En la ruta del narco

Running With The Devil: Nicolas Cage has every opportunity and reason to chew up the scenery in this film but he resists the the temptation. A take of drug running, following the trail from a remote farm in Colombia via mexico and the US to Canada. Cage is sent by his boss to find out who is hijacking shipments and also to discover who is cutting the coke with dangerous additives. Laurence Fishburne is a middleman with Leslie Bibb as a DEA agent with a personal score to settle. Extreme violence, double-crosses, nobody ever quite who they seem to be and a few plot surprises. Nothing particularly original but certainly a watchable thriller. Directed and written by Jason Cabell. 6/10. On Netflix.

A movie with Nic Cage and Laurance Fishburne should have been more crazy than that but it wasn't bad, the movie was good enough to keep me watching and it got better at the end and it's far better than other cage movies like 211 or A SCORE TO SETTLE but not as good as Mom And Dad or Mandy

This is far better than you might expect from an under-the-radar Nicolas Cage film. The dialogue is very good and delivered honestly by a very competent cast. The story is believable (except for the bit about flying and skydiving, where they could have used a consultant). The editing made it concise and effective. There is a raw, unadorned feeling to the whole production. The arc finished the tale off in a very satisfying way without giving me time to check my watch. This is a successful film and one to be proud of. And, it shows that with good quality material, Cage is a very likable, convincing actor. I'm happy to see him in a film like this, for a change.

Tried, tired and tested failed narrative on "The War on Drugs" movie. The failure to see the thing you're setting out to "have a war on" as being the thing that makes it worse, while you're apparent goal is prevention...

The biggest problem being, your mentality that presented a problem that justified a war is one of delusion. That problem won't go away until you see and accept that delusion for what it truly is and so you'll keep on perpetuating that problem until you do, as it's one if your creation by demanding society needs to be edited as though society can't make their minds up themselves but needs a Big Brother to whip them into submission!

It's one which has it's epicentre, upon control. That control is to target society in a mechanism to supply and police, creating a perpetual game of cat and mouse, where as a problem you're fuling by your war, you can justify the advancement of control. Just like Terrorism...

When you're behind this system, such a chase is a very desirable one. So you inflict it and keep a society docile to this reality. To keep a society bamboozled by this game, is equally desirable. By this method, they will either conform or be policed! They're either agaisnt the Terrorism or a Terrorist Sympathiser. Everything becomes polarised by a reality we are trying to beat into submission as though those behind this system know better and can present their argument within the makeup of many movies as they do.

George Orwell would be proud of this inverted concept we can see depicted via this movie. This is done well, maybe this movie can help present this. It all depends on the perception of those watching the movie as it isn't forced this wa, it takes an analytical view on what the movie is actually presenting. It's this which may leave some inevitably numb as though some lack of direction or concept was lost on the movie, while it inevitably does point within a certain direction it desires you to believe without giving you any clarity or pushing really hard on what that direction is without analysis. It uses a light touch to push that same old narrative as though you'll collectively perceive that desired perception via the prior political conditioning of society and so it needs no heavy introduction.

While leaving the idea that the good guys won? Or is it actually the Devil himself? Whom keeps up the supply to justify the policing?

It's within this lose candid method the movie is put together some may find lacking of narrative. As the movie is edited together in a way to present a string of events without much deep underlying context within some respect, where the point of the movie, beginning to end maybe lost upon them due to the movie not delivering because it demands them to think for themselves, while also being a morality tale that those whom watch the movie may not necessarily agree with. They may not see the Duality of the characters. There's not much development of many characters, this is very weak and so you can't really feel them from their point of view.

This being why you could feel more negatively towards this movie. You can't feel an individual side you're compelled to support and so the outcome may leave some feeling uncomfortable or nonplussed, but it also can leave one believing the War on Drugs is a good one, we just need to do more if they accept the movie at face value and where it inevitably takes us. It's the pushing of this failed narrative as though it's one which is justified, which makes the movie for me disappointing.

It really doesn't test the acting of all those involved whom have almost certainly been in better movies than this. It's almost as if many of the actors took part within this film under a contractual obligation to be within another movie they would much rather be apart of, while going along with this movie to continue the push upon this same old political narrative, that we may as well be hearing the echo chamber of "build that wall" as the movie ended, while we didn't actually hear them. It's this theme throughout the movie that we can feel a desire to be swayed in our thinking without actually hearing that message, its desired that we contrive to think and feel a certain way that I suspect many people just don't want to buy into nor accept anymore.

It would be far less compelling to create a movie about the mass of "Cocaine In America" as delivered by the "CIA" and not the cut outs within the drugs trade as it may otherwise appear, much as cut outs within the Terrorist trade. That would give the game away. It would mean they couldn't get away with doing what undoubtedly is done by the use of both the War on Drugs or Terrorism and this movie had a chance to deliver this to an audience but failed to deliver by the way it was presented, leaving blanks for speculation where some may not speculate at all but just think and feel the movie stinks...

So we have this respinning to push - ironically as this ideology is more dangerous than any drug - the same old narrative of the failed War on Drugs used to target, threaten and police society as much as a War on Terrorism. The Intelligence Apparatus would love to combine the two I'm sure. It fell short of successful delivering the what it otherwise actually may have originally set out to deliver. It's as though it may have been designed to deliver this message, but some influential people forced the hand of some one to edit out parts of the movie they don't want in it. While readjusting the movie back around an acceptable political narrative other than the original message that may have otherwise been desired by the creation of this movie...

It leaves a stale taste and that maybe designed to be directed towards fuling the continuation of this War on Drugs or it maybe this way for me because I believe the Devil has pulled the wool over the eyes of many and remained Triumphant at the end of the movie...

It's worth a watch for sure but it won't be something I'd rush to watch again unless it receives an extended edition, with parts that had previously been cut out from this movie reintroduced that hasn't been edited via the censorship office - Ministry of Truth - as acceptable via dictionaries dictated via the principles of Newspeak.

I'm a simple guy, I see Nicolas Cage - I watch the movie. Furthermore, he's joined by Laurence Fishburne, Barry Pepper, Clifton Colins Jr. and some other previously seen & heard names. To be honest, it's easy to get into these thrillers, because I already know what to expect, all it takes is 2 minutes long look at the cast, director, plot and ...the poster.

"Running with the Devil" is not a great movie, but it's hard not to enjoy it. Lets get the bad qualities off the table first. Despite taking place in over 15 different locations & across two continents, story lacks any narrative inspiration, rhytm or complexety. It doesn't even make sense at some points. The structure is choppy, the climax is weak & there's not nearly enough good old fashioned action. However, we have come here for the cast. It's indeed an enjoyable romp of many characters - Laurence Fishburne snorting coke and being extremely horny, Adam Goldberg being a bit*h, Nicolas Cage doing ...his thing, and so on and so forth. Seriously though, while the script is very, very weak and directing uninspiring, "Running with the Devil" is kept afloat with a steady pacing dragged on by the amount of characters and locations, with the awesome cast doing their thing & with a pretty fine cinematography and (sometimes questionable) editing.

You will be running with the devil because Cage & Fishburne runs with it & later You're going to be running for another movie. I'm sure that I can positively recommend this flick to anyone who's a fan of the cast and/or a fan of this particular & familiar low budget average thriller niche. The key is knowing what you'll get. I enjoyed this 5/10 quite a lot.