Opiniones de usuarios

I like most films about aliens, and thought i'd check this out, which i normally wouldn't based o the dire review score of 3.6, but i have 2 say it was ok to decent, certainly not 3.6. It was worth a watch which with so many dire terrible pointless movies around, is actually a recommendation, as i give most films about 20 minutes to get me interested,or there off. it deserves a 5 and many sci fi folk may quite like it.

Painfully slow and 90 minutes of your life lost forever.

The story is so suspenseful and mysterious, that I just don't have a clue what is going on. The ending twist just adds more confusion.

Despite the occasional glowing 8-10 star reviews, believe the negative reviews. This movie is pure tripe. It's very obviously not based on a true story-- it's as fanciful as they come. This is basic alien abduction with quite a bit of fictional nonsense thrown in for good measure.

While it maintains an air of mystery 2/3 of the way through (making one think it might wind up being a good movie), the last third is a nonsensical, ridiculous premise that one would have to be uber-gullible to believe. The explanation is convoluted, absurd, and ties nothing together.

In short, this is simply a poorly-made movie that relies on a claim of being a true story-- and Denise Richards-- to carry the film. This lacks all the elements of a well-made film. I don't often give a film 2 stars unless it's really bad, but this didn't deserve 3. Alien UFO abduction / whatever cow plop.

Is the fact that this movie is based on a true story lost on everyone? That fact alone increases ratings and reviews. Please do some research if you're not a believer. Get the views up so that more people will watch. We're almost at disclosure from our government, it's going to take a little more. LET"S WAKE PEOPLE UUUUP!

Good sci-fi, not pop culture sci-fi, but more pure sci-fi. Not exactly a star wars budget, but still an interesting story. Pulp sci-fi.

For a supposedly 'true story,' this sorry tale is awfully derivative of a number of earlier sci-fi flicks, all far better than this one. The slightestly astute viewer will notice the shameless inclusion of elements of Close Encounters, Village of the Damned, Deep Space Nine, Contact, and Stargate. Bren Foster is a terrible lead man; his acting is appropriate for first semester acting class. Denise Richards looks awful; her lips appear so full of silicone and her face rendered motionless with botox that her mouth barely moves as she delivers her lines. It surprise one to note that Randy Couture is the only actor to portray range and depth, despite playing a character that could have been as atrociously predictable as every other in this vapid script. Nothing original, absolutely nothing, happens in this movie. Literally, very little happens at all. The cinematography is uninspired film school quality and the direction seems have been completely absent. If the production had taken the matter less seriously, dropped the whole claim to a 'true story,' and played it up big for a campy B sci-fi flick, this empty story might have been more fun for the crew and actors to make, and so, more fun for an audience to watch. As it is, it is dreadful.

Based on a true story? What story, the one about how the writer couldn't come up with one?

Its a really bad movie. Bad acting, bad movie sets, bad story. The only reason I gave it 4 stars was cool cars and nice houses. A good movie to have on in the background while you play on your phone. 4/10.

Yeah, like watch something else. Or throw a brick through the tv screen. Or jab knitting needles into your eyeballs. Or gag into a bucket.

The director's daddy is rich? And not very bright? Who else would underwrite this mess?

I love the reviewer who said 'Wake up people. This is based on a true story.' Um, no it's not. Do you believe everything you read? This is incoherent dribble. The closest it comes to true is, well, yeah, the roads were real. So was the river. The rest is tosh: a tale, told by an idiot, based on nothing at all.

And only 58 characters to go...

Why is there smoke in just about every scene? Supposed to be fog? Well it isn't. It's smoke and it's senseless, like the... oh, there we go!

The Men in Black, they are excelent in this film. Their facial prosthetics were outstanding, just making them look normal enough to perhaps be human, but, maybe not :) Riveting lines for them and ideal acting from them. The make up people in this are good regarding the MIB design.

Confusion is an issue with the rest of the film, as is bad acting, terrible sound mix, I mean really bad sound, so much sound missing it ruined the film, plus highly distracting ADR.

The shot framing is poor, casting fair to poor, direction lapse, and stylistic continuity across the film is poor.

The story, well it was a good concept but very hard to swallow because the film didn't suspend disbelief very well. Comes across like a film student's first film's rough cut before the editing began.

I can't believe the people that are making reviews without watching this movie. I have no idea why the producers tagged this movie with such an idiotic introduction. I watched this movie and I never lost interest or knew what was going to happen next. In my opinion, this is a very well made movie and very much worth a watch. I am a science fiction fanatic. This is either very pure realistic science fiction, or it could be true.

I cannot say that I "enjoyed" the movie, but I certainly did not hate it. I did see a lot of potential that was wasted and the film is made to by mysterious for a reason that fell short. Then the ending showed that it did not know where it wanted to go. It had a bit of matrix, Stargate, and riverworld mixed in with other alien abduction movies. I feel bad for the actors who had to work this movie though I think they allowed me to give it a 6.

I think you have to be a die hard alien fan and be into all the alien stories over the decades to have enjoyed it. Its following or referencing things such as Roswell ruins it for those who know the stories have been debunked or shown not to be true. Also, coming from a science background shows how shaky some of the concepts were in the movie. Yet, I enjoyed it enough that I would watch it if it was a boring day and nothing better was on TV. At least, it is not as bad as some movies I have wasted time on. That is why I give it a 6. Its an ok movie at best.

The opening claim to be a true story probably spoiled the film for me it is quite obviously not , it sort of spoiled what it actually is a half decent science fiction story .

Yes The story has been done before and there are lots of bits stolen from other much better sci-fi films but I quite enjoyed it most of the actors did a decent job and a lot of the special effects or cgi were fairly decent however there is for me at least no reason to watch it again and the ending was pretty naff but There were a couple of plus points for the film some very pretty scenery and some really nice cars on show , worth one viewing for sci fi fans.

I enjoyed this movie. Interesting story- Bren Foster carried the movie and I would honestly watch it again