Lumina sigue a cuatro amigos que buscan desesperadamente a su amigo secuestrado en un DUMB. Encontrar o no a su amigo en los desiertos de EE.UU. hasta las arenas del Sahara, cambiará sus vid... Leer todoLumina sigue a cuatro amigos que buscan desesperadamente a su amigo secuestrado en un DUMB. Encontrar o no a su amigo en los desiertos de EE.UU. hasta las arenas del Sahara, cambiará sus vidas para siempre.Lumina sigue a cuatro amigos que buscan desesperadamente a su amigo secuestrado en un DUMB. Encontrar o no a su amigo en los desiertos de EE.UU. hasta las arenas del Sahara, cambiará sus vidas para siempre.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Sidney Nicole Brooks
- Patricia
- (as Sidney Nicole Rogers)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Gino McKoy's Lumina is a visually stunning and intellectually engaging sci-fi film. It challenges viewers with its complex narrative and philosophical themes, making it a standout in the genre. The cinematography is gorgeous, and the performances are compelling. While not a film for those seeking fast-paced action, Lumina is perfect for viewers who appreciate a blend of style and substance in their science fiction. Lumina is a remarkable achievement in science fiction cinema. Gino McKoy has crafted a film that is both visually stunning and intellectually challenging, offering a unique and thought-provoking experience. While it may not be for everyone, particularly those who prefer their sci-fi with more action and less introspection.
I was flipping through Tubi just now, and this film popped up. I saw the still of some sort of alien in the info background and thought it looked a little suspect. I did however watch the trailer. It looked like the stupidest movie ever made. As I am want to do, I headed over to IMDB to check out the reviews, although I was pretty certain I didn't need to - I knew the score. And not to my surprise, one of the lowest rated movies I've ever come across. Again, no surprise there and to say I dodged a bullet would be disingenuous because it was absurdly obvious how bad this movie was from the trailer so I was never going to watch it.
However, I did start reading the reviews. Just out of curiosity. Almost all recount a putrid experience watching this garbage. So my question is, why? Why did you make the choice to watch this movie that you hated so much? Did the trailer not give it away this was going to be a waste of time? Did the sub-three star rating on here not trigger any red flags? Did you read ANY reviews before you proceeded to click on "Watch"?
I guess I never understand how a movie can be so universally panned on so many levels, yet people still watch it and proceed to clutch their pearls and howl in dismay that they were robbed of an hour-and-a-half of their lives that "they'll never get back".
However, I did start reading the reviews. Just out of curiosity. Almost all recount a putrid experience watching this garbage. So my question is, why? Why did you make the choice to watch this movie that you hated so much? Did the trailer not give it away this was going to be a waste of time? Did the sub-three star rating on here not trigger any red flags? Did you read ANY reviews before you proceeded to click on "Watch"?
I guess I never understand how a movie can be so universally panned on so many levels, yet people still watch it and proceed to clutch their pearls and howl in dismay that they were robbed of an hour-and-a-half of their lives that "they'll never get back".
I suppose I should start with the positives, there aren't many so this shouldn't take long. The cinematography is rather good in some parts. And that....is that.
Everything else is terrible. The script. The plot. The acting. The screenplay. The direction. The editing. The CGI. The music. All of it objectively bad. Not poor, but really bad.
The worst thing about it is the unstructured, uninteresting meandering nature of the film. It is just a collection of scenes that mean nothing.
The characters and their relationship to each other is non existent.
You always know a bad movie when Eric Roberts turns up to collect his pension. Although he was in The Dark Knight, so I will cut him some slack.
Everything else is terrible. The script. The plot. The acting. The screenplay. The direction. The editing. The CGI. The music. All of it objectively bad. Not poor, but really bad.
The worst thing about it is the unstructured, uninteresting meandering nature of the film. It is just a collection of scenes that mean nothing.
The characters and their relationship to each other is non existent.
You always know a bad movie when Eric Roberts turns up to collect his pension. Although he was in The Dark Knight, so I will cut him some slack.
In the vast cosmos of science fiction cinema, where imaginative storytelling and visual spectacle often collide, "Lumina" attempts to carve out its own niche. However, it tragically falls short, earning its place in the annals of film history as one of the worst sci-fi movies ever made.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
I went to watch this movie 'lumina' in a theatre in Wahington DC. The movie was very good as it's cast was very good, the main chracter tatiana (Eleanor Williams) is very good actor has she was very good in this role, I was amazed to watch this movie I have watched a sci fi movie after a long time which has both good chracters, good story, and good animations. This movie was totally good as I felt that it is not a movie it's all happening in real world, Out of all odds the director, writer, producer Gino McKoy is very good man as it is very difficult in current time to make a sci fi movie during this time.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film underwent a serious period of development hell and the deal for producing the film nearly went up in literal flames. During pre-production, one of the producer's planes crashed due to bad weather into the Colorado mountains and caught on fire upon crashing. Despite receiving severe burns and injuries, the producer miraculously survived and was rescued by firefighters. Among one of the few things to barely survive the crash fire was the producer's paper contract. Following the producer's survival and recovery, production on the film went forward.
- Créditos curiososThere is a scene in the end credits.
- ConexionesReferences El mago de Oz (1939)
- Bandas sonorasE2ME3
composed by Gino McKoy
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Lumina?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Kummaline juhtum
- Locaciones de filmación
- Marrakech, Morocco(Hotel)
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 53 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Lumina (2024)?
Responda