Inherit the Viper

I thought this was a great movie .... Dark and atmospheric. Josh Hartnett is very good in the first thing I've seen him in for sometime.

The story doesn't develop the background of the three siblings much, so I don't really feel for them at all. The story isn't so engaging either. I felt rather bored by it.

Answer: He Inherit (ed) the Viper.

Around 15+ years ago, he was being touted about as being one of those Next Big Hollywood Things. But he seemed to keep choosing the wrong "star vehicles" (E. G. Hollywood Homicide), whilst truth be told, arguably lacking a bit in the charisma department and then appeared to depart mainstream cinema.

To my surprise he bobs up in this independent production and in my opinion is one of the best reasons to see it. Based on his work in Inherit the Viper, his future lies best, in seeking out more character - based roles, rather than star turns as a leading man.

Inherit the Viper is by no means a great film. It's a slow - burning rural noir piece, that doesn't particularly feature any really pleasant characters. Hartnett, playing Kip, the oldest of a trio of siblings with a family history of trafficking in prescription drugs, plays (arguably again), the nicest of a bad bunch. He'd really like to escape the drug trade, but family pressures, combined with a lack of employment opportunities, keep conspiring against him.

At 85 minutes running time, Inherit the Viper is by no means a lengthy film, but here's the thing; it feels longer. The pace is somewhat languid. The script, whilst lacking a certain amount of exposition in some areas, (Was it ever really made clear, what Bruce Dern's character had to do with the Conley family?) does set up an acceptably realistic twist in the denouement, that I have to admit, I didn't see coming and therefore enjoyed it, that much more. The acting is more than acceptable, with Hartnett, as mentioned, the stand - out.

Kudos to Anthony Jerjen, in his feature directorial debut, for trying something a little different. Inherit the Viper is not going to blow your socks off, and don't expect any action set pieces. But for those prepared to hang around, there is an interesting conclusion and a fine, understated performance from Hartnett, which kind of holds everything else together.

I did and this is no where near true. Some parts, the devastating losses and deaths but idk meeting a kid in a field for two bottles of pills and get handed a supposed duffel bag full of cash. First of all I don't care if those pill bottles had 100 oxy 80's each, that would still only be able 15 thousand dollars. So enough to fill a duffel bag? Nah I don't think so. The kid that got injected when he was murdered by Josie? It takes a lot longer for someone to shoot a drug and feel the effects. It's not boom, needle in arm in 1 second.

I'm still waiting for a good opioid epidemic movie that just captures the true story of it. Something about Florida's oxycontin express, the pill mills in browsed county, deaths, arrests, shady doctors. Not just the addicts of it. We need a good movie to show the full story.

This was a good try but yeah it's obvious the director/writer whoever didn't really understand this world.

Fear the Viper or inherit the viper ... there may be another title for this in the country you are hailing from ... and are watching this of course. But it seems like the viper remains ... as is the poison of said snake. Sometimes you kind of know what to expect, I reckon.

But even so, it may not mean that you can be fully prepared. I'd say this is quite predictable when it comes to the fate or where the road leads for our main characters. That being said, it is still more than decent. Even if it didn't really grab me as much as I think it had the potential to do ... especially the impact certain things are supposed to have. The acting is more than solid and the cinematography was really good too. It just felt like it was missing something special to put it over the top ...