Seguimos a tres parejas que están a punto de casarse. La única pega es que nunca antes han conocido a su cónyuge.Seguimos a tres parejas que están a punto de casarse. La única pega es que nunca antes han conocido a su cónyuge.Seguimos a tres parejas que están a punto de casarse. La única pega es que nunca antes han conocido a su cónyuge.
- Nominada a2premios BAFTA
- 2 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
First I will say about the show. Me and wife have watched since it has started but this year seemed different then other years like they have taken a laid-back attitude which has had a negative impact on the people involved in the process I mean bringing back ella and jj. Talk about moral values someone who texts another wife's man behind there back with the intentions she had is cheating I don't care what anyone says and then letting them back on the show I mean how disrespectful to the other two that were basically shunted I feel for them. Now on to Peggy and George I feel for that man so much he technically has been broken down and emotionally tortured for having a hobby and interests that don't match Peggy and her family's ambitions.i mean Peggy listened to her mum and George is basically gone and peggys mum is always right I mean thirty something and still leaving at home yea right good advice that women got . George if you read this you had a lucky escape there mate go and find someone who loves you for you peace brother and rozz your evil how dare you treat Thomas like that what a sound bloke and you treat him like a yoyo your just toy with up and down emotionally.
This would be quite an interesting premise - if people really were marrying for good and all, and you saw them in their real lives. But since the marriages are even flimsier than a registry office 'Ming the Merciless' deal ('until such time as your majesty grows tired of her'), with the participants given the chance to opt out every week, it sadly only brings the institution into further disrepute.
But the biggest problem is that nothing happens. In Love Island the friction of living as a group - duly and judiciously aggravated by the show's producers - generally creates enough incident to keep things moving. In this show they don't actually do *anything*, so the only possibility is to keep nitpicking endlessly over every tiny little issue that disturbs their precious, entitled minds. It soon feels like living in a time loop. Having that bizarre panel of pseudo-experts watching on, nitpicking over the nitpicking, doesn't help - in fact without a voiceover like Iain Stirling's or Rob Beckett's to deflate some of the pomposity, it is hard to stomach.
As has become standard in this type of show, there's a massive double standard. Women can backbite, tell tales, stir it, poke their nose in, confront - that's all fine, in fact great (girl power!) and to criticise it is misogyny. But if the men do the same sort of thing there is an immediate furrowing of brows, followed by a hiss of disapproval, and if they persist - well, again, it's misogyny. Look forward to it becoming a hate crime folks! It's sad and actually a little disturbing to see the men, who mostly seem decent enough young lads, feeling they must invariably roll over and beg for the women who are mostly narcissistic, flaky and immature, and a million miles away from being ready to make a go of marriage.
But the biggest problem is that nothing happens. In Love Island the friction of living as a group - duly and judiciously aggravated by the show's producers - generally creates enough incident to keep things moving. In this show they don't actually do *anything*, so the only possibility is to keep nitpicking endlessly over every tiny little issue that disturbs their precious, entitled minds. It soon feels like living in a time loop. Having that bizarre panel of pseudo-experts watching on, nitpicking over the nitpicking, doesn't help - in fact without a voiceover like Iain Stirling's or Rob Beckett's to deflate some of the pomposity, it is hard to stomach.
As has become standard in this type of show, there's a massive double standard. Women can backbite, tell tales, stir it, poke their nose in, confront - that's all fine, in fact great (girl power!) and to criticise it is misogyny. But if the men do the same sort of thing there is an immediate furrowing of brows, followed by a hiss of disapproval, and if they persist - well, again, it's misogyny. Look forward to it becoming a hate crime folks! It's sad and actually a little disturbing to see the men, who mostly seem decent enough young lads, feeling they must invariably roll over and beg for the women who are mostly narcissistic, flaky and immature, and a million miles away from being ready to make a go of marriage.
I normally enjoy real life program.. this is super fake and not entertaining at all.. I hope it will remove soon and will leave the place to some good program as this been going on for to long now.. thanks god we got netflix..as this programme will just make you angry and want to switch off the tv.
I know some people find hard to find a lover.. but how I can see from your program .. they have to change.. most of them will go back home single.. in the same way they arrived.. so my question is.. is it worth it to give a chance to people that don't won't to change? Relationship is a commitment.. and the 90% of people you chose.. they might look good on camera( and this is the reason why you chose them) but they are not ready to commit..so stop waisting your own money and start to make a program with people ready to commit.
I know some people find hard to find a lover.. but how I can see from your program .. they have to change.. most of them will go back home single.. in the same way they arrived.. so my question is.. is it worth it to give a chance to people that don't won't to change? Relationship is a commitment.. and the 90% of people you chose.. they might look good on camera( and this is the reason why you chose them) but they are not ready to commit..so stop waisting your own money and start to make a program with people ready to commit.
I do find this programme entertaining in some ways however I also feel guilty that the producers quite obviously look for ways to maximise the level of human drama without any concern for the well-being of those participating in what is laughingly referred to as "the experiment". Obviously I'm fairly sure that many/most of the participants are looking for public exposure rather than/as well as, looking for a life partner but I'm often not comfortable with the producers who turn to scripted questions (ie the honesty box, etc) that are designed to cause maximum argument and in many cases result in personal hurt and pain. The so-called Psychologists really should look at their participation in this show, if they truly are the professionals that the show would have us believe they are. I sincerely hope that at a future point we don't read about a former participants illness or worse due to mental health issues. Surely there are limits to how we get our TV enjoyment and writing this review has actually made me reflect and realise that that it's not for me and I won't be watching any further.
Reality TV shows can be fun to watch, but are the contestants taking part to gain TV exposure or to find a husband/wife? I'm not sure.
The participants do seem to be selected to benefit the show i.e. In the current series there are white couples, a black couple, a mixed race couple, a lesbian couple and even a disabled chap. So clearly selection is being made based on certain criteria, not just the best match. Although there are no age gap couples (>10 year difference).
In the current series the "experts" criticise two of the men (in front of everyone else) for not being attracted to the two overweight women they have been "matched" with.
A study of which physical aspects men and women most favour in a partner, found that for women height is most important and men it is body shape.
Western countries have a problem with obesity, yet this programme is trying to normalise it. Shows like this should be promoting healthy life styles not ridiculing men for a lack of attraction.
The participants do seem to be selected to benefit the show i.e. In the current series there are white couples, a black couple, a mixed race couple, a lesbian couple and even a disabled chap. So clearly selection is being made based on certain criteria, not just the best match. Although there are no age gap couples (>10 year difference).
In the current series the "experts" criticise two of the men (in front of everyone else) for not being attracted to the two overweight women they have been "matched" with.
A study of which physical aspects men and women most favour in a partner, found that for women height is most important and men it is body shape.
Western countries have a problem with obesity, yet this programme is trying to normalise it. Shows like this should be promoting healthy life styles not ridiculing men for a lack of attraction.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe British version of the programme will return for a sixth series in 2021. However, there are major changes planned for series six. The show will switch from Channel 4 to Channel 4 Television's youth-orientated channel E4, series six will consist of 20-episodes rather than the much shorter broadcast runs of previous series and the format will change to copy the Australian version of the programme.
- ConexionesVersion of Gift ved første blik (2013)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Married at First Sight UK have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Married at First Sight UK (2015) officially released in India in English?
Responda