Feng zai qi shi

I don't know, but why does Hong Kong always make these crime films? It's been over done so many many times why can't they take note from Korean Cinema? These Hong Kong crime drama is such an old genre that nobody watches any more. They over done it and it's becoming boring typical of Hong Kong to make these kind of crime films which nobody really cares for. Why waste good talent with these films. I'm serious, every film coming out of Hong Kong and China has just been really stale. The ideas are stale and the this film is stale. I wish they rethink about their way of filmmaking. The next wave is Korean cinema which is refreshing and full of surprises. I hope they learn a lesson from it! Stop making pointless cop drams that nobody watches or cares about!!!

Most of the time, Hk movies that are financed elsewhere has a two dimensional problem. They look good, damn good. And with big stars. International stars at that.

But that's it. In this case, a possibly 12 hr miNi series cut to 2.5 hrs. So editing chops the story to bits and pieces. Feels like shot by 2-3 2nd unit directors and then multi edited. The plot is too sprawling, ambitious, yet also too condensed for its own good.

The dancing attributes are just tailor made for Aaron.

Dancing doesn't make sense to this kind of story. Mixed genre here doesn't jive. The rhythm to the speeches, dialogue, monologue scenes for Tony seemed very off, rushed, one take-ish, had no drama, no underlying thoughts.

The camera wants to be romantic and stays between 85mm to 180mm. Very distracting, some obviously can be seen as homage/copying old Tony Leung's movies.

All body, not content. All show and no depth. Walked off around 45min mark.

The premiss of this cop drama is quite promising. It depicts a scenario in which the dedication of the few honest officers amongst Hong Kong's colonial police have to combat both their own crooked comrades as well as the increasingly powerful Triad gangs that are gradually overrunning the place - to the extent that the British might have to send in their troops to restore law and order. What also complicates the story is that both "Nam Kong" (Tony Leung) and "Lui Lok" (Aaron Kwok) are aspirational policemen who are prepared to use whatever it takes to get on - and that, coupled with the equally ambitious attitudes of their wives, means that they are just as corrupt and devious as those they are purporting to be trying to control. The thing with this drama is it's pace. It takes far, far, too long to get going with way too little action or intrigue until well into the second hour, by which time I was starting to wriggle in my seat. There's an inevitability about the whole story thereafter and Philip Yung just doesn't manage to create characters about whom I could care less. The whole honour code/triad criminality plot is largely neglected in favour of an half-hearted, semi-westernised, crime thriller that really is distinctly lacking in thrills and that is just too long. It meandered and rambled too much for me with much to much dialogue and nowhere near enough focus on what could have been a really good hybrid-culture, political, adventure. It's OK, watchable, but really nothing more.

Where the Wind Blows boasts two super stars in Tony Leung and Aaron Kwok, but it is a total snooze fest at 2h 24min. The story is about a few good men in a sea of dirty cops and politicians. The storytelling is so choppy that after a while you will feel like puking out all the rubbish history lessons forced down your throat. It is well-acted no doubt but the story is not even coherent. It's like in any scene there is a beginning, a middle and an ending, but the director will just show you one out of the three and wants you to connect the dots. Such an utter waste of good actors. The moral lesson is that you should be the baddest bad guy because you can retire to Canada or Thailand and nothing will happen to you. Avoid this like it's the newest variant of COVID-19.

Where the Wind Blows is a big-budgeted arthouse crime epic that is a love letter to Hong Kong and its history. Aaron Kwok and Tony Leung deliver charismatic performances as Lui Lok and Lam Kong, two of the four corrupt police commissioners in Hong Kong, spanning from the 1940s to the 1990s. It's an ambitious film with a big gushing heart and has much to say about Hong Kong but struggles with conveying it all succinctly.

Through a romantic nostalgic lens, director Phillip Yung directs the film like a set of glossy nostalgic postcards, featuring snapshots of Hong Kong in each decade, from the Japanese occupation to poverty to its stability and eventual flourish. The production design, costumes, and music exquisitely pop off the screen.

Structured like a kaleidoscopic collage, the story follows the Lui Lok and Lam Kong characters through the historical timeline, covering history, politics, and the romantic relationships with their wives. It is epic through its 50-year span and intimate through its use of voice-overs and flashbacks.

It reminded me of Martin Scorsese's Casino at times, where we intimately live inside the characters' heads, privy to their innermost thoughts.

Aaron Kwok does a great job reimagining Lui Lok as a straight-faced, tap-dancing romantic hero with an insatiable drive. Kwok naturally projects an eagerness, which he precisely tones down to fit Phillip Yung's idealistic vision. The real Lui Lok was likely closer to Francis Ng's rough-hewn portrayal from Once Upon a Time in Hong Kong.

Tony Leung is charming and understated as the debonair piano-playing Lam Kong. His character is often off-the-side and soft-spoken, but it was impressive how much Leung was still conveying from doing so little. Phillip Yung devotes a lot of screen time to developing Lui Lok and Lam Kong; the contrast is what hooked me throughout the whole movie.

While I enjoyed Du Juan's performance as Choi Chan, Lui Lok's wife, the subplot about her helping him behind the scenes undermines what the real-life Lui Lok achieved by systemizing bribery in the 60s.

There's a lot of praise behind comedian Michael Hui's role as an ICAC agent. The performance is not bad but I was more moved by the speech itself. My take is Hong Kong audiences just miss seeing Hui onscreen.

All that said, Where the Wind Blows is convoluted and overloaded. At 2 hours and 44 minutes, even with fast-paced editing, there's too much information to take in. There's a crucial plot point where the four police commissioners have a disagreement that is murky and unclear. Plot threads are connected in ways that are unexpected and it gets challenging keeping up with them all.

Audiences going in with the expectations of a linear traditional crime epic will leave disappointed by a lack of guns blazing in the finale. It's not the Godfather, nor is it Infernal Affairs.

This is Phillip Yung paying a loving tribute to Hong Kong and its history, as if to say, "Look how far we've come." That Hong Kong sentiment is heartfelt. I enjoyed being in Phillip Yung's Hong Kong as a romanticized memory. Yung is not showing how events happened, but rather how we'd ideally remember it as a collective dream.

Where the Wind Blows requires a second viewing. There's still so much to unpack and it was a dense history lesson. The film will have a better chance of finding its audience through streaming where it has the benefit of being paused, rewound, and rewatched. I suspect I'll like it, even more, the second time.