Salt and Fire

The first hour of this movie is pretty bad, story/ acting, pointless flashback. but the last half hour is spectacular. worth watching for the end. maybe skip to it.

Saw this last night at TIFF. it was hard to sit for the whole movie.. Acting was just terrible, it was like these people had never acted before, or maybe this was there first time acting in English.

As for the plot...Its a simple one with the story that is stretched for too long. At times you are wondering what does the last 10 min has to do with the overall story...This is what you get when the director writes the scripts, and produces the movie...it becomes a college project... and the music, at times you wonder what was he thinking..even the volume of the music was not same across the movie..

Its a 2 star, just for some of the cinematography... save yourself your time and stay away. A lot of people left right after the credit started, which is rare at TIFF.

I had to wonder what I was watching throughout, consistently waiting for something to happen. Salt and Fire delivers a film which is more like a patchwork quilt. Bits and pieces of ideas designed to be thought provoking but, in a typical arty style, leave you to draw your own conclusions to the meaning. So it allows itself to be watchable, just about, without anything of significance taking place. The only thing I took from the whole thing was that sometimes people who like nice stuff make bad decisions and then have to face their demons.

The acting was stilted throughout. Even Michael Shannon, who I tend to consider at least reasonable, played his part in keeping with everyone else. I still wonder whether it was intentional, perhaps some device designed to make you ask why.

Interesting idea, but it probably deserves a more fitting synopsis. This isn't a thriller and certainly isn't a disaster movie or maybe it is, if the film could play out for another 200,000 years.

A Franco-American-German drama; A story about a scientist who blames the head of a large company for ecological disaster in South America, but when a volcano begins to show signs of erupting, they must unite to avoid a disaster. This film has a theme about the conflict between science and business, where humans are being changed by their environment. As early as a quarter of an hour in, it becomes apparent that the film was not made with care. Poor editing, shaky camera tracking, and a poor script with stilted dialogue that falters. Tangential conversations lead nowhere, and characters introduced are left hanging; where there is focus on character exposition, it is ham-fisted. There are recondite descriptions and bumper-sticker philosophising like, "Truth is the only daughter of time." That said, it is an ambitious project, and it has heart in its message. Michael Shannon brings watchability, and the beautiful Bolivian locales help while we ponder the director's message about pollution. As an aside, viewers who are familiar with the director's reputation as a pioneer of New German cinema will assume he got bogged down in his passion project because it is poor by his high standards.

Salt and Fire (2016)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

Three scientists are on their way to give a report to the United Nations when they are taken hostage. Laura (Veronica Ferres) is the main focus as one of the kidnappers (Michael Shannon) wants to make sure she realizes what a greedy company can do to people and their environment.

Werner Herzog is one of the most fascinating filmmakers to ever grace film buffs yet there's no question that something went horribly wrong with this picture. Herzog has a brilliant mind and probably a mind that is a lot more intelligent than the majority of the people who watch his films yet for the life of me I don't know what he was trying to do with this picture. He wrote the screenplay so I'm sure he was trying to get some sort of message across about ruining the world that we live in but it comes as a pretty epic fail.

SALT AND FIRE is a very weird film and a very bad one at times. Again, I'm sure Herzog had something in mind but sadly it just didn't come to life on the screen and the end result is a rather boring and flat film. It starts off as a hostage/thriller type of picture yet there's never any suspense and for the life of me I can't even see where the director even attempted to build any. I'm really not sure what the entire point of this opening kidnapping was if you weren't going for some sort of suspense.

Things don't get much better once the lead scientist and her taker begin to form a strange relationship. Again, what the point of this was is rather confusing because it just doesn't play out in the picture. We then get another set up with the woman out in a salt field with two blind children. I think these sequences are the most interesting in the film and I'm sure something great could have been done with this alone but it just wasn't to be. Even these scenes are full of bad moments where there's just no pay off or anything of real interest.

Both Ferres and Shannon are good in their roles but there's just so much any great actor can do with mediocre parts. The film does features a rather nice and unique music score and I'd argue that the cinematography was very good as well. The film was shot in Boliva and we've got some terrific visuals to look at but sadly just about everything else is flat. SALT AND FIRE is a real misfire from a legendary director who usually delivers much better.