That's Not Me

Comedy IS difficult. It's difficult to do, and it's difficult to get right. This film, sadly, fails on both accounts, and more ...

The movie is shot OK, looking quite presentable, and the acting from a lot of the characters is alright too. But where "That's Not Me" really falls into its deepest hole is in failing to meet up to the expectation of its apparent genre - it's just not funny. Not even remotely. In actuality, it has more than a few cringe worthy scenes throughout which were clearly intended to be comedic, but aren't.

In short - the movie is uninteresting, boring even, with little or no plot and/or emotion to make you care what's going to happen next. There is also nothing dynamic, either visually or in the storytelling. In shorter than short - it doesn't do what it says on the tin.

Written and starring Alice Foulcher... as twins, in show business. People recognize her from tv .... but she's the other, less successful sister Polly! fun premise. fun jokes. low-key, awkward humor. the grind of brutal auditions, combined with people mistaking Polly for her own sister Amy, over and over. a really funny moment when a creep who Polly sees now and then starts telling the same, lame story he told her on the last (bad) date. some really funny lines in here. we can feel the anguish Polly feels as her family and friends constantly talk about her twin Amy, who is getting all the breaks. a lot of humor in this film, with some life lessons. or something. good stuff. showing on roku channel. directed by Greg Erdstein, who had done mostly shorts prior to this.

This film is Gregory Erdstein's first full length feature film (10 previous credits for short films) as director, producer and co-writer alongside Alice Foulcher who was also the lead.

It's a cute film directed fairly decent, but with a sloppy story that really had no point to it, and was certainly not a comedy (I did not laugh once).

It's clearly a low budget Aussie flick that made a decent attempt to tell a story, but failed so in the screenplay. In the beginning, it was hard to tell which twin was in certain scenes. Although the story was based on the struggles of one of the twins chasing her acting career and riding the coattails of her sister, at the end of the film you are left saying "that's it? so what?". There was no point to this film.

The acting was however fairly decent, the score a little too obvious in certain scenes, and the editing could have been tighter. This film missed the mark in telling the story better. Certainly not 10/10 material the other two fake reviewers posted, of which are clearly a spoiler plot summary. Would I recommend it or see it again? Nope. It's a very generous 6/10 from me only because it's a low budget indie Aussie flick and for its "cuteness" factor.

I actually quite liked this little Aussie movie but really didn't like the lead actor. She wasn't believable and generally not very likeable.

That said, the supporting cast, script and dialogue were pretty good.

A watchable movie with some good insights into the difficulty of achieving fame.

This movie is epic for the simple reason it was done on such a small budget. Yet another example of the raw talent we have here in Australia.

If this was a big budget Hollywood movie I would have it at 5 stars. No it isn't the best movie I have ever seen but considering the budget it is close. Having just seen Once Upon a Time in Hollywood which people are raving about (and was done with 150 times bigger budget).

I would put both movies at the same rating when it comes to entertainment so from my point of view That's Not Me is 150 times better than Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.