Gutland

Even though there are some really cool things that go on, the film does not fully come together to be as great. I think it's becuase it came off as confusing unconnected parts but in hindsight it makes a lot of sense.

I love how the time I shown through out the film.

I love the parts where he is slightly buzzed.

The scene in the wheat field is so tense.

The charcter development was kind of wierd but makes sense in the end.

There are some really great scene in the film that make me excited to see what projects he does next.

A German drifter arrives in a village in Luxembourg looking for work on a farm. He finds work. He works hard. He meets a girl. They have sex. Several times. He meets a dog too. Thankfully, he doesn't have sex with the dog. For half of the run time of this movie - that's the story. That's it. For a movie that bills itself as a "thriller" - there are no thrills in that first half of the movie. Literally none. I'll concede that there's some mystery. Who is this drifter? Why is he there? Really? There's more to this than him looking for work. That mystery gets cleared up at about the halfway point when we learn who Jens is and why he's in the village. And the village itself it a strange one with strange people who apparently shoot amateur porn on the side when they're not harvesting corn.

At that halfway point the movie does begin to take a bit of a darker turn, and as it progresses you begin to wonder what the mix is between fantasy and reality - and I confess I was left wondering whether the whole thing was a fantasy played out in Jens' head. The last scenes of the movie seemed ambiguous; confusing. I was left with a sense that there was no real closure involved with this and questioning what was "real."

It's rated highly. I have to give it that. Sometimes, though, I really do believe that people have a tendency to rate foreign language films highly because they're foreign language films - almost as if it's a sign of being cultured. And, of course, you start to see reviewers talking about the "great cinematography" - because what else are you going to talk about to justify rating it so highly? And there was some great cinematography here - some beautiful shots of rural Luxembourg. But it really didn't make up for a confusing and rather bland story. (2/10)

I get it! If you like things to be more coherent, this may not really be your thing. And I don't even mean that you may like things spoon fed to you (although I am not judging either), but that this is as surreal as they come. I am even going to pretend to say I understood or can break the movie down entirely. There is so much that can be interpreted and are ripe for another viewing ... and even then, it would be up to the viewer.

The movie is quite sexual and quite violent. Sometimes both at the same time ... and weird too. Well the situations it creates around abuse and/or intercourse/sexuality ... they fit right into the whole surreal enviroment. They add to the mood and they also tell a story - a genre piece from Germany that works. Something I like to say rather than dislike an effort made here, because there aren't many of these types of movies made - comedies and dramas pay off better, especially when it comes to making money for the producers.

So if you can relish in a very good but also very strange (for all the right reasons) movie from Germany

As someone who lives in Luxembourg for several years I went to see this movie this evening. Just came back. Be warned this is not the mainstream kind of movie with car chases and pouring with gun shots (although there are some in it ;) ). But if you like beautiful scenery, great cinematography, flawless acting (and some sexual scenes) and a great story - this is it! It is in the style of The Wicker Man or Bergman movies. The story is catching from the very beginning. While it develops slowly, step by step, it is almost like a teasing - I never felt bored. The end is with a twist and the story is actually a metaphore trying to capture the soul of this country. It lives you with an emotional aftertaste which only great movies can deliver. I look forward to buy it on DVD to watch it again later.

Other reviewers have already done a good job explaining what this movie is about. However, anyone who gives a movie a perfect score loses some credibility. It was good, but has it's flaws like any movie.

Who should watch this movie?

If you like a slow burn that's full of atmosphere, beauty, and steeping with anxiety throughout, you probably will not be disappointed. Think Hereditary meets Badlands (the Martin Sheen Badlands) and Of Mice and Men (If that's even possible to imagine.)

I was a bit irritated by the inaccurate subtitles because I hate with translators take their own liberties with their source material. But I'm not going to fault the film for that and it didn't detract from the story at all.

Who shouldn't watch this movie?

If you don't sprechen Deutsch or hate reading subtitles you should probably move on.

If you don't enjoy a slow expositive narrative expounded through long static camera shots, pantomime expression, and an overall feeling of apathy until the whole story is wrapped up and you can appreciate the forest for the trees, shrubs, brush, and snag.

Then you'll probably be bored out of your gourd.

I'll be looking forward to the next Govinda Van Maele flick!