Shockwave

2017
Unrated
1h 30min

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

3.6/10

1.1 k

TU CALIFICACIÓN

A stolen seismic weapon is activated in Yemen. A hostage freed there tries in vain to warn against its global effect. It starts seismic activity at the Californian fault line where her daughter and ex are monitoring it. Can they stop it?

Reproducir trailer1:44

1 video

16 fotos

Action Adventure Sci-Fi Thriller

Cuando una serie de erupciones volcánicas empiezan a tener lugar, la geofísica Kate Ferris intenta convencer al Departamento de Defensa de que estos fenómenos no tiene un origen natural, sin... Leer todoCuando una serie de erupciones volcánicas empiezan a tener lugar, la geofísica Kate Ferris intenta convencer al Departamento de Defensa de que estos fenómenos no tiene un origen natural, sino que son resultado de algún tipo de armamento.Cuando una serie de erupciones volcánicas empiezan a tener lugar, la geofísica Kate Ferris intenta convencer al Departamento de Defensa de que estos fenómenos no tiene un origen natural, sino que son resultado de algún tipo de armamento.

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

3.6/10

1.1 k

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

Videos1

Trailer 1:44

Official Trailer

Fotos16

+ 10

Opiniones de usuarios29

3.61.1K

Opiniones destacadas

1pubquiz

Ignore the fake voting

This is so bad it should have gone straight to Audio 0 / 10

1headtagsniper

I normaly watch any sci-fi but this is painfully bad !

This film is really bad, the special effects seem to be made my someone with their pocket calculator and the script is just sad with no scientific facts what so ever, and my dog can act better !

I never write reviews but I had to warn people of the scam that this film is and the 6 star rating is fake !!!!!!!!!

2tony_allen-66636

typical low budget movie

Not up to much for me but if you like fake superimposed explosions it might be your thing. As above review states I feel its sad the review system is fixed as certainly does not deserve an 8?!

3jasonsalmon-52014

Bad and they knew it.

I get that a lot of people grew up watching scifi movies and have these big grand ideas that they think will make next great scifi movie, you can skimp on the special effects if you take that into account when planning out the film, you can skimp on the actor rates if you spend more time finding the right unknowns, but when aim high with the effects but don't have the budget, when you aim for sexy and talented actors but only have enough budget for one and you choose sexy and when you have a director that really overestimates their vision you end up with lame movies like this, you knew this film was lame and that's why you bought the 500 7,8 and 9 rating votes on here. Next time just put all your effort into making an engaging and immersive story, then find the most talented actors you can get with your budget, then and only then if you have money left do you go for the sexy and the flashy explosions. Overall I give it a 3/10, It would have been a 2 but I just feel sorry for the people involved so I added one.

1Snootz

Because they deserve it

I'm rating this one star for very obviously gaming the IMDB rating system. Anyone well-acquainted with this system can spot fake rating stats almost immediately. 800+ "high" ratings. However of those 800+ ratings we find only 3 reviews... and all of them negative. I would tend to believe those 3 reviews more than the 800 questionably high ratings.

I've said it before and will say again: If you have to fake your own ratings, you've already failed... and not just in film making.

Más como esto

2.6

3.5

3.0

4.4

2.7

4.5

7.6

2.2

2.6

2.1

4.1

Argumento

Editar

¿Sabías que…?

Editar

Errores
At 0:04:16, a gentleman is in the back of a pickup firing a .30 caliber machine gun which has no belt being fed in to it and no empty cartridge's being ejected.