CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
1.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una notable historia inspirada en la vida del ganadero de Chickasaw, Montford T. Johnson, un hombre que superó grandes dificultades para establecer un imperio ganadero a lo largo de la famos... Leer todoUna notable historia inspirada en la vida del ganadero de Chickasaw, Montford T. Johnson, un hombre que superó grandes dificultades para establecer un imperio ganadero a lo largo de la famosa carretera del oeste americano, Chisolm Trail.Una notable historia inspirada en la vida del ganadero de Chickasaw, Montford T. Johnson, un hombre que superó grandes dificultades para establecer un imperio ganadero a lo largo de la famosa carretera del oeste americano, Chisolm Trail.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Good drama/action/historical movie. I was impressed by the dedication, perseverance, and patience of Montford, and how it pays off in the long run. As opposed to Dodgeball (the underdog reference), this is actually based on a true story, which I didn't know beforehand but confirmed with some google-ing.
It's watchable. There's just enough good to slightly outweigh the bad. It's a passable ride
It's a bit melodramatic, the acting is inconsistent, the direction is not very good, the dialogue is anachronistc, but the story (true) is good, the cinematography is good, and it's an ok way to kill some time. I'm retired. I do that.
The ending is unsatisfying. If you're going to present a character in such a way that you're meant to HATE them, want them to suffer a slow death, etc., then show his comeuppance. There are a couple characters that need killin, but it's only insinuated that they get theirs.
It's not a multiple watch deal. I've seen Shawshank 7 million times. This isn't Ike that.
It's a bit melodramatic, the acting is inconsistent, the direction is not very good, the dialogue is anachronistc, but the story (true) is good, the cinematography is good, and it's an ok way to kill some time. I'm retired. I do that.
The ending is unsatisfying. If you're going to present a character in such a way that you're meant to HATE them, want them to suffer a slow death, etc., then show his comeuppance. There are a couple characters that need killin, but it's only insinuated that they get theirs.
It's not a multiple watch deal. I've seen Shawshank 7 million times. This isn't Ike that.
Story was excellent. This was not a Marvel Universe level budget so with that in mind it was about the story and the acting. I enjoyed the story very much and appreciated the work of all the actors. Very much a feel-good story that accurately depicts some of the obstacles Native Americans dealt with during those times.
The basic story about Montford: The Chickasaw Rancher is an exciting tale from the time when the West still was so called wild and there was a frontier to conquer. Typically and necessarily there are rustlers and indians involved, but this is based on true historical events about Montford Johnson, an influential half indigenous pioneer, his family, neighbours, friends and their struggles. The setting should be right for a thrilling and epic drama, but due to several factors the creators fail to realise its intensions. First of all it's hard to fully believe in the characters, like with Martin Senmeiser in the main role. Compared to the real Montford he's just too Hollywood handsome, and together with several of the cast, he neither looks like a poor starving and extremely hard working rancher in the 1870's. Many simply appear as modern people dressed up in oldstyle gear. Moreover, even though the villains got better and more dirty makeup, their wickedness is clearly exagerrated and there's an obvious overacting. Generally the performances aren't very impressive. However, there is an important sidestory, and letting the conflict between the indigenous peoples, settlers and the US Army have a more indirect role, where historical events and characters merely pass by as news, or certain people are coincidentally included as the storyline moves on. This may have a good intention, but even a crucial setting fundamental for the final is barely given any focus. Also, like with some peculiar timeholes in the basic plot, basic connections are't worked through well enough, and we never get to know the characters. Maybe this would be better off as a mini series, or at least a film longer than 95 minutes. A more creative building of characters, where the historical context got a more direct and intensional interplay, together with a more thorough screenplay and editing plan, this could have been a good historical western.
In the first half, this bad screenplay (instantly discernable by its overuse of narration) would have made a fair Radio play had it been written 80 years ago. Unable to convey information and emotion through dialog and imagery, they reduced an inspiring story to a poorly executed TV drama.
You can create great films with low budgets, poor writing, bad direction or editing but seldom do you find a video play lacking in all of these.
The last half is like a different production. The awful narration ends, the actors find their rhythm, as the pace picks up, and the story is allowed to blossom, capturing one's imagination.
So, maybe it was just a lack of time and money after all.
You can create great films with low budgets, poor writing, bad direction or editing but seldom do you find a video play lacking in all of these.
The last half is like a different production. The awful narration ends, the actors find their rhythm, as the pace picks up, and the story is allowed to blossom, capturing one's imagination.
So, maybe it was just a lack of time and money after all.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaMultiple descendants of Montford T. Johnson, including his great granddaughter, are extras in the movie.
- ErroresAt 34 minutes, Momtford is looking out over the horizon while talking with his wife. On the horizon you can see moving car lights.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Montford: The Chickasaw Rancher?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- The Chickasaw Rancher
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 4,000,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 36 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Spanish language plot outline for Montford: The Chickasaw Rancher (2021)?
Responda