CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.6/10
1.4 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
El ex presidente Richard Graves tiene la epifanía, de que veinte años después de dejar el cargo, sus políticas habrán dañado al país durante décadas.El ex presidente Richard Graves tiene la epifanía, de que veinte años después de dejar el cargo, sus políticas habrán dañado al país durante décadas.El ex presidente Richard Graves tiene la epifanía, de que veinte años después de dejar el cargo, sus políticas habrán dañado al país durante décadas.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
I'm really enjoying this show, I think Nick Nolte is fantastic and the rest of the cast getting better and better as the roles expand and the story-line becomes more convoluted.
Sadly, I think Ernie Hudson is under-utilized, as usual, hopefully this can change and we get to see more about "Uncle Jacoob's" service to the Graves family over the years.
My favorite so far is ep 5, "Lions in Winter". Great quotes from Shakespeare's "King Lear"!
Roll on season 2!
Sadly, I think Ernie Hudson is under-utilized, as usual, hopefully this can change and we get to see more about "Uncle Jacoob's" service to the Graves family over the years.
My favorite so far is ep 5, "Lions in Winter". Great quotes from Shakespeare's "King Lear"!
Roll on season 2!
I only watched the first episode of this series, but I feel there's no reason to believe the show would get any better.
The basic premise is an ex-U.S. president regrets his actions in office and decides to rectify all the awful choices that make him a historically terrible president. (Graves seems to be mainly based on GW Bush, who certainly ranks as one of the worst presidents.)
First off, this is a very silly fantasy premise. Politicians are huge egotists, and they really feel qualified to make all these decisions. Certainly some presidents have looked back at some of their decisions with regret, but I suspect most of them would insist that at the time of those decisions it was a sensible option. I certainly don't think any president would do a 180 because pundits and historians were attacking him; after all, there would also be pundits and historians praising him - even Bush gets that.
But the first episode suggests the real problem with the series will be cowardice. Because the first thing Grave says he'll try and rectify is cutting funding for cancer research.
Is there any issue that is safer than saying, I'll do more for cancer research? As terrible as cancer is, it's very well funded and thus not struggling as much as a lot of other programs.
If this were a political satire, which it pretends to be, it would start off with something genuinely controversial. Voter-suppressive ID laws, immigration policies, abortion.
Perhaps the series is just warming up, but here's the thing; satire doesn't dip its toe in the water to check the temperature. It doesn't ease you in. Satire is cutting and savage and strikes out in all directions. Satire, in other words, is Veep. Graves is, well, not much of anything.
I wouldn't be as annoyed with the series cowardice if it just had the decency to be funny. But I didn't laugh once.
That being said, the acting is good, even if the characters are stock.
The basic premise is an ex-U.S. president regrets his actions in office and decides to rectify all the awful choices that make him a historically terrible president. (Graves seems to be mainly based on GW Bush, who certainly ranks as one of the worst presidents.)
First off, this is a very silly fantasy premise. Politicians are huge egotists, and they really feel qualified to make all these decisions. Certainly some presidents have looked back at some of their decisions with regret, but I suspect most of them would insist that at the time of those decisions it was a sensible option. I certainly don't think any president would do a 180 because pundits and historians were attacking him; after all, there would also be pundits and historians praising him - even Bush gets that.
But the first episode suggests the real problem with the series will be cowardice. Because the first thing Grave says he'll try and rectify is cutting funding for cancer research.
Is there any issue that is safer than saying, I'll do more for cancer research? As terrible as cancer is, it's very well funded and thus not struggling as much as a lot of other programs.
If this were a political satire, which it pretends to be, it would start off with something genuinely controversial. Voter-suppressive ID laws, immigration policies, abortion.
Perhaps the series is just warming up, but here's the thing; satire doesn't dip its toe in the water to check the temperature. It doesn't ease you in. Satire is cutting and savage and strikes out in all directions. Satire, in other words, is Veep. Graves is, well, not much of anything.
I wouldn't be as annoyed with the series cowardice if it just had the decency to be funny. But I didn't laugh once.
That being said, the acting is good, even if the characters are stock.
Although the show starts out as somewhat predictable with the family dynamics, it is when you get into the series that you see the true heart in the show. The laughs come from the crazy situations that family gets themselves into.
Republicans are bad. Democrats are good.
[ yawn ]
Is there anything more tired than that old narrative? And aren't shows like this a dime a dozen? Alpha House was actually funnier and it's canceled.
I'll watch some more and perhaps change my review after doing so, but I'm not holding my breath that this sad little show will perform any better than the 1st episode did.
When will Hollywood learn that predictable is boring as hell?
The only reason I didn't give it 1 star is because Sela Ward's acting is actually pretty good considering the disaster that is this show's writing.
[ yawn ]
Is there anything more tired than that old narrative? And aren't shows like this a dime a dozen? Alpha House was actually funnier and it's canceled.
I'll watch some more and perhaps change my review after doing so, but I'm not holding my breath that this sad little show will perform any better than the 1st episode did.
When will Hollywood learn that predictable is boring as hell?
The only reason I didn't give it 1 star is because Sela Ward's acting is actually pretty good considering the disaster that is this show's writing.
Anything with Sela Ward gets a 10, and then you work backwards.
Nick Nolte has become a caricature of himself and the days of "Affliction" are long, long gone.
Think of Bill Maher writing a series of acts of contrition for George W. Bush, spend no time editing them or inserting irony and wit, and you have "Graves".
The stereotypical characters, including the cameos of "real life" politicians, make you embarrassed to watch, and if you are looking for some nexus or meaningful connection to the current election campaign, do not hold your breathe.
Hard to figure out why it was not so much better. A group of professionals phoned it in.
Nick Nolte has become a caricature of himself and the days of "Affliction" are long, long gone.
Think of Bill Maher writing a series of acts of contrition for George W. Bush, spend no time editing them or inserting irony and wit, and you have "Graves".
The stereotypical characters, including the cameos of "real life" politicians, make you embarrassed to watch, and if you are looking for some nexus or meaningful connection to the current election campaign, do not hold your breathe.
Hard to figure out why it was not so much better. A group of professionals phoned it in.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaSela Ward landed the female lead after Susan Sarandon bowed out due to artistic differences.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Graves have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución30 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 16 : 9
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta