Agrega una trama en tu idiomaAn in-depth look at the culture of Los Angeles in the ten years leading up to the 1992 uprising that erupted after the verdict of police officers cleared of beating Rodney King.An in-depth look at the culture of Los Angeles in the ten years leading up to the 1992 uprising that erupted after the verdict of police officers cleared of beating Rodney King.An in-depth look at the culture of Los Angeles in the ten years leading up to the 1992 uprising that erupted after the verdict of police officers cleared of beating Rodney King.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 6 premios ganados y 3 nominaciones en total
Daryl Gates
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Tom Bradley
- Self
- (material de archivo)
Damian 'Football' Williams
- Self
- (as Damian Williams)
Henry Keith Watson
- Self
- (as Henry Watson)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
This documentary is fairly enthralling, and contains a lot of extremely useful information. It makes a good point of pointing out the shady decision making and terrible events that led up to the L.A Riots, and it really puts those events front and center. However, there are very odd editing choices made throughout the documentary that have the capability to throw the viewer out of the experience.
There are drops in audio, moments of complete silence, weird fades to black, interviews without names of who we are seeing talk to us, awkward breaks in the flow of conversation and in the flow of the entire documentary. The events and terrible choices and racially motivated hatred that led to these riots are important to know, and they are probably more important now then ever because we are still living with this systematic racism in our police across the US. However, the editing for this documentary leaves a lot to be desired.
There are drops in audio, moments of complete silence, weird fades to black, interviews without names of who we are seeing talk to us, awkward breaks in the flow of conversation and in the flow of the entire documentary. The events and terrible choices and racially motivated hatred that led to these riots are important to know, and they are probably more important now then ever because we are still living with this systematic racism in our police across the US. However, the editing for this documentary leaves a lot to be desired.
The title is absolutely misleading. It is not a documentary about the racial tensions in LA between the 80s and the 90s. It is built up to justify the looting and the killings during the 92 Riots as a consequence of white men brutality. The racism of part of the black comunity towards the koreans is totally overlooked. The guys attacking and almost killing Reginald Denny appear as victims of social injustuice. The honest people (black, white, asian), who were the real victims of criminals hiding their actions behind the racial excuse, are almost forgotten. Adressed only to the guilt ridden conscience white upper class intellectuals.
This was a superb documentary! The doc not only shows the LA riots but the events from the past decades leading up to it. It does a great job of presenting the various perspectives surrounding the era. I really recommend it!
For the most part, this is really good documentary filmmaking, with a slightly too long runtime and occasionally flawed editing holding it back (unless the abrupt cuts to black were intended to be there for commercial breaks, if this was a TV movie? Even then, it still could have felt smoother).
Funnily enough, the lead up to the protests/riots ends up being far more compelling, despite those events being comparatively less explosive. That may be a consequence of watching this after LA 1992, which I think is a slightly better film, and did a better job at showing - on a visceral level - the events in LA over those days in 1992.
Both are very much worth watching, though, and if you treated them as an exhausting double feature, you'd get a great recap of the history followed by a more cinematic (for lack of a better word) depiction of the aftermath of the Rodney King trial.
Funnily enough, the lead up to the protests/riots ends up being far more compelling, despite those events being comparatively less explosive. That may be a consequence of watching this after LA 1992, which I think is a slightly better film, and did a better job at showing - on a visceral level - the events in LA over those days in 1992.
Both are very much worth watching, though, and if you treated them as an exhausting double feature, you'd get a great recap of the history followed by a more cinematic (for lack of a better word) depiction of the aftermath of the Rodney King trial.
11/15/17. This was actually a good documentary about a decade of unrest and chaos. Both sides get to tell their story, the black community that felt put upon by the police, and the police trying to do its job without offending the black community and the politicians. It was a sad time, but no sadder than it is today.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaJohn Waters named this film among his top ten favorites released in 2018.
- Citas
Tom Bradley: We are determined to take back the streets of Los Angeles, to run the hoodlums off the streets and return them to the decent law-abiding people of Los Angeles.
- ConexionesFeatures Rodney King Beating Video (1991)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas 24 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Let It Fall: Los Angeles 1982-1992 (2017) officially released in India in English?
Responda