El perro samurái: La leyenda de Kakamucho

In a land of cats who live in a state similar to Feudal Japan, feudal lord Ika Chu (Ricky Gervais) seeks destroy the village of Kakamucho as he considers it an eyesore. After orchestrating a raid by bandits that scares away Kakamucho's samurai, the townspeople send a request to the Shogun (Mel Brooks) requesting another Samurai. Ika Chu is ordered by the Shogun to send a replacement samurai and decides to send Hank (Michael Cera) a bumbling dog who is scheduled for trespassing in the land to be executed as Kakamucho's new samurai. Hank having always aspired to be a samurai eagerly accepts the position as an alterative to execution, but once in Kakamucho finds its residents less than hospitable towards dogs. Now with the help of a disgraced former samurai named Jimbo (Samuel L. Jackson), Hank trains in the ways of the Samurai as Ika Chu plots the town's demise.

Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank began life under the title of Blazing Samurai and was spearheaded by Sony Pictures Founder Yair Landau. Originally intended to be about a black samurai in Feudal era Japan with comedian Chris Rock named as a potential co-producer until eventually being retooled to having more of a "funny animal" spin. The movie was noted for its continuous stop/start production cycle with production initially announced in 2014 with a projected 2015 release date by Open Road Films, but due to issues with distribution problems, animation providers, and at one point attempts at "crowdsourcing" the animation by "paying" individuals in exposure (seriously) the movie ended up coming out 8 years after it was announced. Usually when an animated film goes through that level of production and release hell it's usually not a good sign (see Foodfight! For example). With Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank, the end result isn't a trainwreck or anything, but it's also very middle of the road and is a rehash of one of the most quoted and beloved comedies of all time.

While Paws of Fury sidesteps the edgier aspects of the Richard Pryor co-scripted Blazing Saddles, people who are familiar with Blazing Saddles will pick up on the similarities from the first scene as the opening credits (which are very stylish) have a song titled "Blazing Samurai" in what's an obvious leftover from when this film was titled as such. However despite Paws of Fury following the same simple plot of the original film, Paws of Fury only plays maybe 40% of its scenes for parody while the remaining 60% are played for legitimate pathos so the movie exists in this weird space where it's being quite glib about storytelling tropes like montages, flashbacks, and other such forth wall breaks made by the characters, but then it also plays parts of the story for drama which seems to miss the point of the original film. While it's not unthinkable that Blazing Saddles plot could've worked played straight (especially since it was essentially a stock western plot designed as a joke machine) even taking Blazing Saddles out of the equation there's been other films that have done this sort of thing better such as the Kung Fu Panda films or even Rango which also featured an ill equipped protector of a small town. There are some things that do work in this movie however. Samuel L. Jackson voices Jimbo who's the equivalent of Gene Wilder's Jim the Waco Kid from the original, and he does bring a lot of energy to his part and gets the lion's share of the laughs from this movie. Ricky Gervais is also pretty amusing playing the equivalent of Harvey Korman's Hedley LaMarr and does get some good moments, even if he has to utter some stupid lines like a joke about a giant toilet called "The Super Bowl". The animation is okay, yes I've seen better but I've also seen far worse and considering this was finished remotely under COVD protocols it's probably better looking than it has any right to be.

Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank survived nearly a decade of production limbo only to be met with a resounding "meh". There's nothing the movie really does wrong and I supposed if the kids have worn out their Kung Fu Panda movies this might fit the bill for entertainment, but for anyone else it's just a really mediocre film that reminds you periodically of a comedy classic with the same plot, same jokes, and mostly the same characters to the point where if you have seen Blazing Saddles there's not really much here you didn't see originally.

It's a alright family film, few adult jokes in it as well. It's not the best kids film but worth a watch with the kids. My daughter was laughing throughout. Could of been better though. So wouldn't go out of my way to watch it again.

... to the point of stupidity. Really.

No, it is not a "ripoff of kung fu panda." China and Japan are actually different places with different cultures.

This was also not someone "ripping off" Mel Brooks. He directed it! He's in it! And the role he plays is the same one he plays in Blazing Saddles.

Because it IS Blazing Saddles. The writers of the original are even credited. Given how many American Westerns were redone Samurai movies, it's a pretty established pattern.

It's definitely got some tongue-in-cheek references. It has some jokes that (as Mel Brooks movies do) push the line. But it tells a good story and has solid voice acting, so I'm not sure where some of the complaints are coming from.

Same movie as blazing saddles but samurai and for kids. Because of this it's very predictable. Still like it tho and I think kids would love it. Solid seven stars.

Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank (2022) was not great, but it was not awful. I do know that this movie is a child friendly remake of Blazing Saddles (1974) just with samurais, which Is weird.

The voice acting was good like Michael Cera and Samuel L. Jackson, and the animation was not that bad because it had some nice backgrounds with some nice visuals.

There are small funny scenes I laughed at, but most of the jokes are for kids to laugh at. There are some unexpected scenes that happen in the movie that I thought was funny at times.

The action scenes are fast moving and there are references to other movies that can be funny but unnecessary. The references will be funny mostly to parents who take their kids to see this movie.

There are mostly jokes that are not funny, the main villain is not in the movie that much, and the evil plan for the villain is stupid. I am not the target audience for this movie, but this is a quick movie for kids and adults to watch that will not hurt anyone.