CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
3.5/10
8.7 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA pharmaceutical company repeat the mistakes of the past and creates super intelligent bull sharks, who decide they don't want to be lab rats anymore.A pharmaceutical company repeat the mistakes of the past and creates super intelligent bull sharks, who decide they don't want to be lab rats anymore.A pharmaceutical company repeat the mistakes of the past and creates super intelligent bull sharks, who decide they don't want to be lab rats anymore.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Jeremy Boado
- Daniel Kim
- (as Jeremy Jess Boado)
André Jaques
- Skipper
- (as Andre Jaques)
Opiniones destacadas
The acting was atrocious all around. I wanted all of the characters to die. The plot had so many holes, the script was likely written by a middle school student, and the set was obviously low budget. I made the mistake of watching it before looking at the IMDB rating. After the torturous hour and a half, I looked on IMDB, saw the 3.2 rating (which is generous), and then saw that the channel "SyFy" had purchased the movie. Oh my, that's worse than straight to DVD. If you are looking for a good shark movie, don't waste your time with this one. The sharks don't really get enough screen time.
Just....awful.
Michael Beach is a journeyman actor, but even cannot save this POS. Let's review:
1) A shark scientist who looks like a stripper (Or the director/producer's girlfriend) 2) Assorted people around to get eaten by sharks. 3) A billionaire who travels alone 4) A billionaire who apparently has only a single attorney 5) Zodiac boats used for traveling to locations way offshore 6) A shark trainer who doesn't seem to understand sharks. 7) A shark scientist who's also a pain in the a*s whiner 8) Zero suspense 9) Nobody who understands science working at the facility (You know...like physics) 10) Not a single character who you can care about.
Terrible film that would have been better on Syfy as an Asylum project. Avoid,avoid,avoid.
Michael Beach is a journeyman actor, but even cannot save this POS. Let's review:
1) A shark scientist who looks like a stripper (Or the director/producer's girlfriend) 2) Assorted people around to get eaten by sharks. 3) A billionaire who travels alone 4) A billionaire who apparently has only a single attorney 5) Zodiac boats used for traveling to locations way offshore 6) A shark trainer who doesn't seem to understand sharks. 7) A shark scientist who's also a pain in the a*s whiner 8) Zero suspense 9) Nobody who understands science working at the facility (You know...like physics) 10) Not a single character who you can care about.
Terrible film that would have been better on Syfy as an Asylum project. Avoid,avoid,avoid.
The first one was much better. The acting was better in the original. More action, also.
I just don't understand why this film exists. The first one was, for me, the best kind of shlock. Fun characters, random and shocking deaths, absurd plot...it was undoubtedly stupid but it was fun and that's why it worked.
This one doesn't have any of that. It's just cheap with lame uninteresting characters in a horrible looking set. The undersea lab is just plain pathetic, it looks like it's straight out of a 1990's C-movie, that's how dated and lame it is. I got about 40 minutes into this and nothing happened, the acting was terrible, there's no special effects, it's just a pointless movie.
Don't waste your time watching this.
This one doesn't have any of that. It's just cheap with lame uninteresting characters in a horrible looking set. The undersea lab is just plain pathetic, it looks like it's straight out of a 1990's C-movie, that's how dated and lame it is. I got about 40 minutes into this and nothing happened, the acting was terrible, there's no special effects, it's just a pointless movie.
Don't waste your time watching this.
When you go into this just be aware it was bought by the Scifi channel so expect the usual low budget effects and terrible acting and you won't be too disappointed.
I did not know that sharks squeak when they are angry - you learn something new every day...Like not to watch movies like this unless you are drunk or stoned!
Some shocks but not much , not really what shark movie fans would find scary - Stick with great movies like Jaws, Open Water , The Reef and the original Deep Blue Sea but this doesn't compare on any level!
I did not know that sharks squeak when they are angry - you learn something new every day...Like not to watch movies like this unless you are drunk or stoned!
Some shocks but not much , not really what shark movie fans would find scary - Stick with great movies like Jaws, Open Water , The Reef and the original Deep Blue Sea but this doesn't compare on any level!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIn Alerta en lo profundo (1999), the shark facility is called Aquatica. In the sequel, the shark facility is called Akheilos. In Greek mythology, Akheilos (or Acheilus) is the son of Zeus and Lamia. Akheilos offends Aphrodite, boasting that he is more beautiful than she, and is then transformed into a grotesque shark-like creature.
- Errores(at around 49 mins) Sharks have no vocal cords, or any other method of making sound, but Bella's pups all shriek.
- Citas
Trent Slater: Sharks don't eat nerds.
- ConexionesFeatured in Minty Comedic Arts: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Deep Blue Sea (2019)
- Bandas sonorasInto the Blue
Written and Performed by Sean Murray
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Deep Blue Sea 2
- Locaciones de filmación
- Cape Town, Western Cape, Sudáfrica(South Africa)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 34 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta