Establecido más de siete años después de que el mundo se haya congelado, Snowpiercer se centra en los restos de la humanidad, que habitan en un tren gigantesco y en constante movimiento que ... Leer todoEstablecido más de siete años después de que el mundo se haya congelado, Snowpiercer se centra en los restos de la humanidad, que habitan en un tren gigantesco y en constante movimiento que da vueltas alrededor del globo.Establecido más de siete años después de que el mundo se haya congelado, Snowpiercer se centra en los restos de la humanidad, que habitan en un tren gigantesco y en constante movimiento que da vueltas alrededor del globo.
- Nominado a 1 premio Primetime Emmy
- 10 premios ganados y 33 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
Like most people, I enjoyed the movie enough to give this show a chance. Season 1 was good enough, with some glaring issues but not TOO many. Season 2 was still watchable, but a clear decline in quality. As for Season 3, it has been painful just to get through each episode, and I'm only still going because I very rarely just stop watching something mid season after I've invested many hours in it already. I truly don't even know where to begin, when explaining why the current season has been so bad. Many reviews have already stated how bad of an actor the guy who plays Layton is, but even the characters who were once interesting and often likeable are barely recognizable anymore. Also, the attempts at artistic shots and dialogue fall flat every single time; it feels like a college student wrote most of the monologs. I'm currently on episode 8 of Season 3 and will, at the very least, finish with this season... but not because it is interesting or captivating. Rather, just out of a general curiosity to see where they're going with the show and to confirm my theory that it can't get any worse (even though episode 7 proved me to be painfully wrong already). You've been warned.
First of all lets make one think clear, this is a show in a sci-fi setting and Sci-fi has always been experimenting with cheesy and illogical concepts. I don't know why people forgot that. Of cource the idea of a endlessly running train isn't realistic nor would the class system of the train work in real life, but thats not the point of the show. You wouldn't say that fighting with laser swords or travelling through time in a car is very realistic, but it is definitely fun to watch. That is why (at least for me) Snowpiercer works. Is it a show that would win awards for groundbraking acting or writing? No, probably not. But the story is definitely thrilling, the set pieces are fascinating and I am extremely invested in the show.
I always thought the 2013 movie was too short, so after watching the movie i found myself reading the French graphic novel Le Transperceneige, later re-titled Snowpiercer 1: The Escape, created by Jacques Lob and Jean-Marc Rochette, and published in 1982.
In my enthusiasm, I also read the subsequent sequels, The Explorers and The Terminus.
Then years later i come across this Snowpiercer TV series and right from the start i am into it. The first 2 seasons follow the first book loosely with some additions and omissions.
The show starts strong, especially in the first two seasons, with great world-building and solid storylines. However, by Season 4, it slows down, and some parts feel stretched out. Jennifer Connelly and Sean Bean keep things interesting though, with Connelly adding real depth to her character, even when she disappears from the story at times.
Daveed Diggs doesn't quite fit the role of such a major character; there are several moments where his acting feels awkward and out of place.
Overall its a good and entertaining show, better then the movie but worse then the graphic novel series.
In my enthusiasm, I also read the subsequent sequels, The Explorers and The Terminus.
Then years later i come across this Snowpiercer TV series and right from the start i am into it. The first 2 seasons follow the first book loosely with some additions and omissions.
The show starts strong, especially in the first two seasons, with great world-building and solid storylines. However, by Season 4, it slows down, and some parts feel stretched out. Jennifer Connelly and Sean Bean keep things interesting though, with Connelly adding real depth to her character, even when she disappears from the story at times.
Daveed Diggs doesn't quite fit the role of such a major character; there are several moments where his acting feels awkward and out of place.
Overall its a good and entertaining show, better then the movie but worse then the graphic novel series.
The show has so much potential, but the leading actor is just not as good as the show deserved. He's a rapper that hadn't play anything like this before. He's got the same face under any circumstances, proving he's still an apprentice and should give some steps backwards and start from the bottom. It's such a pity!
Wilford actor and Melanie actress simply overtake the show in order to save it.
Wilford actor and Melanie actress simply overtake the show in order to save it.
For those stating that the premise of a train wrapping around the globe that has to keep running is too unrealistic - that is correct. Though it's a great metaphor for how our class based elitist society is part of a never ending circle that, given the right circumstances , could entirely collapse at any moment.
So no, train like this isn't possible. But that's not the point. Watch the story unfold and if need be pay attention to everything else and let the train part fall to the background. Either way, it's an interesting story and the acting is well done. The scenery is amazingly well thought out , and for a pilot episode they did decent job knocking it out of the park.
I wasn't the biggest fan of the film- but I'm quite interested to see how they do with this. So far, so good.
WARNING - you do need an imagination to watch this show. So if you take everything too literally you won't enjoy it.
The only unbearable part of this show is daveed Diggs- he doesn't sell the part very well at all. The show would be much better without him as a centrepiece: it's a shame they couldn't find Idris or someone a bit more captivating in their acting - Diggs is lacklustre at best and he's outshined by every other character , even the background ones.
So no, train like this isn't possible. But that's not the point. Watch the story unfold and if need be pay attention to everything else and let the train part fall to the background. Either way, it's an interesting story and the acting is well done. The scenery is amazingly well thought out , and for a pilot episode they did decent job knocking it out of the park.
I wasn't the biggest fan of the film- but I'm quite interested to see how they do with this. So far, so good.
WARNING - you do need an imagination to watch this show. So if you take everything too literally you won't enjoy it.
The only unbearable part of this show is daveed Diggs- he doesn't sell the part very well at all. The show would be much better without him as a centrepiece: it's a shame they couldn't find Idris or someone a bit more captivating in their acting - Diggs is lacklustre at best and he's outshined by every other character , even the background ones.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe train needs to be in constant motion, which happens due to its perpetual engine (as seen on the blueprints in the opening sequence) called the "Eternal Engine". If the train were to stop for more than thirteen minutes, everyone would freeze to death.
- ConexionesFeatured in Good Morning America: Episode dated 14 May 2020 (2020)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Chuyến Tàu Băng Giá
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta