the concept was bland, characters cliche, and voice acting only as good as the script allowed. It's not a "bad" movie, just not good enough to call tolerable. Not even good as a children's film, as much of the morality-play aspect will be beyond their understanding. The ending (just after the credits start to roll) is incomprehensible and without point.
Basically, this is an unbelievable tale that really seems to make no point other than "Don't be the bad guy". Yeah, we get that much. How about the point, "If you're going to make a movie, make a good one"?
Basically, this is an unbelievable tale that really seems to make no point other than "Don't be the bad guy". Yeah, we get that much. How about the point, "If you're going to make a movie, make a good one"?
Watching this abomination with my daughter tonight and it made me feel so angry. I can't believe that this came out only a couple of years ago because it looked worse than toy story one, which came out more than 20 years ago. Unbelievably boring plot and terrible script and dialogue. This is not so much a movie as it is a torture device. Ron Perlman being involved is the icing on the cake, he'll clearly lend his voice for anything, this was probably the worst thing I've ever watched.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaRon Perlman provides the voice of Magnus, an anthropomorphic lion. In La bella y la bestia (1987) he played Vincent, who is either an anthropomorphic lion or a leomorphic human.
- ErroresThe end credits include a quote: "A heart is not judged by how much you love, but by how much you are loved by others". It is attributed to L. Frank Baum, author of The Wizard of Oz. This quote appears nowhere in Baum's writings. It was created after Baum's death by the authors of El mago de Oz (1939) film adaptation.
- ConexionesReferences El mago de Oz (1939)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Новые приключения в стране Оз
- Locaciones de filmación
- Tenerife, Canary Islands, España(location)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 3,205
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 19 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta