Smolensk
- 2016
- 2h
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
1.2/10
40 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Inspirada en hechos reales del misterioso accidente del Tu-154 de la Fuerza Aérea Polaca en 2010 en Smolensk, la película cuenta la historia ficticia de varias personas afectadas por la trag... Leer todoInspirada en hechos reales del misterioso accidente del Tu-154 de la Fuerza Aérea Polaca en 2010 en Smolensk, la película cuenta la historia ficticia de varias personas afectadas por la tragedia.Inspirada en hechos reales del misterioso accidente del Tu-154 de la Fuerza Aérea Polaca en 2010 en Smolensk, la película cuenta la historia ficticia de varias personas afectadas por la tragedia.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Smolenskin' garners mixed reactions, with praise for its artistic vision and emotional depth in depicting Polish families' suffering. Documentary elements and factual presentation are commended, despite its fictional nature. However, many criticize the film for subpar acting, low-budget effects, and a chaotic script. Some argue it promotes conspiracy theories and political agendas, acting as propaganda. The portrayal of the Smolensk plane crash is particularly contentious, with insights for some and misleading, one-dimensional views for others.
Opiniones destacadas
What most reviewers and voters are missing - it is NOT documentary, so it simply can't be judged as one. You wouldn't expect "Abraham Lincoln vs. Zombies" to be judged only basing on historical accuracy would you? Basically it is a movie that bends some facts to make those events more dramatic and movie itself more entertaining. It is listed as "Drama, Thriller, Inspired by true events" and it does a quite good job as that if you use some common sense.
Sure, Hollywood productions with 10-50 times bigger budgets give you more bang for those few bucks spent on tickets, but it is worth seeing anyway.
Music is decent, acting is fairly good most of the time, there is few bits that could use more post processing as it is fairly noticeable that those are green screen scenes.
Sure it has plenty of flaws, some (mainly script) are even critical ones - no one would plant multiple exploding devices on the plane when just one is enough, plus - there must be many other ways to destroy a plane without leaving any actual evidence. But again - it is a FICTION loosely based on actual events. It is not a work of investigative journalist but just entertainment.
All in all - worth seeing if that topic even remotely interest you.
Sure, Hollywood productions with 10-50 times bigger budgets give you more bang for those few bucks spent on tickets, but it is worth seeing anyway.
Music is decent, acting is fairly good most of the time, there is few bits that could use more post processing as it is fairly noticeable that those are green screen scenes.
Sure it has plenty of flaws, some (mainly script) are even critical ones - no one would plant multiple exploding devices on the plane when just one is enough, plus - there must be many other ways to destroy a plane without leaving any actual evidence. But again - it is a FICTION loosely based on actual events. It is not a work of investigative journalist but just entertainment.
All in all - worth seeing if that topic even remotely interest you.
I've watched this movie two times. First in the cinema, and recently at home. I cannot honestly find any upsides in it. The plot is "thin" and "expected". Acting is very poor and completely unrealistic. Overall it is a very bad movie. I don't recommend it unless you've enjoyed Killer Tomatoes Attack France and you just watch it for laugh.
If You want to waste Your time, You can watch it.
Film tries to show real catastrophe as plane bombing using cheap actors, cheap special effects, boring action and dialogues although it is targeted to people which believe in conspiracy theories.
Film tries to show real catastrophe as plane bombing using cheap actors, cheap special effects, boring action and dialogues although it is targeted to people which believe in conspiracy theories.
Worst movie I've ever seen. Bad script, very poor acting. Exaggerated animations. Unfortunately, the film tells a distorted and untrue truth.
It is a fictional vision that has been never confirmed, the acting, writing and everything is so bad in this.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaMarian Opania was offered the role of President Lech Kaczynski. He declined it sternly, saying in interviews that he was not going to help create "rubbish assassination theories."
- ErroresIn the opening sequence at the Smolensk Airbase, IL-76 making a landing attempt is clearly seen (despite very dense fog) with no flaps extended.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Smolensk?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Smoleńsk
- Locaciones de filmación
- Varsovia, Mazovia, Polonia(location)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 3,000,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 2,336,032
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
- 1.85 : 1
- 16:9 HD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Smolensk (2016) officially released in India in English?
Responda