CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.9/10
2.2 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA pharmaceutical sales rep visits a small town in Louisiana on business. He finds himself in a dark world of corruption and murder with 24 hours to live, running from the police, the mob and... Leer todoA pharmaceutical sales rep visits a small town in Louisiana on business. He finds himself in a dark world of corruption and murder with 24 hours to live, running from the police, the mob and a sheriff that wants him dead.A pharmaceutical sales rep visits a small town in Louisiana on business. He finds himself in a dark world of corruption and murder with 24 hours to live, running from the police, the mob and a sheriff that wants him dead.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 premios ganados y 3 nominaciones en total
Stephen Cyrus Sepher
- Vince
- (as Stephen C. Sepher)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I give this film a max of 4 stars,because its a non-impressive and low cost production,with below average acting cast, a complex plot that is rather simple,but it kills itself because its too slow.
what i really miss from this louisiana based d-riller is the lack of lousiana dialect in the dialouges,not a single person speaks the good ol' southern sway.not even the local police, nor even the hookers or gangsters does.that is a lousy job.
its a film of money,vaccines,poisoning,hookers,fine boats and cars,blood,deceift,crooked police and shadow hals..
whats the 4 stars for? well,nice cinematography and well driven musical score (although not my taste), and some parts of the storys locations are good.
wanna see it again,definately not
Watched it because of the high rating, then I realised it was obviously the cast and crew artificially bumping the IMDB score up.
Very average movie all around from actors, casting, premise, dialogue, setting, story progression etc etc
Not worth a watch unless you are really bored!
Very average movie all around from actors, casting, premise, dialogue, setting, story progression etc etc
Not worth a watch unless you are really bored!
Dead on Arrival (2017) has an intriguing premise. An innocent man learns he has been poisoned and has less than twenty-four hours to discover who poisoned him and why. This was the premise of D.O.A. (1949), starring Edmond O'Brien, and D.O.A. (1988), starring Dennis Quaid and Meg Ryan, and has been used in a few other minor productions.
The original film, which I haven't seen, won several accolades. The 1988 remake received mixed reviews, but I agree with Roger Ebert, who liked it. Unfortunately, DoA suffers from a weak script which repeats the superficial elements of the earlier films, but fails to incorporate the elements that made them memorable. Quaid's Dexter Cornell was poisoned because he knew something of no apparent significance. While searching for the truth, he learns that his life is actually much more intertwined with that of a second victim than he imagined. He must work essentially alone, because he becomes a suspect in a murder investigation, but manages to solve a series of crimes which baffled the police. In his final day of life, he experiences more passion than he had in the prior decade.
DoA has none of these deeper elements. Billy Flynn's Sam Collins is poisoned to advance a sinister plot that doesn't seem to have much chance of success. While the bodies pile up all around him, he has no relationship to most of them, other than having met them briefly the prior evening. He doesn't manage to solve the crime. Instead the dots are connected for him by another character. While there is a suggestion that he might survive the poison, he doesn't grow or mature during his final day.
For a film that seems to have been produced on a modest budget, the production values aren't bad. The actors do as well as can be expected with the material they're provided. The performances are probably the strongest element in a disappointing film.
The original film, which I haven't seen, won several accolades. The 1988 remake received mixed reviews, but I agree with Roger Ebert, who liked it. Unfortunately, DoA suffers from a weak script which repeats the superficial elements of the earlier films, but fails to incorporate the elements that made them memorable. Quaid's Dexter Cornell was poisoned because he knew something of no apparent significance. While searching for the truth, he learns that his life is actually much more intertwined with that of a second victim than he imagined. He must work essentially alone, because he becomes a suspect in a murder investigation, but manages to solve a series of crimes which baffled the police. In his final day of life, he experiences more passion than he had in the prior decade.
DoA has none of these deeper elements. Billy Flynn's Sam Collins is poisoned to advance a sinister plot that doesn't seem to have much chance of success. While the bodies pile up all around him, he has no relationship to most of them, other than having met them briefly the prior evening. He doesn't manage to solve the crime. Instead the dots are connected for him by another character. While there is a suggestion that he might survive the poison, he doesn't grow or mature during his final day.
For a film that seems to have been produced on a modest budget, the production values aren't bad. The actors do as well as can be expected with the material they're provided. The performances are probably the strongest element in a disappointing film.
This film caught my attention on my cable provider for on-demand.
So I looked it up on IMDB and checked out the user reviews and noticed some nasty comments about the film. I decided to also look at the external cretics reviews for the film and noticed twice the apposite critical reviews on the film. I checked out the sources behind the critic reviews and they all checked out legit. I saw the film last night and actually enjoyed it very much, so I guess the critics were right about the film and I have no idea why some people are talking nasty about it. I think I It was an entertaining ride.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFeatures Christa B. Allen's only nudity (as of March 2022). A portion of her butt crack is seen as she lies in bed.
- ConexionesRemake of Con las horas contadas (1949)
- Bandas sonorasThe Money
Performed by Nazo Bravo
Written by Nazo Bravo (as N. Aslanian) & Todik Todik Todd Tarverdian
Courtesy of Mighty Hye Records & Kedot Music Group LLC
All Rights Reserved
Mixed by Taron Eliazaryan
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Dead on Arrival?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- También se conoce como
- Смерть по прибытии
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 2,500,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 37min(97 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta