Deadman Apocalypse

With a 1500 pound budget what do you expect? Not bad for 1500 pounds because I think realistically we know how much decent films cost to make

I managed to endure 29 minutes of this ordeal of a movie before I gave up out of sheer and utter boredom and hopelessness!

The storyline in this movie made absolutely no sense. Apparently the world has come to an end, and people were living below the ground in tunnels that they made from wooden pallets. But for some reason they opted to make the tunnels so small that everyone had to crawl in order to get around. Yeah, I know! It made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

The characters in the movie were just as pointless and one-dimensional as the storyline. And the actors and actresses hired to portray these featureless characters, well they had virtually nothing to work with.

I am not returning to finish this movie! Not even if I were to be paid for it, because this movie was unfathomably unappealing and uninteresting.

I would rather get castrated than watch this movie again. Don't waste your time watching it, the highlight of the movie is three people riding on painted Barbie jeeps. This movie gives you an itch on the roof of your mouth that only a loaded shotgun could scratch.

I have given 2/10s before but never a 1/10, but this "film" deserves nothing more.

It is not even worthy of watching for a little B-grade background badness. The movie honestly feels like the writer/director watched and wrote down a little game of make-believe performed by a couple of kids in a Mcdonald's play set and the set design, plot progression and god awful acting really makes you feel like you are watching a bunch of men-children playing pretend.

The only thing that could of saved this movie would be if it didn't take itself so seriously, it could of worked on some level if it was aware of it's own awfulness, like Kung Fury.

In conclusion; don't waste your time with this garbage and the director should go back to mopping sick off the McDonald's floor and stop watching kids in the play set.

Charlie Steeds is a British filmmaker who has produced some passable efforts in low budget filmmaking. This early effort shows some moxie to be sure but doesn't live up to expectations. Many have made much of the fact that the movie's budget was 1500 pounds. What was put up on screen for that amount was the admirable part. The rest of the movie lacks. A claustrophobic effort, the action is severely lacking--there aren't a lot of choices when your set consists of low, narrow tunnels constructed from wooden pallets. Clearly, this is supposed to be some coming of age epic backdropped by an apocalyptic event that destroys the world and forces humanity underground to survive, as we see when a special ops team enters the tunnel system to retrieve some stolen water. This may have worked if the script was better, but it isn't. This movie is too talky for the set--who wants to listen to half-baked exposition while actors struggle to crawl around in these halls of pallet? And if there was a way to make exciting action sequences in these tunnels, the filmmakers didn't have it. This one gets rather tedious until the characters manage to break free from their underground hell, but by then most viewers will have lost interest. Check out Charlie Steeds' latter efforts like WINTERSKIN to see the man's vision realized well.