Tanque 432

I'm so sick of finding movies on Netflix that are rated 4 stars or more, and in reality, are nothing higher than zero. In this case, that rating has to be false as no viewer with half a brain would rate it more than a 1, if that? My God, what an awful movie. There's not much I can add that hasn't already been written. Disastrous plot, terrible acting, atrocious dialog, etc., etc. I still have no idea what was going on, or why. And to top it off, I don't care! Avoid this at all cost.

Wish I had read the reviews before I watched this pile of garbage. Poor script, poor acting. The 432 must have belonged to Dr Who for the amount of room that was inside. The interior was longer than the exterior.

Given writer, Nick Gillespie's pedigree (e.g. Kill List, Sightseers) I was hopeful of an entertaining story.

The film starts with a "jolt"; five minutes in I found myself reaching for the DVD box to read the synopsis, in order to try and "work out" what the opening point of the film was (the box confirmed - I can't think of a time I've ever had to do this before in all my years of watching films, though).

What followed for the rest of the film somewhat reminded me of being a participant of a paint-balling contest, without the "excitement" of actually being there.

This is certainly a step backwards from previous efforts, perhaps, due to budget constraints?

Without spoiling the ending, I'd just say that whilst Kill List left you pondering things, this one just doesn't seem to mean anything at all; to me anyway.

Hopefully the next film will be better.

The acting was fair, Gordon Kennedy keeps popping up, but having seen the ending coming a mile off after 10 minutes I only watched to the end for the slim chance of being proved wrong. I was not. The film started off mysteriously, asking the viewer to draw their own plot lines with weak special effects and oddball performances. Too much too soon. Perhaps it was my own fault for watching 'Darkest Day' about a month previous and expecting something different, nothing was - except the acting which was immensely improved but pi**ed away by the tired old plot. Shot with competence but no real flair for suspense, character building or even editing the film promised far more than it had to give.

I tried

Tank 432 - ahhh, where do I begin with you? I really, really wanted to like Tank 432. I did. I went in with good expectations. From the start they were off. Title says 'Tank' - description says 'Armored Personnel Carrier'. But I suppose APC 432 doesn't sound as scary. There will probably be spoilers because I don't even know what a spoiler would be for this damn movie.

Tank 432 could have been so much better if it had a clear goal in mind. It kept throwing so much in that didn't make sense, didn't belong and just didn't fit. Like Unconscious Girl. Why was she there? What was her purpose? You got me. A big girl-shaped red herring? I am all for anyone's interpretation. What's the orange powder? The experiment? How they manage to destroy an APC with a flamethrower? Why were they locked in when Unconscious Girl could easily open the door? Who were the prisoners and why? Nothing gets answered. At all. Even just a few notes in The Notebook that Guy in Charge kept scribbling in would have sufficed. But no. Even he gets conveniently flare gunned before we can get any answers from him.

The only character that I liked was the medic. She actually was fairly smart, strong and somewhat interesting. In fact, the acting is part of the reason Tank 432 even merits 2 Coolthulhus. The acting was pretty good. The actors didn't have a whole lot to work with but they did the best they could. The feeling of claustrophobia was well done. I got antsy just watching them squirm around the tight spaces and each other. There were some fairly cool shots as well and the camera work was good. The creepy teleporting guys were kind of cool but not enough was done with them. Same with the creepy gas mask creature you get to see all of once. Even an image that could have been so cool (it involves heads and an engine compartment) was skipped over. You know what we do get to see? Some guy taking a crap, getting it on his hand and then smearing it on his face. Yay.

Apparently there is an end credit scene that 'explains' it was all a test. We can figure out that it's a test and partly why. They're obviously testing some kind of Orange Crush drug called 'Kratos' for chemical warfare, either to amp up their soldiers or to use on the 'enemy'. What's not answered is literally everything above. For the 'test' concept to work multiple groups of mercenaries/soldiers would all have to have zero memories besides the task they're set to. This would require no questions or conversation with their squad, no conversation with the 'Prisoners' (their role in this is a total mystery) and destroying a 'tank' each time. Presuming this is test number 432 (and I could be wrong about that), that's 432 tanks destroyed. It also counts on these mercs doing the exact same things as the previous trials. What if they retreated to the woods instead of the tank? When you add in all of the questions above it just doesn't work. You should not rely on an end credit scene to explain your movie for you. Because most people won't see it.

Movies that are outright bad are far less frustrating than movies that could be good. Tank 432 falls into this latter category. There were so many things they could have done to make Tank 432 a much better movie. Even a small explanation would have gone a long way to making this better. As it stands I can't recommend this. Not unless you like feeling frustrated. I'm getting very tired of movies that end with no ending. It can work if the movie is done well. If it's given you the pieces to fit it together. Then there are these movies. Movies that just throw random stuff at you then say "Well, you just don't get it" if you have questions. You're right. I don't get it because it doesn't make any sense. Crush this one with an actual tank.