Anna, Elsa, Kristoff, Olaf y Sven abandonan Arendalle y viajan a un antiguo bosque en otoño para descubrir los orígenes de los poderes de Elsa y salvar su reino.Anna, Elsa, Kristoff, Olaf y Sven abandonan Arendalle y viajan a un antiguo bosque en otoño para descubrir los orígenes de los poderes de Elsa y salvar su reino.Anna, Elsa, Kristoff, Olaf y Sven abandonan Arendalle y viajan a un antiguo bosque en otoño para descubrir los orígenes de los poderes de Elsa y salvar su reino.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Nominado a 1 premio Óscar
- 18 premios ganados y 95 nominaciones en total
Kristen Bell
- Anna
- (voz)
Idina Menzel
- Elsa
- (voz)
Alfred Molina
- Agnarr
- (voz)
Jason Ritter
- Ryder
- (voz)
Ciarán Hinds
- Pabbie
- (voz)
Alan Tudyk
- Guard
- (voz)
- …
Santino Fontana
- Hans
- (archivo de sonido)
Livvy Stubenrauch
- Young Anna
- (archivo de sonido)
Opiniones destacadas
Not a patch on the first one, no memorable songs, weak and forced storyline. Clearly the writers took what was best from the first and amped it up to the max but forgot that a good film is based on a good story not on a good message.
(This has a post-credit scene in case you're wondering)
The songs are great. Especially Kristoff's song, an 80's jam as Jonathan Groff would say it. Even the animation looks like an 80's music video which I find funny. Olaf's comedic skits are even funnier. For Into the Unknown, not as catchy as Let it Go but time will tell. The animation, the best. Elsa got even beautifuller. If you saw the water animation you would see *much* more of that. The story is bigger, questions are answered, but there are some points that look silly. The plot is predictable but personally I enjoyed it.
The only thing I'm having a hard time agreeing with is the ending.
The songs are great. Especially Kristoff's song, an 80's jam as Jonathan Groff would say it. Even the animation looks like an 80's music video which I find funny. Olaf's comedic skits are even funnier. For Into the Unknown, not as catchy as Let it Go but time will tell. The animation, the best. Elsa got even beautifuller. If you saw the water animation you would see *much* more of that. The story is bigger, questions are answered, but there are some points that look silly. The plot is predictable but personally I enjoyed it.
The only thing I'm having a hard time agreeing with is the ending.
It's a sequel and as expected it's not as good as the first but Disney have created an outstanding film. Don't listen to the cynical reviews, the plot is no worse than the plot of the original and the movie features beautiful visuals and music with the same likeable characters.
Six years is not a particularly long time to wait for a sequel, but in the case of Frozen it is hard not to feel that the decision to return was totally motivated by money-making potential and not much else. Of course it is naïve to think that any sequel is made out of love for the audience etc and without money in mind, but usually it doesn't feel so brazen as this; and that impression is not helped by Disney digging up its own back catalogue to remake and resell them. In the meantime Frozen made over a billion dollars, with hit records, merchandise, stage shows etc, so the sequel was not a great surprise - but it is a bit of a disappointment.
The plot is the aspect that hurts it. It feels like it was written by a committee, and puts too much effort into keeping all the characters busy by giving them something to do. As a result the plot feels convoluted due to the number of threads that don't have direct relationship to one another. In addition, the threads themselves have a lot going on that is hard to translate for children - the link to past generations, the origin of powers; all sorts of things like this rob it of impact because it feels less smooth - you can hear the gears grinding as it moves along. There are several strong songs, not quite the strength of the first film but that was a high bar to clear. There are funny moments, but the whole thing does feel less 'fun'.
At the same time my reduced investment in the film meant it had less emotional impact; it doesn't take much for me to get choked up but nothing did anything for me in this one. It wasn't awful of course, just disappointing. It still offers the songs, the laughs, the spectacle but it does it in such a heavy-set way that it doesn't spark or feel organic as it does it - and as a result the feeling gets stronger that this is only really about squeezing more money from the audience.
The plot is the aspect that hurts it. It feels like it was written by a committee, and puts too much effort into keeping all the characters busy by giving them something to do. As a result the plot feels convoluted due to the number of threads that don't have direct relationship to one another. In addition, the threads themselves have a lot going on that is hard to translate for children - the link to past generations, the origin of powers; all sorts of things like this rob it of impact because it feels less smooth - you can hear the gears grinding as it moves along. There are several strong songs, not quite the strength of the first film but that was a high bar to clear. There are funny moments, but the whole thing does feel less 'fun'.
At the same time my reduced investment in the film meant it had less emotional impact; it doesn't take much for me to get choked up but nothing did anything for me in this one. It wasn't awful of course, just disappointing. It still offers the songs, the laughs, the spectacle but it does it in such a heavy-set way that it doesn't spark or feel organic as it does it - and as a result the feeling gets stronger that this is only really about squeezing more money from the audience.
It's not hard to imagine how big this movie will be. I, as well as many others, am a huge fan of the first film and the short films that followed it. Frozen II has a different feel to it. While the first film was brimming with quirky moments, the follow up feels a little more mature in its plot and themes. This story heavily centers around the importance of change, even if that means letting go. Throughout the film, I found myself dazzled with the quality and beauty of the visuals that the animation team laid out. The story, for me, felt a little flat, however. I think the writing team missed the mark when trying to achieve the same quirkiness from the original. With the more dramatic path the writers chose to take, also came more epic musical numbers and effects. Sure there were still plenty of humorous moments, but I personally felt myself longing for more. I also find irony in the fact that this film centers around change and the overall feel of the film felt like a major shift from the first. I do think this film will still appeal to many others and I, myself, am still very excited to watch it a second time. Overall, I'd say this film found success in what it was trying to achieve and the message it was trying to send to its viewers, but couldn't quite live up to the whimsicality of the original. While not as good as the first, it's still a film you will want to take your family to and is a great addition to the Frozen franchise. 7/10
'Frozen II' Champions Anna & Elsa's Perfect Imperfections
'Frozen II' Champions Anna & Elsa's Perfect Imperfections
The Frozen II creative team share why they think Anna and Elsa connect with audiences as they tease some of the sequel's revelations.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe song used to call Elsa to the enchanted forest is a type of Scandinavian herding call called kulning. It was used briefly in the score of the first movie. In Frozen 2, the kulning central to the plot is performed by a Norwegian singer Aurora. The melody used for the kulning is the "dies irae," which, since the 13th-century (or sooner), has referred to the wrath of God's judgment on humanity.
- ErroresWhen Anna tells the Rock Giants to throw their boulders, the first one hits the middle of the bridge, but when Anna is running back to Kristoff and Mattias, that part of the dam is not broken.
- Créditos curiososThere is a post-credits scene in which Olaf recaps the events of the film.
- ConexionesEdited into Zenimation: Water (2020)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 150,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 477,373,578
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 130,263,358
- 24 nov 2019
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 1,453,683,476
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 43min(103 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta