Largometraje de animación basado en el popular cómic sobre un gato sarcástico amante de la lasaña.Largometraje de animación basado en el popular cómic sobre un gato sarcástico amante de la lasaña.Largometraje de animación basado en el popular cómic sobre un gato sarcástico amante de la lasaña.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 premios ganados y 2 nominaciones en total
Chris Pratt
- Garfield
- (voz)
Samuel L. Jackson
- Vic
- (voz)
Ving Rhames
- Otto
- (voz)
Nicholas Hoult
- Jon
- (voz)
Harvey Guillén
- Odie
- (voz)
Bowen Yang
- Nolan
- (voz)
Snoop Dogg
- Maurice
- (voz)
Janelle James
- Olivia
- (voz)
Angus Cloud
- Snickers
- (voz)
Eugenia Caruso
- Maria
- (voz)
Opiniones destacadas
I have been waiting from this film since it was announced during the pandemic back in 2021 but it suddenly got delayed multiple times and at some point many stuff was leaked before release teasing that something was going wrong during production, after the film finally released I realize I was right. The film feels like a less special Garfield version of The Peanuts Movie which instead commits the same mistakes as Toy Story 4 by getting less focus of the iconic characters like Jon Arbuckle and Nermal over new ones like Garfield's father Vic in a mostly boring robbery storyline that you can feel was chopped during production as many scenes feel disconnected and with weird pacing and tonal issues.
I didn't think this would be important to me, but it is. Garfield is more known to have a raspy, "lazy" type of voice. I'm not hating on the actor, but I feel the Garfield in this movie doesn't have that kind of effect.
However, Chris Patt did wonderful with his voice acting. So did everyone else!
The thing is that Jon didn't have a major role, there was more pizza than lasagna, and no Liz.
I would like to say, the movie by itself is good. If you are okay with everything listed, I'd say to watch it. It can be a little fast paced by the start, but it'll slow down later on. In conclusion, the movies good.
However, Chris Patt did wonderful with his voice acting. So did everyone else!
The thing is that Jon didn't have a major role, there was more pizza than lasagna, and no Liz.
I would like to say, the movie by itself is good. If you are okay with everything listed, I'd say to watch it. It can be a little fast paced by the start, but it'll slow down later on. In conclusion, the movies good.
As someone who was genuinely excited about Garfield 2024, I found it to be incredibly disappointing. My expectations were high, but the film failed to meet them on nearly every level. This film had the potential to bring the beloved, lasagna-loving cat back to the forefront of popular culture, but instead, it felt like a missed opportunity.
Firstly, the storyline was lackluster and uninspired. Garfield, a character known for his witty remarks and clever humor, was relegated to a series of uninspired jokes and predictable plot points. The narrative lacked the cleverness and charm that made Garfield a household name in the first place. Instead of the sharp, sarcastic humor fans have come to expect, the film relied heavily on slapstick comedy and tired clichés, which felt out of place for a character like Garfield.
The animation style also left much to be desired. While advances in animation technology have allowed for more realistic and detailed visuals, Garfield 2024's animation felt oddly lifeless. The characters, especially Garfield, lacked the expressive quality that made the original comic strips and earlier adaptations so endearing. The film's attempt to modernize Garfield's look resulted in a character that felt distant and unrelatable. The charm and warmth of the hand-drawn Garfield were lost in the transition to a more polished, yet sterile, digital form.
Moreover, the voice acting was another area where the film fell short. The choice of voice actor for Garfield was crucial, as the character's dry, sarcastic delivery is one of his most defining traits. Unfortunately, the performance felt flat and uninspired, lacking the nuance and timing needed to bring Garfield's personality to life. This was a significant letdown, as the voice is a critical component of the character's identity.
The supporting characters, including Jon and Odie, were also poorly handled. Jon, who should be the lovable, bumbling foil to Garfield's antics, was portrayed as overly dramatic and whiny, making it hard to sympathize with him. Odie, usually the simple yet lovable dog, was reduced to a mere background character with little impact on the story.
One of the most significant disappointments was the film's failure to capture the essence of what makes Garfield so enduring. The original comic strips and earlier adaptations balanced humor with a sense of heart and relatability. Garfield's laziness, love of food, and disdain for Mondays are characteristics that many people can identify with, making him a beloved character. However, Garfield 2024 seemed to forget these core elements, opting instead for a generic, cookie-cutter approach that stripped away the uniqueness of the character.
Additionally, the film's pacing was off, making it difficult to stay engaged. Scenes dragged on without contributing to the overall narrative, and the jokes often fell flat. The lack of a compelling storyline or character development made it hard to invest in the film, and by the end, it felt more like a chore to watch rather than an enjoyable experience.
Garfield 2024 was a major disappointment. As someone genuinely excited about the film, I was left feeling let down and frustrated. The lackluster storyline, uninspired animation, poor voice acting, and mishandling of beloved characters all contributed to a film that failed to live up to its potential. Garfield deserved better, and so did the fans who were eagerly awaiting his return. This film missed the mark in almost every aspect, turning what should have been a delightful revival into a forgettable and frustrating experience.
Firstly, the storyline was lackluster and uninspired. Garfield, a character known for his witty remarks and clever humor, was relegated to a series of uninspired jokes and predictable plot points. The narrative lacked the cleverness and charm that made Garfield a household name in the first place. Instead of the sharp, sarcastic humor fans have come to expect, the film relied heavily on slapstick comedy and tired clichés, which felt out of place for a character like Garfield.
The animation style also left much to be desired. While advances in animation technology have allowed for more realistic and detailed visuals, Garfield 2024's animation felt oddly lifeless. The characters, especially Garfield, lacked the expressive quality that made the original comic strips and earlier adaptations so endearing. The film's attempt to modernize Garfield's look resulted in a character that felt distant and unrelatable. The charm and warmth of the hand-drawn Garfield were lost in the transition to a more polished, yet sterile, digital form.
Moreover, the voice acting was another area where the film fell short. The choice of voice actor for Garfield was crucial, as the character's dry, sarcastic delivery is one of his most defining traits. Unfortunately, the performance felt flat and uninspired, lacking the nuance and timing needed to bring Garfield's personality to life. This was a significant letdown, as the voice is a critical component of the character's identity.
The supporting characters, including Jon and Odie, were also poorly handled. Jon, who should be the lovable, bumbling foil to Garfield's antics, was portrayed as overly dramatic and whiny, making it hard to sympathize with him. Odie, usually the simple yet lovable dog, was reduced to a mere background character with little impact on the story.
One of the most significant disappointments was the film's failure to capture the essence of what makes Garfield so enduring. The original comic strips and earlier adaptations balanced humor with a sense of heart and relatability. Garfield's laziness, love of food, and disdain for Mondays are characteristics that many people can identify with, making him a beloved character. However, Garfield 2024 seemed to forget these core elements, opting instead for a generic, cookie-cutter approach that stripped away the uniqueness of the character.
Additionally, the film's pacing was off, making it difficult to stay engaged. Scenes dragged on without contributing to the overall narrative, and the jokes often fell flat. The lack of a compelling storyline or character development made it hard to invest in the film, and by the end, it felt more like a chore to watch rather than an enjoyable experience.
Garfield 2024 was a major disappointment. As someone genuinely excited about the film, I was left feeling let down and frustrated. The lackluster storyline, uninspired animation, poor voice acting, and mishandling of beloved characters all contributed to a film that failed to live up to its potential. Garfield deserved better, and so did the fans who were eagerly awaiting his return. This film missed the mark in almost every aspect, turning what should have been a delightful revival into a forgettable and frustrating experience.
I came to the movie to see the Garfield that I used to love from the comics from when I was a kid, and I definitely got that. The drawing style of all the characters was very recognizable and the slapstick humor that I wanted to see was present throughout the whole movie.
I must say the voice of Chris Pratt was better than expected and I think it did the character justice. Not a single moment did it not come across as unbelievable. The other voice actors were perfect and wonderfully exaggerated at moments, which fits the movie perfectly.
Jon didn't have a very big role in the movie, unfortunately, but when he was there he was like Jon was supposed to be. A bit goofy and funny.
Odie, however, was not very much like the character in the comics in my opinion. He used to be an abused sidekick that was basically always in the way and very stupid, but here he was the Robin that did everything for Garfield and he got credit for it as well. Modern times I suppose.
The plot is far fetched, the story is weird and has holes, but all that doesn't matter because it technically is a children's movie. I enjoyed the jokes and the animation quite a lot and so did my kids.
Don't compare it to the 2004 movie.
I must say the voice of Chris Pratt was better than expected and I think it did the character justice. Not a single moment did it not come across as unbelievable. The other voice actors were perfect and wonderfully exaggerated at moments, which fits the movie perfectly.
Jon didn't have a very big role in the movie, unfortunately, but when he was there he was like Jon was supposed to be. A bit goofy and funny.
Odie, however, was not very much like the character in the comics in my opinion. He used to be an abused sidekick that was basically always in the way and very stupid, but here he was the Robin that did everything for Garfield and he got credit for it as well. Modern times I suppose.
The plot is far fetched, the story is weird and has holes, but all that doesn't matter because it technically is a children's movie. I enjoyed the jokes and the animation quite a lot and so did my kids.
Don't compare it to the 2004 movie.
Kids will love this movie as its got all the staples of things they like; tug at the heart string scenes, hilarious and over the top characters plus plenty of humour. However, i do think that die hard Garfield fans like myself, who are fans of the original comic strips will be somewhat disappointed. The whole point of Garfield is that hes a very simple yet loveable character, in this movie they try to make him into a more complex cat with daddy issues. Its not bad, I just don't think Garfield fans will like it, but the kids will certainly be all over it. I took this movie with a pinch of salt and it was watchable enough. Unsure if I liked the voice actors used for some of the characters but of course nothing beats the legendary voice of the fabulous Lorenzo Music, he sure is missed!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaGarfield shown as a kitten crosses the street there is a place he passes by called Lorenzo's Music Store which is a nod to Garfield's original voice actor Lorenzo Music.
- ErroresWhen Garfield first meets Jinx, Jinx is holding a martini glass of milk. The milk levels vary wildly with each camera angle change, and eventually the glass just disappears with no explanation.
- Créditos curiososAt the end of the credits, there is a three-strip comic with Garfield asking the audience why they are still here, then he tells them they are waiting for a sequel.
- ConexionesFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: To Infinity and... (2021)
- Bandas sonorasThat's Amore
Written by Harry Warren and Jack Brooks
Performed by Dean Martin
Courtesy of Capitol Records under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Garfield Movie?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Garfield: Fuera de casa
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 60,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 91,956,547
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 24,006,629
- 26 may 2024
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 257,211,519
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 41 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Hindi language plot outline for Garfield: Fuera de Casa (2024)?
Responda