Atardecer

1913 is a year that fascinates me. It was the last year of an order that reigned in Europe and the world for almost a century, established at the Congress of Vienna that had traced in 1814-15 the borders of Europe and the relations between the great powers of the time. Of course, it had been a century with many events - the 1848 revolutions, the emergence of new national states (Germany, Italy, Romania among them), conflicts and regional wars - yet Europe had been spared of major continental scale conflicts as the 30-year War or the Napoleonic wars had been in the previous centuries, and the balance between the great powers seemed relatively stable, also influenced by the relations between the royal and imperial families that reigned in many of the countries of the continent. Contradictions and conflicts were accumulating, while the more sophisticated classes benefited from a life style close to decadence. Europe had several cultural capitals - Paris, of course, but also Berlin, Vienna, Prague, or the newcomers Budapest and Bucharest - cities where the arts flourished in parallel with the underground rottenness. The fascination for this last moment of bourgeois tranquility and escapism that was 1913, a moment before the storms of the 20th century, is shared by many authors of books and movies. Hungarian director László Nemes, is the latest with his recent film 'Sunset' / 'Napszállta'.

László Nemes also faces the 'second film' syndrome, which are suffering from the directors who have made an exceptional debut. After 'Son of Saul' enjoyed an exuberant reception by critics and collected about all the major awards for foreign films (including the Academy Award and BAFTA for best foreign language film) three years ago, expectations are high. 'Sunset' is undoubtedly an ambitious movie. Nemes chose the year 1913 to launch a warning about the contemporary period, similar in his views to the accumulation of contradictions, the differences between the styles and the levels of life of the social categories, but above all similar in ignoring the acute problems facing Europe today. The Austro-Hungarian Empire, which was less than a year after 1913 to be engulfed in WWI, and which would disappear in five years, is a metaphor for today's Europe, another multinational empire suffering of escapism, ignoring the gathering problems or not finding the real solutions. In such times people seek their identity, so does the heroine of the film, Írisz Leiter (Juli Jakab), a young woman coming to Budapest in search of the truth about the death of her parents, about the fate of the hat store left to them in heritage, and about the destiny of her brother, whose existence she learns about, shrouded in a fog of mystery and fear.

László Nemes likes to put his audiences to test. With the story at hand he could have made of 'Sunset' a Gothic mystery with elements of historical drama mixed with 'horror'. These elements are present in the film, but the criminal intrigue does not seem to be the focus of the attention of the director (who is also co-scriptwriter). More important seems to him to be the ambience, an end-of-the-empire Budapest. The cinematography seems to be in tune with the name of the film, obscure lighting that leaves the feeling that night is permanently coming, which makes of the light of the few scenes shot in daylight to seem almost blinding. Part of the story is related to the hat making business, with the beautiful 1913 fashion creations that would make the English royal house of today jealous, a craft and symbol of a twilight world. The actors are superb, with Juli Jakab in the lead role combining the determination and defiance of social rules with an inner power that compensates for her fragility. Romanian star Vlad Ivanov is as good as always (I do not remember him acting a bad role in a movie or on stage ever), embodying Oszkár Brill, the hat store owner, a useless beauty factory, an apparently respectable institution, also hiding vices and dark stories between its walls. He speaks his role in Hungarian, and unfortunately I do not know this language well enough to judge whether he speaks impeccably or with some accent that may suggest a stranger in a cosmopolitan world.

'Sunset' is a beautiful and interesting movie, but the lack of attention or decision in the narrative thread loses the spectators at some point, or at least, it lost me. The characters appear and disappear before they have been completely defined, the same situations are repeated with small variations, and many of the details of the story are not concluded or explained. I could not avoid a feeling of length and repetition, and the open end added another enigma without clarifying anything that has happened until then, which does in my opinion add another element of dissatisfaction. László Nemes does not need to prove anything, he already has made to himself on merit a name among the important filmmakers of today's Hungary and Europe. He should now just pay more attention to his spectators.

I saw this movie, in an unpremeditated way, kindly accepting the choice of a friend who absolutely wanted to see it. So without any a priori at all. Pros: photography, costumes and sets are all 3 excellent. We really feel in Budapest in 1913. Cons: this is an unintelligible and almost unpleasant sequence of scenes; it's ultra-rough!. A dozen times, I asked myself: what's the relationship between the current scene and the previous one(s)?!? I can not believe that this movie was directed by László Nemes, author of the unforgettable and poignant El hijo de Saúl (2015). According to some people, it's art and/or an advanced form of expression. Well, well, well, ... Honestly? I didn't understand a damn thing. Really!

In summary: visually amazing but desperately boring ... Please László, come back to earth!

Greetings again from the darkness. Hungarian filmmaker Laszlo Nemes mesmerized us with his first feature film, SON OF SAUL (2015), the Oscar winner for Best Foreign Language film. That debut was an incredibly unique viewing experience centered on the Holocaust at Auschwitz. Mr. Nemes got much of the band back together for this follow up, and their collaboration, while a bit frustrating to watch, is again quite fascinating to look at.

Mr. Nemes co-wrote the script with his SON OF SAUL writing partners Clara Royer and Matthieu Taponier (also the film's editor). And for those that share my frustration in watching the film, it's the story that is likely to blame. Is there a story? Certainly not in the traditional sense - which makes it difficult to follow or try to explain. Irisz Leiter (played by Juli Jakab) is first seen being fitted for fine hats in the elegant shop that bears her family name. We soon learn her parents both died, and she has been absent from the city for many years. The new owner, Oszkar Brill (Vlad Ivanov, 4 MONTHS, 3 WEEKS AND 2 DAYS, 2007) is startled to learn of Irisz's return, though we aren't sure why he is so uncomfortable around her. Irisz soon discovers she has a brother (a surprise to her) and that he is quite notorious in these parts.

Much of the film focuses on Irisz trying to track down her brother, and then track him down again. That's the closest thing to a plot we get. Mostly it's a succession of scenes where people ask questions that never get answered. In fact, there is minimal dialogue to go with the now-familiar camera work of cinematographer Matyas Erdely who utilizes his SON OF SAUL first person perspective with background fuzzed out so that we see what one person is seeing. There is an underlying theme of what is apparently a corrupt part of a mysterious sub-culture in the society - even involving the Royal family. Keep in mind this is 1913 Budapest and war is at hand.

The set design and costume design are extraordinary ... especially the lavish hats from the era. The score is from Laszlo Melis (also from SON OF SAUL), and while Ms. Jakab is pleasant to look at, the story is disorienting and unfulfilling. The approach with the camera work is designed to force us to see things through the characters' eyes, but it's not enough to offset the incoherent and aimless wanderings of Irisz as she collects scraps of information that may or may not be pertinent. Perhaps you are smarter than I am, and will be able to connect the dots ... or at least find dots to work with.

Couldn't get myself to watch the second half. Dialogues were dull, plot was not interesting, couldn't relate to any character or felt for any of them.

As a Hungarian I was stunned at this pointless disconnected script.

I guess this film is feigning art.

Loved the costume and period photography. What is the background or the foundation for this plot, if anything.

If this period was pre WW I why all the bombed out buildings in the set?