The movie is a shameful exponent of cancel culture, gravely distorting facts, context, characters, dialogues etc just to fit the socialist narrative, far away from all written content created by Karl May. They just used his brand mark to promote a vicious agenda.
Ages of characters. Almost all characters are miss aged, creating premises for "moral" judgments, made by the certain spectators which are "empowered" in doing that, like some relations between characters are or not "morally acceptable".
Facts. The author insists firmly on the religious construct of the main character, which he correlated with the entire flow of his creation, also creating causalities on it. But in the movie, the main character is presenting himself as an atheist, making the entire narrative flow an invention.
Context. In the movie it is completely ignored the construct of the home of the apache, putting all in tents. Also, almost everything, as in the stage, is dirty, scrambled, primitive, savage. This act forcibly degrades the origin of the apache, their culture, their civilization, therefore their vision upon life itself.
