She Was So Pretty

Applaud the effort, but unfortunately the drastic audio problems with the dialogue make this unwatchable. The jittery cam didn't help the situation. Otherwise, this would be a watchable PG (or maybe even G) rated zero budget entry. Nothing clever or spooky.. and nothing really jumped out at me at all, save for some occasional good synth rifts and having a VHS collection of Casper the Friendly Ghost as a prop. It kind of drags for the second half, with nothing noteworthy or daring going on, with what must be the most boring kidnapper in cinematic horror history. Overall, the technical issues overshadow anything good here.

Female Director. Out-of-the-box soundtrack. Filthy tones. Creepy lead.

I admit, I streamed this movie. When it was over, I ordered a physical copy. It is not every day you find a serial killer movie that makes you want to see a sequel immediately following the credits.

The lighting is innovative. The cinematography has a life of its own. There are some super negative reviews on here, but other than the sound issues when the characters are outdoors, it just feels creepy and, sometimes, fun.

I would recommend this to horror fans who like the pre-Paranormal Activity years.

Poorly made: bad camera-work, bad sound, bad pacing, and acting that certainly could be better. The villain does come across as pretty creepy, especially since he keeps his mouth shut, but the movie drags on too much in home movie fashion for there to be any tension. Viewers also aren't rewarded with the violence and gore that they expect for investing their time watching low quality horror. Though the characters of the victims aren't developed in the slightest, the movie does sort of make the supporting role of the cop interesting. His confrontation with villain provides a resolution to the movie that is not very climactic, or intelligent, but that could be described as droll. Not a terrible movie, but it doesn't make up for its shortcomings enough to be worth it for the viewer.

Starting out it is very evident the length of this film is to be considered a home movie. That is the mediocre vibe I got from the whole thing. The audio is an easy 1/10. Its very clear no mic is present other than what is on the end of the camera in use. Don't even try to make out what most of these actors say on screen.

I didn't find the films villain to be much creepy at all. More like a weird guy making gestures his actor isn't very comfortable doing. Which is laughably all it is - gestures. He hardly has any lines. You'll find many dull closeups of him and his few wardrobe changes throughout the film.

This film wouldn't be so boring if it did not try to create a 70's horror vibe so much. The quality ruins it all. As everyone is saying, its true, the soundtrack is the only worthwhile thing here that saves this and gives it a one star worthiness.

In the opening moments of the movie we are treated to 33 seconds of a close up on the main villain's tongue, clumsy, awkward and unnecessary, it sets the tone for the entire movie. What follows is a strange sequence of terribly acted and poorly written dialogue in scenes that do little to build tension. The actors, if you can even call them that, don't seem to understand how to deliver any part of their awkward dialogue. The music while i feel is good is set much louder than the rest of the movie further highlighting the poor sound quality of of every other aspect of the movie. The camera work varies in quality wildly from the poorly framed an shaky shots outside to the excellently framed indoor shots in the later half of the movie. Overall ... terrible movie.